How Google’s AI Uses “Query Fan-Out” to Find Traffic Camera Data

If you've ever wondered how Google finds red light camera locations, speed camera zones, or traffic violation videos so quickly—it's thanks in part to a search technology called “query fan-out.” This AI-powered technique helps Google pull data from a wide array of sources in milliseconds, improving the quality of its search results for enforcement-related queries.

🔍 What is Query Fan-Out?

Query fan-out means that your search is split and distributed across many databases or indexes simultaneously. For example, when someone searches "speed camera locations in Chicago," Google doesn't send that query to just one database—it sends it to dozens of indexes: maps, news, videos, shopping, and even legal databases.

🚦 How This Applies to Traffic Enforcement

At PhotoEnforced.com, we know firsthand how important it is to index thousands of traffic camera locations accurately. Google's AI now uses fan-out to:

• Scan image databases (e.g., Google Street View) for camera poles
• Cross-reference local news about new enforcement installations
• Pull from government PDFs or city council meeting notes
• Index crowdsourced platforms like ours and community forums

🤖 AI + Real-Time Traffic Enforcement = Faster Alerts

With query fan-out, AI systems can also integrate live data, such as traffic sensor feeds or license plate recognition logs. This is why a query like "red light camera ticket appeal San Diego" might surface a legal article, a court link, and a blog post from a traffic attorney—all within seconds.

📡 Why It Matters for Drivers

For drivers concerned about getting ticketed without warning, understanding how AI-driven search works is key. It allows platforms like ours to become more discoverable and for you to find enforcement data more easily—even before your local city updates its own website.

📌 Want Real-Time Alerts?

We're building a subscription-based service to warn you of red light cameras and speed cameras on your route—integrated with Apple Maps and Google Maps using real-time, crowdsourced data.

Stay ahead of automated enforcement with smarter data. Sign up to get alerts, and help us improve our map by submitting new locations.

How Many Cities & Countries Use Red Light and Speed Cameras?

How Many Cities Use Red Light and Speed Cameras?

Automated traffic enforcement using red light and speed cameras is a growing trend worldwide, although its implementation varies significantly by region. These systems are used to deter dangerous driving behavior, improve road safety, and reduce traffic-related injuries and deaths.

Red Light Cameras in the United States

Red light cameras are currently in use in approximately 338 U.S. communities, marking a decline from the over 500 cities that operated such systems a decade ago. These programs are permitted in 22 states and the District of Columbia, with large metro areas like New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. leading the way.

Rank	City	Approximate Number of Cameras	Camera Types Used	Notes
1	New York City, NY	2,200+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Largest U.S. program; 750 school zones covered
2	Washington, D.C.	5,000+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Most traffic cameras per capita in the U.S.
3	Chicago, IL	527+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Extensive program; significant revenue from fines
4	San Francisco, CA	33+	Speed Cameras	New program with income-based fines; 50 cameras planned
5	Los Angeles, CA	33+	Speed Cameras	Pilot program initiated; fines based on income
6	Philadelphia, PA	300+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Focus on high-risk intersections
7	Seattle, WA	100+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Active enforcement in school zones
8	Denver, CO	100+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Implemented to reduce accidents
9	Phoenix, AZ	100+	Speed Cameras, Red Light	Comprehensive citywide coverage
10	San Diego, CA	100+	Speed Cameras, Red Light

These cameras are typically placed at high-risk intersections and are credited with reducing angle collisions and red light running violations. In some areas, their effectiveness has led to a decrease in the number of cameras needed over time.

Keywords: red light camera statistics, red light enforcement USA, cities with red light cameras

Speed Cameras in the United States

Speed camera programs are in operation in about 195 U.S. cities, with legal authorization in 19 states and the District of Columbia. These cameras are often deployed in school zones, high-accident corridors, and areas where speeding is a persistent problem.

For example, New York City operates over 2,000 speed cameras near schools. Between 2019 and 2021, data showed a 73% drop in speeding violations at fixed locations, highlighting the effectiveness of the system in reducing dangerous driving.

Keywords: speed camera usage USA, speed enforcement cities, speed cameras near schools

Global Camera Use: Red Light and Speed Enforcement Worldwide

Worldwide, the number of traffic enforcement cameras far exceeds those in the U.S. Combined, there are more than 118,000 red light and speed cameras around the globe.

• Red light cameras worldwide: Over 19,000

• Speed cameras worldwide: Over 80,000

The top countries with the most traffic enforcement cameras include:

Rank	Country	Red Light Cameras	Speed Cameras	Total Cameras
1	Brazil	1,170	14,210	15,380
2	Italy	2,321	8,104	10,425
3	United States	3,974	4,001	7,975
4	United Kingdom	811	4,004	4,815
5	Germany	408	3,869	4,277
6	France	720	2,969	3,689
7	United Arab Emirates	482	2,109	2,591
8	Sweden	0	2,487	2,487
9	Spain	377	1,598	1,975
10	Turkey	70	1,427	1,497
11	Austria	177	1,245	1,422
12	Argentina	470	772	1,242
13	Belgium	68	1,163	1,231
14	Finland	45	1,057	1,102
15	Canada	774	279	1,053
16	Taiwan	308	712	1,020
17	Poland	208	534	742
18	Australia	335	264	599
19	Morocco	7	548	555
20	Croatia	12	513	525

This shows a strong global commitment to improving traffic safety through automated enforcement.

Keywords: global red light camera statistics, worldwide speed camera data, countries with most speed cameras

Legal and Policy Differences

In the U.S., state-level laws govern whether red light and speed cameras can be used. While some states fully embrace these systems, others have banned or heavily restricted them. For example, Texas has prohibited red light cameras, although some cities were allowed to maintain them until contracts expired.

These legal differences make the U.S. a patchwork of enforcement zones, where drivers may face automatic fines in one state but not the next.

Keywords: red light camera laws by state, speed camera legal states, U.S. automated enforcement laws

Conclusion

Red light and speed cameras continue to play a major role in promoting road safety in the U.S. and around the world. While their use is growing globally, adoption in the U.S. remains dependent on local and state policy. Cities that do use these systems have often seen measurable improvements in driver behavior and road safety.

Keywords summary: how many cities use red light cameras, speed camera statistics USA, red light enforcement worldwide, traffic camera usage by country

Are You Sick of Loud Cars and Motorcycles? How to Deal with Noise

Loud cars and motorcycles are a common nuisance in neighborhoods and cities around the world. Whether you're trying to enjoy your backyard, focus on work, or simply relax, the constant noise of revving engines can disrupt your peace. In this article, we’ll explore why loud cars and motorcycles are so common, the harmful effects of noise pollution, the fines and penalties associated with loud vehicles, and the new technology used to detect and deter noise violations.

Why Are Loud Cars and Motorcycles So Noisy?

Understanding why some cars and motorcycles are louder than others can help explain the problem and guide you in finding a solution.

1. Modified Exhaust Systems: Many vehicle enthusiasts intentionally modify their cars and motorcycles with aftermarket exhaust systems. These modifications are often made for aesthetic or performance reasons but can result in extremely loud and disruptive noise levels. In many cases, these modified exhausts violate noise ordinances in residential areas.

2. Engine Type and Design: Motorcycles, particularly sport models, tend to produce louder sounds compared to regular passenger vehicles. The design and power of motorcycle engines, along with their smaller mufflers, contribute to higher noise levels. While it may be enjoyable for the rider, it’s a common source of frustration for anyone nearby.

3. Wear and Tear: Older cars and motorcycles that are not properly maintained can become louder over time. Worn-out mufflers, rusted exhaust pipes, and engine malfunctions can contribute to noise pollution, adding to the disturbance.

The Dangers of Noise Pollution: How Loud Cars and Motorcycles Affect Your Health

Noise from loud vehicles isn't just annoying—it can have a significant impact on your physical and mental health. Here's how:

1. Hearing Damage: Prolonged exposure to loud noises from cars, motorcycles, and other vehicles can lead to hearing loss. Motorcycles with modified exhaust systems, for example, can reach decibel levels that are harmful to your hearing.

2. Increased Stress Levels: Constant exposure to disruptive noises can increase your stress and anxiety levels. Noise pollution has been linked to a rise in cortisol (the stress hormone), which can affect your overall well-being.

3. Sleep Disruptions: One of the most common complaints about loud vehicles is how they affect sleep. The persistent noise from motorcycles and cars can make it difficult to fall asleep or stay asleep, leading to fatigue, irritability, and reduced focus.

4. Mental Health Concerns: Over time, noise pollution can lead to mental health issues such as increased anger, frustration, and depression. For those living in areas with high traffic or heavy vehicle noise, it can feel like a constant source of tension and unrest.

Fines and Penalties for Loud Cars and Motorcycles

To combat the issue of loud vehicles, many cities and states have enacted noise ordinances and established fines for those who violate them. These fines aim to reduce noise pollution and encourage drivers to be more considerate of their impact on their community.

1. Loud Vehicle Fines: Many cities impose fines for vehicles that exceed a certain decibel level. For example, in New York City, drivers can face fines of up to $350 for using a modified exhaust system that exceeds the city’s noise limit. Some areas have stricter rules that can result in even higher fines, especially for repeat offenders.

2. Motorcycle Exhaust Violations: Motorcycles with modified exhaust systems are a major source of noise pollution. In places like California, there are specific rules regarding motorcycle noise emissions. Riders can be fined if their motorcycles exceed certain noise levels, and these fines can escalate depending on the severity of the violation.

3. Vehicle Noise Inspections: In some cities, law enforcement may conduct vehicle noise inspections or set up checkpoints to test the noise levels of vehicles. Vehicles that fail the noise test can face fines or even have their registration revoked.

How Cameras Are Detecting Loud Vehicles

To better enforce noise ordinances, some cities are turning to technology to detect loud cars and motorcycles. One innovative solution is the use of noise detection cameras, which automatically capture data on noisy vehicles.

1. Noise Detection Technology: Noise detection cameras work similarly to speed cameras. They are equipped with microphones and sensors that measure the decibel levels of passing vehicles. If a vehicle exceeds the legal noise threshold, the camera records the event and can automatically issue a ticket to the owner of the vehicle.

2. Global Adoption of Noise Cameras: Countries like the UK and Japan have already begun experimenting with noise detection cameras in high-traffic areas or neighborhoods known for frequent complaints about noise pollution. These cameras provide a more efficient way to monitor and enforce noise laws without requiring law enforcement officers to be physically present.

3. Benefits of Noise Detection Cameras: The introduction of noise cameras helps cities reduce the need for manual enforcement, streamline the process of issuing fines, and ensure that all vehicles are held accountable for their noise levels. It also makes it harder for offenders to argue against the violation since the evidence is captured automatically.

What You Can Do to Reduce the Noise from Loud Cars and Motorcycles

If you’re tired of dealing with the constant noise from loud vehicles, there are practical steps you can take to reduce the disturbance and reclaim your peace.

1. Check Local Noise Ordinances: Many cities have noise regulations that restrict the volume of vehicle noise, including car and motorcycle exhaust systems. Review local noise laws and find out if the loud vehicles in your area are exceeding these limits. If they are, you can file a complaint with local authorities.

2. Advocate for Stricter Noise Regulations: If noise from loud cars and motorcycles is a persistent problem in your neighborhood, consider contacting local government officials or attending city council meetings to advocate for stricter noise control laws. More and more cities are adopting noise ordinances that specifically target modified vehicle exhaust systems.

3. Install Noise Barriers: If the noise from nearby roads is unbearable, installing a noise barrier around your home can be an effective solution. Fences, hedges, and other soundproofing structures can help block some of the noise and provide a quieter environment.

4. Use White Noise or Soundproofing: Inside your home, you can mitigate the impact of loud vehicle noises by using white noise machines or soundproofing your windows. Soundproofing measures, such as double-glazed windows or heavy curtains, can significantly reduce the amount of outside noise that enters your space.

5. Report Loud Vehicles: If you witness cars or motorcycles with excessively loud exhaust systems in your area, report them to local authorities. Many jurisdictions offer an anonymous tip line or online reporting system for noise complaints.

Conclusion: Reclaim Your Peace from Loud Vehicles

Loud cars and motorcycles can be a constant source of frustration, but you don’t have to accept this noise pollution as part of your daily life. By understanding the causes of loud vehicle noise and taking action through local noise ordinances, advocacy, fines, and new detection technology like noise cameras, you can create a quieter, more peaceful environment for yourself and your family. Don’t let the roar of loud engines control your quality of life—take steps today to reduce noise pollution and restore peace to your surroundings.

Understanding Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement: What You Need to Know

Parking ticket photo enforcement has become an increasingly common practice in many cities across the United States and beyond. This automated system captures images of vehicles parked in violation of local regulations, making it easier for municipalities to enforce parking laws without the need for a parking attendant. In this article, we will delve into how parking ticket photo enforcement works, its benefits and drawbacks, and what drivers should know to avoid getting ticketed.

How Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement Works

Parking ticket photo enforcement systems use automated cameras and technology to monitor parking violations. Here’s how the process typically unfolds:

1. Camera Installation: Cities install cameras in high-traffic areas, near parking meters, or at locations with a history of parking violations. These cameras are often equipped with license plate recognition software.

2. Monitoring: The cameras continuously monitor parked vehicles. When a vehicle is detected in a restricted area or when time expires at a metered space, the camera captures images of the vehicle, including its license plate.

3. Ticket Generation: Once a violation is detected, the system automatically generates a parking ticket. The images captured by the camera, along with relevant details such as the date, time, and location of the violation, are typically included in the ticket.

4. Notification: The vehicle owner is then notified of the parking ticket, usually by mail or through an online portal. This notification includes instructions for payment or contesting the ticket.

Benefits of Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement

Parking ticket photo enforcement systems offer several advantages for cities and drivers alike:

• Increased Efficiency: Automated systems allow cities to enforce parking regulations without the need for parking attendants. This can free up resources for other important city functions.

• Reduced Human Error: Automated ticketing reduces the chances of human error that can occur with manual enforcement. This can lead to more accurate ticketing.

• Consistency: Automated systems provide consistent enforcement of parking regulations. This helps deter violations and promotes compliance among drivers.

• Improved Revenue: For municipalities, photo enforcement can lead to increased revenue from parking fines, which can be reinvested into local services and infrastructure.

Drawbacks of Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement

Despite the benefits, parking ticket photo enforcement is not without its drawbacks:

• Public Outcry: Many drivers feel that automated ticketing systems can be unfair and may lead to excessive ticketing. This has sparked debates about the ethics of photo enforcement.

• Lack of Human Judgment: Automated systems cannot take into account the unique circumstances of each violation, which may lead to tickets being issued for legitimate situations, such as emergency stops or vehicle malfunctions.

• Privacy Concerns: The use of cameras to monitor parking can raise privacy issues for some individuals, leading to concerns about surveillance and data security.

Tips to Avoid Parking Tickets from Photo Enforcement

To minimize the risk of receiving a parking ticket through photo enforcement, consider the following tips:

1. Know the Rules: Familiarize yourself with local parking regulations, including time limits, restricted zones, and metered parking requirements.

2. Pay Attention to Signage: Always check for parking signs that indicate restrictions in the area. These signs will inform you of the rules in place and help you avoid violations.

3. Set Timers: If you park at a metered space, consider setting a timer on your phone to remind you when it’s time to move your vehicle or add time to the meter.

4. Use Alternative Transportation: When possible, consider using public transportation, carpooling, or ride-sharing services to avoid parking challenges altogether.

What to Do If You Receive a Parking Ticket

If you receive a parking ticket from a photo enforcement system, here are the steps you can take:

1. Review the Ticket: Check the ticket for accuracy. Ensure that the details, such as the date, time, and location of the violation, are correct.

2. Examine the Evidence: Most tickets issued through photo enforcement will include images of your vehicle. Review these images to confirm whether the violation occurred.

3. Consider Contesting the Ticket: If you believe the ticket was issued in error, you can contest it. Follow your city’s procedure for appealing a parking ticket, which may involve providing evidence or attending a hearing.

4. Pay the Fine: If you decide not to contest the ticket, make sure to pay the fine promptly to avoid late fees or additional penalties.

Conclusion

Parking ticket photo enforcement is an effective tool for municipalities to manage parking regulations and enhance compliance. While it offers benefits like increased efficiency and reduced human error, it also raises questions about fairness and privacy. By understanding how these systems work and taking proactive steps, drivers can minimize their chances of receiving a parking ticket and navigate city streets more confidently. Always stay informed about local parking regulations and pay attention to signage to ensure a hassle-free parking experience.

Cities Trying To Use Photo Ticketing For Parking

Drivers be warned: In the perpetual cat-and-mouse war between parking enforcement and motorists trying to park without getting a ticket in this city, the cat just got a powerful new weapon. The city of Newton, a suburb of Boston, is installing video cameras that can detect when a car has been parked in a metered spot too long. According to a story in The Boston Globe, the devices alert parking enforcement officers if a ticket needs to be written.

Automatic license plate recognition — a kind of RoboCop of the parking world that uses a panoramic video camera, laptop computer, and sophisticated software — detects cars that have been parked too long and sounds an alert to write a ticket.

The city bought three systems for $50,000 and plans to install them in parking enforcement vehicles this month. Officials believe the technology could double the number of parking tickets the city writes each year and sharply increase the $1.8 million in annual parking fees it collects.  

Related posts:
Photo Enforced Parking Tickets Are Coming
Parking Ticket for Street Sweeping

Do Red Light Cameras Cause More Rear-End Crashes?

The impact of red light cameras on rear-end crashes:

Chicago Red Light Camera Revenue & Locations Summary

Red light cameras in Chicago are operating in at 84 communities across the city in Illinois. In some towns, traffic fines are now making up a large portion of revenue.  Data compiled by the Illinois Policy Institute reveals the top 10 towns raking it in when you roll through the red.

1. Chicago: $719,709,862.61 since 2008. 309 cameras currently operational
2. Berywn: $19,295,681.12 since 2009. 2 cameras currently operational
3. Lakemoor: $19,265,169.70 since 2012. 3 cameras currently operational
4. Country Club Hills: $16,530,455.18 since 2009. 7 cameras currently operational
5. North Riverside: $16,003,864.38 since 2014. 3 cameras currently operational
6. Aurora: $13,139,200.68 since 2010. 9 cameras currently operational.
7. Crestwood: $13,085,742.32 since 2016. 8 cameras currently operational.
8. Hillside: $12,138,530.97 since 2010. 5 cameras currently operational.
9. Burbank: $10,958,681.32 since 2014. 5 cameras currently operational.
10. Gurnee: $10,823,643.36 since 2009. 15 cameras currently operational.

Where does this money go and how is it used?  Comments appreciated below. 

How Many People Are Injured Each Year By Drivers Running Red Lights?

Most Dangerous Cities Drivers Running Red Lights

Researchers found that violations dropped by 36% after yellow lights were extended to give drivers more warning that the light was about to turn red. After red light cameras were added, the remaining violations dropped by 96%.  

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the United States, running red lights is a significant cause of traffic collisions and injuries. While I don't have access to the most recent statistics, I can provide you with some general information based on historical data.

In 2019, the NHTSA reported that there were 846 fatalities and an estimated 139,000 injuries caused by red-light running collisions in the United States. These numbers include not only the drivers who ran the red lights but also occupants of other vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists who were involved in these incidents.

Extending the duration of yellow lights at traffic intersections can be an effective measure for reducing red light violations. Research studies have indeed shown that extending the duration of yellow lights can lead to a decrease in violations and subsequent red light running incidents.

One notable study conducted by the Texas Transportation Institute in 2004 examined the impact of extended yellow signal timings at intersections. The study found that when yellow light durations were increased by just one second, red light violations decreased by an average of 36%.

The reason behind this reduction is that a longer yellow light duration provides drivers with more time to react and safely come to a stop before the light turns red. It allows drivers to make informed decisions and reduces the likelihood of last-minute attempts to cross the intersection.

These findings support the idea that adjusting signal timings, including extending the duration of yellow lights, can have a positive impact on traffic safety by reducing red light violations and related collisions. Implementing such changes requires careful analysis, considering factors such as intersection design, traffic flow, and driver behavior to determine appropriate signal timings that promote safety and efficiency.

Red Light Camera Costs Uncovered

The two largest red-light camera operators Verra Mobility (Formerly ATS )and Redflex will likely do more than $200M in revenue in 2010 just in the U.S.  This could be a very light estimate based on the lack of transparency on the number of cameras in operation. I know for a fact the information they provide on their web sites is out of date.

Here is how we calculated it:  Redflex charges $4,396 per month and American Traffic Solutions (ATS) charges $4,750 per month per camera according to many news articles around the U.S. Multiple the amount of revenue per camera per month and you come up with an estimate of what the company will do in revenue in 2010. Based on our calculations ATS likely has more than 2,000 cameras in operation and therefore will likely do about $108M in revenue in 2010 and Redflex has reportedly more than 1,700 cameras in operation and therefore will do around $89M according to our estimates.

Other companies like Red Speed charge $1,499 per month per camera according to news articles.

Can Motorcycles Avoid Red Light Camera Tickets?

The price for running a red light might be life or death on a motorcycle but can they still get tickets?  I watched a man die after running a red light on his motorcycle this winter. He crashed his motorcycle into a car turning left as he tried to run the red light in Palm Desert this winter. It sparked a question whether motorcycles are heavy enough to set off the red light camera sensors? According to the red light camera operators they are supposed to pick up motorcycles. So if they do get tickets can the cameras capture the image and identify the driver's face inside a helmet? Are the cameras capable of capturing an image if the rider is traveling at a high rate of speed?  

Each Camera Earns $90K per Month in New Jersey

Linden City officials tell The Star-Ledger of Newark that the city has collected more than $800,000 in fines in the first three months of issuing tickets. Almost 20,000 tickets have been mailed out. Linden has cameras in operation at three intersections, two on Routes 1 & 9 and one on Route 27. The fine is somewhere between $75 to $140 as reported by drivers.

Linden police officer said the cameras appear to be improving safety as well. Sgt. Michael Babulski said there has been only one accident at the intersections with the cameras since they were activated.

How to Tell if You Got a Red Light Camera Ticket

Red light camera tickets typically take from 3-7 business days to process and are mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.  We recommend waiting until the ticket arrives in the mail before trying to find out ahead of time.  Some people just don't have the patience to wait and if the matter is urgent we recommend calling one of the local police departments listed in the directory below or by dialing 311 on your phone.  Please do not dial 911 on your phone as the operator will not accept your call because getting a ticket is not an emergency requiring dispatch.  Unfortunately, most Police departments are not equipped to handle this type of customer service so expect the worst when you take on this endeavor.  You can also try searching the databases of PhotoNotice.com and Atsol.com.   Also, PhotoEnforced.com does not own, operate or run any of the cameras and we are simply a database of the locations.  Please do not email us with questions asking if you received a ticket because we do not currently have any way of verifying them.  

Local Police Phone Number Directory

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois

Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana

Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island

South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Why Our Competitors Claim Crowdsourcing Sucks

I have to laugh every time I see one of our competitors claim: "Our red light camera database is the best because OUR locations are verified."  It's a big fat lie and a half-truth.  Here is a recent quote by a "no-name" company in their press release:   "Unlike other safety cameras that use inferior databases which often depend heavily on unqualified and frequently incorrect user input, or old, expired data, the database contains data points that are continually verified through research and a network of professionals. The new camera locations are not just added to, earlier data points but are verified for continued relevance and are removed if they are found to be no longer in force. Our database was named the most accurate safety cam database in a recent category test."

10 things you should substantiate before licensing data from a competitive red light camera database:

1) Verification of 3,000-7,000 locations with all 500+ cities, municipalities, and counties is a LIE.

2) No sources or history for their data being added, removed, and/or methodology for gathering data (thieves)

3) No info on the number of locations in the database (fear of being incomplete)

4) No volunteers on the ground in the hundreds of municipalities (no goodwill)

5) No press coverage and blogger or user credibility (because they copy)

6) Refusal to have a "bake-off" competition to substantiate their data (fear of being wrong)

7) We were the U.S. pioneers in 2001 which is 3 times longer than any competitor (late to the game)

8) PhotoEnforced.com has had well over one million people visit our site (brand recognition)

9) Google Street maps pictures are old and cannot verify new cameras (nice try)

10) Business models borrowed from Europe which has 40K (5x) locations (Google Ads changing the game)

We have by far the most complete database of 7000+ locations contrary to what the companies with deep pockets and PR will try to promote. What our competitors don't know is that we have a public database and a private database for our customers. Our public database is 95% accurate but there are some phantom locations purposely inserted to keep thieves from copying the entire database which has been done many times. Just to be clear we encourage individual users to download and use the data in their local markets and give us accurate feedback for free.

Over time we eventually ferret out false locations because of our enormous consumer reach of nearly 1,000 ticketed drivers per each day visit our website. We think more than half of people who think they receive tickets look online at our site for sources to verify the locations and come to our site first from a Google search engine query.  Also, we have had numerous former employees from each company tell us that they in fact they use Photoenforced.com as their primary source of data.

If any competitors would like to post a rebuttal to my accusations please do so below.

Blinding Flashes a Nuisance for Motorists

Red-light cameras have become a nuisance for some motorists in the area of Interstate 25 and Lincoln Avenue in Lone Tree, Colorado.

Lone Tree Voice By Chris Michlewicz, Published: 02.12.10

Authorities expect the devices to reduce accidents and traffic congestion. Those who drive along Lincoln Avenue near the I-25 interchange might have seen the bright flashes of light coming from bulbs mounted on light poles at Lincoln and Park Meadows Drive and Lincoln and the highway’s northbound off-ramp, known as San Luis Street. The intersections were identified in a study as problem areas: Lincoln and Park Meadows Drive for congestion, and Lincoln and San Luis for frequent crashes. Lone Tree officials decided to correct the problem by enlisting the services of American Traffic Solutions, which installed and maintains the cameras, prepares violation notices, provides the software for violation approval, and collects fines on behalf of the city’s police department.

Since the first set of cameras was placed at Lincoln and Park Meadows Drive in July 2008, Lone Tree has collected $218,000 in fines. That includes numbers from the second and third sets of cameras, which were installed in November. The cameras, however, have proven effective. There is less bottlenecking at the Lincoln and Park Meadows Drive intersection, an issue that caused major back-ups for eastbound and westbound traffic on Lincoln. Statistics on the number of accidents are not yet available, said Sgt. Scott Cavenah, traffic supervisor for the Lone Tree Police Department.

But some motorists are upset about what they call blinding flashes of light, even when there are no vehicles in the intersection. Parker resident David Wilson said he became aware of the cameras as he sat at a red light on westbound Lincoln last summer. While he applauds efforts to improve safety, Wilson believes the cameras could eventually end up causing an accident. “What I can’t understand is the random timing of the photos being taken,” he said. “I watched it flash twice when there was no one even violating the law.” A city spokesperson attributed the “random” flashes to the system “recalibrating” itself. Wilson said the flashes can be distracting to motorists, especially out-of-towners who might not be aware they are present.

The Lincoln and San Luis intersection was found to be a hotspot for regular violations. The study found a high accident rate, a large number of violations during the research period, and significant congestion. Furthermore, officers could not effectively work at the intersection because of its design. Cavenah has collected data on the intersection but said the numbers are too preliminary to determine whether the red-light cameras have been effective. “A better comparison can be made once we get at least one-year’s worth of data to review,” he said in an update sent via e-mail. The annual expense to Lone Tree for all three cameras is $180,000. The city ultimately hopes to gain voluntary compliance with the traffic laws and maintain better traffic flow in the area.

Wilson would prefer to see the cameras removed, but expects to see more of them in the Denver metro area in the coming years. “Unfortunately, I think things are going that way,” he said. “They are the cops. They can pretty much do whatever they want.”

Los Angeles Fines May Be Reduced

Los Angeles Times, February 12, 2010

San Fernando Valley Councilman Dennis Zine would lower fines for red-light violations in L.A.

Councilman says drivers' fines will go down and city revenue will go up if the city processes its own tickets. The county and state are likely to fight the plan, which would decrease their revenue.  Tens of thousands of Los Angeles motorists could see reduced fines for red-light violations -- now hovering around $500 with traffic school fees -- under an unusual proposal presented Wednesday at City Hall.

San Fernando Valley Councilman Dennis Zine introduced a motion to study the feasibility of taking the processing of the city's red-light infractions, and possibly other traffic tickets, out of the hands of the county court system. Such a move could reduce the fines, some of which have risen at three times the rate of inflation in recent years, and increase revenue to the city, Zine said.

The tactic has been quietly adopted by a handful of California towns, but none the size of Los Angeles.

The proposal could trigger a fight with the cash-strapped state as well as judicial agencies, both of which could lose millions in revenue from Los Angeles' red-light tickets. Some have questioned the legality of such city-run adjudication programs.

Red-light ticket revenues have grown in recent years as dozens of California cities have turned to automated photo enforcement systems to monitor intersections around the clock. Los Angeles issues about 3,600 red-light violations per month, just with its camera systems; most have been for rolling right turns.

Los Angeles police officials report that the city netted more than $6 million last year from its photo enforcement program.

Zine, a former Los Angeles traffic officer, has been critical of the jump in red-light fines, which are set by state and county agencies.

The fines have become punitive, he argues, particularly for families struggling in the economic downturn. He noted that the city receives only about one-third -- less than $150 -- of the total fine levied for the red-light tickets its officer's issue, while on patrol or via camera systems.

Courts might benefit from his proposal because they are overloaded and reducing days of operation, Zine said in an interview. A Los Angeles County Superior Court spokesperson was not available for comment.

Under the proposal, the city would conduct its own administrative hearings on the tickets. Drivers would still get points for violations reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles, he said. The proposal will be initially considered by the council's Public Safety and Budget committees.

LA May Add Speed Speed Cameras

Los Angeles might expand the red-light camera program and add speed cameras. The plan would boost revenue, but city officials say it's safety-driven.

Published by LA Times By Rich Connell, February 3, 2010

Los Angeles' red-light traffic camera program, which officials report netted more than $6 million last year after expenses, could be significantly expanded under a new contract to be negotiated over the next 14 months, records and interviews show.  Are Traffic Cameras Legal In Los Angeles, California?

While adding more cameras could offer a welcome boost to city revenue in the midst of a fiscal crisis, officials say any expansion will be based on safety considerations.

No goal has been set, but internal City Hall discussions have included the possibility of adding cameras to blocks of eight intersections at a time and eventually doubling the overall reach of the program to 64 intersections, Los Angeles Police Department officials told The Times.

Fresh details of the discussions emerged as the Police Commission on Tuesday sent the City Council a recommendation to issue bid requests from vendors to operate -- and presumably enlarge -- the program starting next year.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for traffic cameras to be modified to also catch speeders, part of an effort to raise $300 million in fines to help close the state's budget shortfall. 

Los Angeles officials have voiced mixed reactions but taken no formal action on the proposal.

As for red-light cameras, critics contend that the safety benefits have been overstated and that the cameras chiefly are used to fatten government coffers. Those complaints have grown louder as red-light ticket fines have climbed sharply in recent years. They now total more than $500 in Los Angeles County when traffic school fees are included.

But LAPD officials and some experts say photo enforcement reduces potentially serious red-light-running accidents, changes driver behavior for the better and frees up patrol officers for other tasks.

And after struggling with construction delays and start-up and early operating expenses, Los Angeles' red-light cameras have begun producing a sorely needed revenue surplus at a time when city programs and payrolls are being slashed.

Beyond payments of about $2 million to the city's camera vendor and $1.2 million for Police Department costs, the city's 32 camera-equipped intersections generated $6.4 million in net revenue in 2009, said LAPD Sgt. Matthew MacWillie, who oversees the program. The LAPD issues about 3,600 photo enforcement tickets a month, records show.

The program's financial turnaround can be partially attributed to a decision 18 months ago to more than double fines for rolling right-turn violations, which MacWillie has acknowledged account for most violations caught by the cameras.

Previously, Los Angeles had been the only city in the county to charge right turn violations under a vehicle code section that carried a $156 fine. When the LAPD brought its ticketing practices in line with other agencies, right turn fines jumped to $381. The city's share of the fines grew from $58 to nearly $150.

At least one City Council member, Valley representative Dennis Zine, said pursuing bids to continue or expand the photo enforcement program is premature.

He said a detailed study of overall accident rates at photo-equipped intersections was still in the works. "I don't want to do anything until we get the results of that inquiry," he said.

Zine, a former LAPD traffic cop who sits on the council's Public Safety Committee, sought the analysis last year after a local television station reported that the city's red-light cameras haven't always reduced collisions. The LAPD's study is not expected to be completed for about a month.

But MacWillie said Tuesday that data show overall accidents, as well as red-light-running accidents, have declined at camera-equipped intersections.

Considered a key city expert on photo enforcement, MacWillie also said speed cameras can be a valuable traffic enforcement tool if properly focused on safety and altering driver behavior. Approximately 40 people die annually in speed-related accidents in the city, he said.

Zine said putting speed cameras at intersections is an "absurd idea" that would undermine the traditional focus of police officers on public safety.

The governor is "just saying this is a revenue producer," he said.

"With that in mind, why don't we just charge everyone $10 when they start their engine?"

Does NAVTEQ Steal POI Data?

We would like to alleviate some of the confusion in the marketplace. Navteq is NOT currently a customer of PhotoEnforced.com and we have no idea where they have acquired their data from.

However, PhotoEnforced.com has been the #1 sole source and pioneer of gathering red light camera and speed camera locations in a free open database since 2001. There are many databases in the market described above that copy our data and use this data and sell it. If you are considering licensing or using the NAVTEQ speed and red light camera locations database you might want to ask them the following questions first . . .

1) Why are you missing about 1000+ locations?
2) What sources for acquiring the original 5000 locations?
3) Are your sources for the data-stealing content?
4) Sources for updates on new locations and changes?
5) Proprietary research (?) when PhotoEnforced.com is free?
6) Any right turn and red light camera/speed combo cameras?
7) Why did it take you so many years to release a product?
8) Can you deliver updates to the locations in real-time?
9) How do you charge for the database?
10) Publishing fines with the location be a copyright violation?

NAVTEQ, the leading global provider of digital map, traffic, and location data for in-vehicle, portable, wireless, and enterprise solutions, announced today at Telematics Detroit 2009 speed and red light camera locations are now available for the NAVTEQ(R) map of North America. NAVTEQ Camera Alert(TM) includes up-to-date information about the exact location of speed limit cameras, red-light cameras, as well as combined speed and red light cameras in 5,000 locations throughout North America and Australia.

"Automated cameras are proliferating across North American cities," stated Cindy Paulauskas, vice president of America's map and content products, NAVTEQ. "And our proprietary research indicates that these types of warnings are a highly valued feature in countries where this navigation system functionality is available. Providing our customers with quality North America camera location information helps enable solutions that give drivers better knowledge of maximum speeds and traffic signals - with alerts at the right place and at the right time."

See related posts:
Cobra Electronics Licensing Data to Navteq?
Red Light & Speed Cameras POI Database

Speed Camera Vans In Operation

Here is a great video that describes the operation of a mobile speed photo enforced van in Chicago. There are five photo enforcement vans across the state of Illinois. The speed enforcement vans proved more effective than placing electronic radar signs on the highway shoulder to show drivers their real-time speed, or even deploying police cars to sit on the side of the road, the research found.

The Illinois State Police photo vans are capable of identifying scores of speeding scofflaws across multiple lanes of traffic in only a few minutes, ringing up minimum of $375 speeding tickets that are sent in the mail for the work-zone violations. It's a process law-enforcement officials say is much more efficient—and safer for police officers—than pulling over individual speeders as traffic rushes past.

In addition, it's a mystery to drivers how much leeway is given above the 45 m.p.h. construction zone speed limit. Does going 50 m.p.h. trigger a ticket, or do you have to be speeding at 10 m.p.h. above the work zone speed limit? The answer changes from one jurisdiction to another.

Views From Both Sides Of The Road

Supporters of red light cameras say…

• According to the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS), drivers who run red lights account for 22% of all traffic accidents in the United States.
• An IIHS study in Oxnard, California showed that red-light running violations dropped 42% after red light cameras were introduced. A similar study in Fairfax, Virginia showed violations declined 40% after one year after.
• Publicity of red light cameras deters violations.
• Red-light cameras don’t have biases and therefore drivers cannot be unfairly profiled.
• Privacy issues are null because of the public setting. Also, only people violating the law are photographed.
• They make lots of money for cities in need of revenue.

Those who oppose the use of red-light cameras say . . . 

• The owner might not have been driving the car, yet they are mailed the owner of the ticket.
• Cameras increase other types of accidents, such as rear-ending collisions, when people notice the camera and make hasty decisions to avoid ticketing. A Virginia Transportation Research Council study shows an increase in accidents with the installment of red light cameras.
• Longer yellow lights can make intersections much safer, in an easy and inexpensive way (check out the findings of the Texas Transportation Institute)
• There is no standardization of yellow light duration and several cities have been caught shortening them around a red light camera to increase revenue.
• Insurance companies (including IIHS) support red-light cameras because more tickets mean they can raise insurance rates
• The accused receive notification weeks after the violation and there are no human witnesses to analyze the whole situation.
  
• They are expensive to operate and service the tickets in our court system.
  
• There are not stands to the fines through the U.S. which range from $50-$400.

Thank you to our friends at Beat The Traffic Blog for putting together this info . . .