Showing posts with label Traffic School. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Traffic School. Show all posts

License Plate Hunter Cameras: How They Work & Where They're Used

License plate hunter cameras—formally known as Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR)—are specialized surveillance systems designed to automatically capture and analyze license plate data in real time. As discussed in PhotoEnforced's original article, these devices are often mistaken for speed or red-light cameras, but their primary function is vehicle identification rather than issuing direct traffic tickets.

In the last decade, ALPR systems have become a common sight on highways, at toll booths, in parking garages, and even in residential neighborhoods. Their rapid adoption is driven by their ability to process thousands of license plates per hour, integrate with vast databases, and provide immediate alerts to authorities when a match is found.

How License Plate Hunter Cameras Work

The core technology behind ALPR involves a high-resolution camera paired with optical character recognition (OCR) software. This combination allows the system to “read” license plates, regardless of whether the vehicle is moving at high speed or parked. Infrared imaging is frequently used so the system can function in darkness, rain, fog, or glare conditions.

When a plate is captured, the system typically records:

  • The license plate number
  • Date and time of capture
  • GPS coordinates or fixed location data
  • A photo of the vehicle (often showing make, model, and color)

The recorded information is then compared against one or more databases. These may include stolen vehicle lists, active warrant notices, wanted persons alerts, unpaid toll violations, or other watchlists. Matches can trigger real-time alerts to patrol officers or dispatch centers.

Key Applications of ALPR Technology

  1. Law Enforcement: Police departments use ALPR to detect stolen vehicles, track suspects, locate missing persons, and solve crimes. A single patrol car equipped with ALPR can scan thousands of plates per shift.
  2. Toll Collection: Many toll roads have eliminated cash booths entirely, relying on ALPR to identify vehicles and bill the registered owner.
  3. Parking Management: In garages and municipal lots, ALPR automates entry and exit logging, enforces permit requirements, and streamlines payment verification.
  4. Private Security: Gated communities, corporate campuses, and logistics hubs use ALPR to monitor and log all vehicle entries and exits, enhancing security without adding guard staff.
  5. Traffic Analysis: Transportation departments use ALPR data to monitor congestion patterns, calculate travel times, and plan roadway improvements.

Advantages of License Plate Hunter Cameras

ALPR systems deliver benefits that manual observation cannot match:

  • Continuous operation, day and night
  • Rapid, automated identification without human intervention
  • Integration with national, state, and local databases
  • Long-term storage for investigative purposes
  • Ability to process large traffic volumes efficiently

These strengths have made ALPR a cornerstone of modern traffic enforcement and vehicle monitoring efforts.

Privacy & Legal Concerns

Despite their utility, license plate hunter cameras have drawn criticism from privacy advocates and civil liberties organizations. The core concern is that ALPR allows mass surveillance of ordinary drivers without their knowledge or consent. Specific issues include:

  • Data Retention: In some jurisdictions, plate scans are deleted after 48 hours; in others, they may be kept for years.
  • Access Control: Questions remain over who can access the data and whether it is shared with private companies or other government agencies.
  • Potential for Abuse: Without strict oversight, ALPR data could be misused for tracking individuals for non-law-enforcement purposes.

Some U.S. states have passed laws regulating ALPR usage, retention, and sharing, while others have yet to address the technology in legislation. Court rulings have also begun to shape the legal boundaries, with some judges questioning whether prolonged, warrantless tracking violates the Fourth Amendment.

Where You’ll Find ALPR Cameras

License plate hunter cameras can be either fixed or mobile. Common installation points include:

  • Highway overpasses
  • Traffic signals and busy intersections
  • Toll plazas and express lanes
  • School safety zones
  • Police patrol vehicles
  • Parking garage entrances and exits
  • Industrial or residential gated entries

In mobile form, ALPR cameras mounted on police cruisers can scan vehicles parked along streets or traveling nearby in real time.

Case Study: Neighborhood ALPR Networks

Some private companies have expanded ALPR into residential security. For example, Flock Safety operates networks in thousands of U.S. neighborhoods, capturing billions of license plate scans each month. These systems are marketed as tools to reduce crime by sharing data directly with local police departments when a match occurs. Supporters cite significant reductions in burglary and theft rates, while critics raise concerns about continuous tracking and the absence of clear opt-out options for residents.

Potential Risks and Misidentification

ALPR accuracy is generally high, but it is not flawless. Misreads can occur due to dirty or damaged plates, unusual fonts, lighting conditions, or obstructions. In rare cases, such errors have led to mistaken stops or arrests, underscoring the need for human verification before taking enforcement action.

Future Trends in License Plate Recognition

ALPR technology continues to evolve rapidly. Artificial intelligence now enables systems to identify vehicles by make, model, and color in addition to plate numbers. Predictive analytics may soon allow law enforcement to anticipate vehicle movements based on past patterns. Smaller, cheaper units are making it possible to install ALPR in more locations, including portable units for temporary deployments.

As cities adopt “smart traffic” infrastructure, ALPR data is likely to be integrated with other sources such as traffic sensors, GPS feeds, and even facial recognition systems. These integrations promise greater efficiency in traffic management and public safety but will also raise deeper privacy debates.

Balancing Security and Privacy

License plate hunter cameras can make communities safer, speed up investigations, and modernize transportation systems. However, unchecked deployment risks eroding public trust. Policymakers, law enforcement, and private operators must balance the legitimate benefits of ALPR with strong safeguards to prevent misuse.

Transparency measures such as public notice of camera locations, limits on data retention, and independent audits can help ensure that the technology serves the public good without compromising individual freedoms.

Conclusion

License plate hunter cameras have transformed vehicle monitoring from a manual process into a sophisticated, automated system capable of scanning and analyzing vast amounts of data instantly. Whether used by police, toll agencies, parking operators, or private security, these systems are now a permanent feature of modern transportation networks. The challenge moving forward will be ensuring that their use aligns with both public safety needs and the fundamental right to privacy.

Public Records Resistance in Iowa

freedom of information

Access to public records is a fundamental right in many parts of the world, essential for transparency and accountability. In Iowa, however, there are increasing concerns about resistance to releasing certain types of public data, especially regarding traffic enforcement records, such as those from speed cameras and red-light cameras. Understanding the challenges surrounding public records in Iowa can help residents, journalists, and advocates push for more transparent practices. This article explores the barriers to public records access in Iowa, why these records are crucial, and how the state compares with others on this issue.

Why Public Records Matter in Iowa

Public records are essential for government transparency, giving the public insight into how taxpayer money is used and providing accountability for government actions. In Iowa, traffic enforcement records—such as data from red-light and speed cameras—can help the public understand enforcement patterns, assess traffic safety programs, and hold institutions accountable for the use of automated traffic cameras.

Access to these records allows Iowans to:

  • Verify enforcement accuracy: Errors in traffic citations can be challenged when records are accessible.
  • Hold public agencies accountable: Review agencies’ spending on traffic enforcement, especially in areas where automated cameras are in use.
  • Evaluate public safety effectiveness: Determine if red-light or speed cameras actually improve road safety or if they disproportionately generate revenue without substantial safety benefits.

Challenges to Public Records Access in Iowa

Despite these benefits, Iowa has seen resistance from some government agencies in releasing public records. Here are some key challenges to accessing this information:

  1. Privacy Concerns

    • Iowa agencies cite privacy as a primary reason for restricting access to traffic enforcement data. While privacy protection is essential, Iowa’s laws sometimes overly restrict information, leaving residents unable to assess how public resources are used.
  2. Cost of Access

    • In many cases, obtaining public records can incur high fees, often justified by the need to cover the time and labor required to produce the information. These costs can deter ordinary citizens from accessing data and reduce public scrutiny.
  3. Lack of Transparency in Record-Keeping

    • Record-keeping practices can sometimes be inconsistent or lack transparency, making it difficult to track down specific information. When agencies aren’t required to provide detailed reports, it leads to inconsistencies in data accessibility.
  4. Limited Resources for Records Requests

    • Agencies often claim limited resources to handle records requests in a timely manner. This results in delays that can take weeks, months, or even years, effectively rendering some data unusable for time-sensitive investigations or reports.

How Iowa’s Public Records Resistance Compares with Other States

Public records laws vary widely across the United States. Some states have robust systems in place to ensure data accessibility, while others, like Iowa, place significant hurdles before citizens. Here’s how Iowa compares with other states:

  • Stricter Regulations: While states like California have relatively accessible public records laws, Iowa has stricter regulations that can hinder transparency, particularly around automated traffic enforcement data.
  • Higher Fees for Access: States like Texas offer many public records at minimal costs, making it easy for residents to access data. In Iowa, however, fees can sometimes be prohibitively high.
  • Lengthy Processing Times: States with better funding and streamlined procedures, like Washington, allow for quicker processing of public records requests. Iowa's process, however, can take significantly longer, adding frustration for those seeking timely data.

Potential Solutions for Improving Public Records Access in Iowa

  1. Revisiting Privacy Laws: Updating laws to maintain a balance between privacy and transparency can ensure that the public gets access to essential information without compromising individual privacy rights.

  2. Standardizing Record-Keeping Practices: By implementing standardized record-keeping practices across all agencies, Iowa can reduce discrepancies and improve data consistency, making it easier for residents to locate information.

  3. Streamlining the Request Process: Simplifying the request process through online portals and efficient systems can speed up response times and reduce bureaucratic red tape.

  4. Reducing Access Fees: Lowering or eliminating fees for public records requests, especially for journalists and researchers, would encourage transparency and public oversight.

  5. Implementing a Digital Database: Iowa could establish a centralized digital repository where non-sensitive public records are available on demand, without needing to request them individually.

Why Public Records Matter to Iowa Residents

Ultimately, public records serve the public’s interest by promoting government accountability and transparency. For Iowans, having access to enforcement data can shed light on traffic safety initiatives, guide public opinion on automated enforcement, and influence local and state-level policy decisions.

Conclusion

While Iowa faces challenges in providing transparent access to public records, particularly in traffic enforcement, progress can be made with targeted reforms. Balancing privacy with transparency, reducing fees, and improving response times are all achievable goals that would bring Iowa closer to an open-access model. By addressing these issues, Iowa can ensure its citizens have the information they need to make informed decisions and hold government agencies accountable.

Red Light Cameras About Tax or Safety First?

Tax vs Safety
The primary purpose of red-light cameras is generally focused on safety rather than generating tax revenue. Red-light cameras are typically installed at intersections with a history of red-light violations and a higher risk of accidents. The intention behind their use is to discourage drivers from running red lights, which is a dangerous behavior that can lead to severe accidents and injuries.

The safety benefits associated with red-light cameras include reducing the number of T-bone collisions, improving intersection safety, and deterring red-light violations. Studies have shown that red-light cameras can contribute to a decrease in red-light running incidents and related crashes.

While red-light camera programs may generate revenue from the fines imposed on violators, the emphasis is typically placed on safety rather than using them as a revenue-generating tool. However, it is essential for communities and authorities to implement and maintain red-light camera programs transparently and with clear guidelines to ensure that the primary focus remains on improving road safety.

It's worth noting that the motivation behind red-light camera programs may vary depending on the jurisdiction, and there can be debates and discussions about their effectiveness and fairness. Public opinion and local policies can influence the implementation and operation of red-light camera programs in different regions.

5 Reasons to Hire a Traffic Violation Lawyer

Whether you’re trying to get out of a traffic ticket or a DUI, it might not be as easily achieved without the help of someone who knows the law from cover to cover. There could be serious ramifications and fines waiting for you on the other side. 

Below we’re giving you five (5) reasons to hire a traffic violation lawyer to represent you in court.

Why Should You Hire a Traffic Lawyer?

There are over 41 million Americans receiving traffic tickets each year. 

Although some violations may be straightforward and less difficult to resolve, some cases — such as personal injury/accidents, for example — are serious and can potentially send you to the pen. 

If you’re unsure whether you should get a traffic lawyer to handle your case, these five reasons might help end your confusion. 

1.    You don’t understand traffic laws.

People often underestimate traffic laws, but they are (in reality) very complex. Furthermore, they change quite often. And while it’s possible to go through books and research things to help with your current situation, there’s only so much you can do without the help of a professional.

legal binders

Traffic violation lawyers have a thorough understanding of constitutional issues, federal laws, and state and local traffic laws. They have a strong grasp of the intricacies and specifics of traffic violations and can help you find a solid resolution to your case. 

2.    You want to save money.

Some people might see hiring a traffic lawyer as an unnecessary cost, but it can actually save you a ton of money in the long run.

money

Experienced traffic lawyers can help you lower fines (or even get out of it), as well as remove traffic tickets/points from your driving record, which can potentially raise your insurance premiums. 

3.    You were in a traffic accident caused by another driver.

A lot of accidents happen because one driver wasn’t following road rules as they should. 

According to a 2016 survey conducted by the Insurance Information Institute (III), an estimated 63% of accidents were the result of a traffic violation. Several of the most common traffic violations that result in accidents or personal injury are: 

       Failure to yield

       Following too closely

       Speeding

       Cell phone use

       Failing to obey signs and signals

       Driving under the influence (DUI) 

Working with a licensed traffic lawyer can help you gather viable proof and determine fault after a traffic violation. 

Learn more about personal accidents and traffic violations from Schmidt & Clark. Visit their homepage for details. 

4.    You’re aiming for an alternative discipline.

Most people who are issued traffic tickets are usually guilty. And while hiring a lawyer to represent you in court might help you lower your fines, it doesn’t always work out the way you want. 

If there are strong shreds of evidence against you, then there really isn’t much your lawyer can do for you. BUT, depending on your driving record, a good lawyer can negotiate with the court and (hopefully) get alternative discipline for you. 

driver hands on wheel

One of the most common alternative discipline options is traffic school/defensive driving school. 

It might not be the ideal resolution for any driver, it’s better than paying hefty fines, increasing auto insurance premiums — or worse — losing your license! 

5.    You want a better chance of success.

This is possibly the most important reason to hire an experienced traffic violation lawyer. Cases handled by a professional have a higher chance of success in court.

thumbs up lawyer

Whether it’s giving you the confidence to contest the ticket, reduce your fines, make the whole case more convenient for you, or any other reasons we’ve mentioned in the article above, working with a traffic ticket lawyer is your best option. 

The Bottom Line

Working with a trained and seasoned traffic lawyer can save you from getting confused by the many technicalities of traffic laws. It can also save you a ton of money in terms of insurance premiums and ticket fines. 

A good traffic lawyer can also help you prove your innocence in any traffic accidents. Furthermore, it can help you get alternative discipline and avoid hefty traffic fines. 

Some things are just not meant to be handled DIY-style. If you have the chance to work with a professional traffic lawyer to help your case go smoothly as possible, take it. They will give you the best possible outcome in a bad situation.

Traffic Lawyer Reviews

We have noticed a growing trend of law firms and attorneys advertising their legal services on Google to help you fight traffic tickets in court.  Below is a list of traffic lawyers that advertise on Google Adwords.  We started this list to get your feedback on their performance and services in our comments section below.  As we receive feedback from users both positive and negative they will be posted on a separate page and link provided.  Please send us any attorneys that we may be missing and we will add them to this list. Thanks in advance for your help!

TicketBust.com
We'll Beat Your Ticket, Guaranteed! Money-Back If We Fail. Seen On NBC

TicketClinic.com
Ticket defense from $199! We Can Help Today 866-CITATION

Trafficticketbust.com
Your Ticket Dismissed, Guaranteed No fines, no points, no joke...

Theticketfixer.com
No Points. No School. No Court.Free Evaluation - Submit Online.

866Speeding.com
5% Case Dismissal Rate Come See Our Victory List! Call Today for a Free Consultation

LATrafficAttorneys.net
Beat Your Traffic Ticket! Attorney Robert Hakim in CA.

2fixyourtrafficticket.com
$189 FLAT FEE Guaranteed 877-814-7542 Fight Your Ticket Now Best Service Guaranteed Get Help

4mrticket.com
Traffic Tickets Dismissed 20 Years Of Fighting Tickets In CA. Call Us Now To Fight Your Ticket.

TrafficTicketPros.com
Got Speeding Ticket? High Dismissal Rate. Free Consultation, Call Now!

GetaReferral.com
Attorney Search Network Certified Attorney Referral Service

Los Angeles Fines May Be Reduced

Los Angeles Times, February 12, 2010

San Fernando Valley Councilman Dennis Zine would lower fines for red-light violations in L.A.

Councilman says drivers' fines will go down and city revenue will go up if the city processes its own tickets. The county and state are likely to fight the plan, which would decrease their revenue.  Tens of thousands of Los Angeles motorists could see reduced fines for red-light violations -- now hovering around $500 with traffic school fees -- under an unusual proposal presented Wednesday at City Hall.

San Fernando Valley Councilman Dennis Zine introduced a motion to study the feasibility of taking the processing of the city's red-light infractions, and possibly other traffic tickets, out of the hands of the county court system. Such a move could reduce the fines, some of which have risen at three times the rate of inflation in recent years, and increase revenue to the city, Zine said.

The tactic has been quietly adopted by a handful of California towns, but none the size of Los Angeles.

The proposal could trigger a fight with the cash-strapped state as well as judicial agencies, both of which could lose millions in revenue from Los Angeles' red-light tickets. Some have questioned the legality of such city-run adjudication programs.

Red-light ticket revenues have grown in recent years as dozens of California cities have turned to automated photo enforcement systems to monitor intersections around the clock. Los Angeles issues about 3,600 red-light violations per month, just with its camera systems; most have been for rolling right turns.

Los Angeles police officials report that the city netted more than $6 million last year from its photo enforcement program.

Zine, a former Los Angeles traffic officer, has been critical of the jump in red-light fines, which are set by state and county agencies.

The fines have become punitive, he argues, particularly for families struggling in the economic downturn. He noted that the city receives only about one-third -- less than $150 -- of the total fine levied for the red-light tickets its officer's issue, while on patrol or via camera systems.

Courts might benefit from his proposal because they are overloaded and reducing days of operation, Zine said in an interview. A Los Angeles County Superior Court spokesperson was not available for comment.

Under the proposal, the city would conduct its own administrative hearings on the tickets. Drivers would still get points for violations reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles, he said. The proposal will be initially considered by the council's Public Safety and Budget committees.

South San Francisco Refunds Cost City $1.4M


At least 3,000 drivers will get money back for red light tickets in South San Francisco, thanks to an error in finalizing the contract with the company that installed the cameras.   Officials in this San Francisco suburb say the city council neglected to ratify the contract with American Traffic Solutions Inc., which installed the cameras last summer. That means the city could not legally operate the automatic cameras.  The contract was finally ratified Jan. 27.

Mayor Mark Addiego says the city contacting motorists caught by the red light cameras between Aug. 15 and Jan. 27 to pay back the $446 fine or the cost of traffic school. Officials say the refund will cost the city at least $1.4 million, in addition to thousands in staff costs needed to help figure out whom to refund.

LA May Add Speed Speed Cameras

Los Angeles might expand the red-light camera program and add speed cameras. The plan would boost revenue, but city officials say it's safety-driven.

Published by LA Times By Rich Connell, February 3, 2010

Los Angeles' red-light traffic camera program, which officials report netted more than $6 million last year after expenses, could be significantly expanded under a new contract to be negotiated over the next 14 months, records and interviews show.  Are Traffic Cameras Legal In Los Angeles, California?

While adding more cameras could offer a welcome boost to city revenue in the midst of a fiscal crisis, officials say any expansion will be based on safety considerations.

No goal has been set, but internal City Hall discussions have included the possibility of adding cameras to blocks of eight intersections at a time and eventually doubling the overall reach of the program to 64 intersections, Los Angeles Police Department officials told The Times.

Fresh details of the discussions emerged as the Police Commission on Tuesday sent the City Council a recommendation to issue bid requests from vendors to operate -- and presumably enlarge -- the program starting next year.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for traffic cameras to be modified to also catch speeders, part of an effort to raise $300 million in fines to help close the state's budget shortfall. 

Los Angeles officials have voiced mixed reactions but taken no formal action on the proposal.

As for red-light cameras, critics contend that the safety benefits have been overstated and that the cameras chiefly are used to fatten government coffers. Those complaints have grown louder as red-light ticket fines have climbed sharply in recent years. They now total more than $500 in Los Angeles County when traffic school fees are included.

But LAPD officials and some experts say photo enforcement reduces potentially serious red-light-running accidents, changes driver behavior for the better and frees up patrol officers for other tasks.

And after struggling with construction delays and start-up and early operating expenses, Los Angeles' red-light cameras have begun producing a sorely needed revenue surplus at a time when city programs and payrolls are being slashed.

Beyond payments of about $2 million to the city's camera vendor and $1.2 million for Police Department costs, the city's 32 camera-equipped intersections generated $6.4 million in net revenue in 2009, said LAPD Sgt. Matthew MacWillie, who oversees the program. The LAPD issues about 3,600 photo enforcement tickets a month, records show.

The program's financial turnaround can be partially attributed to a decision 18 months ago to more than double fines for rolling right-turn violations, which MacWillie has acknowledged account for most violations caught by the cameras.

Previously, Los Angeles had been the only city in the county to charge right turn violations under a vehicle code section that carried a $156 fine. When the LAPD brought its ticketing practices in line with other agencies, right turn fines jumped to $381. The city's share of the fines grew from $58 to nearly $150.

At least one City Council member, Valley representative Dennis Zine, said pursuing bids to continue or expand the photo enforcement program is premature.

He said a detailed study of overall accident rates at photo-equipped intersections was still in the works. "I don't want to do anything until we get the results of that inquiry," he said.

Zine, a former LAPD traffic cop who sits on the council's Public Safety Committee, sought the analysis last year after a local television station reported that the city's red-light cameras haven't always reduced collisions. The LAPD's study is not expected to be completed for about a month.

But MacWillie said Tuesday that data show overall accidents, as well as red-light-running accidents, have declined at camera-equipped intersections.

Considered a key city expert on photo enforcement, MacWillie also said speed cameras can be a valuable traffic enforcement tool if properly focused on safety and altering driver behavior. Approximately 40 people die annually in speed-related accidents in the city, he said.

Zine said putting speed cameras at intersections is an "absurd idea" that would undermine the traditional focus of police officers on public safety.

The governor is "just saying this is a revenue producer," he said.

"With that in mind, why don't we just charge everyone $10 when they start their engine?"

Contesting A Red Light Camera Ticket In Court

The Courts Do Not Care About Your Excuses "la, la, la . . ."

A story from "Tim in LA" about contesting a red light camera violation in an Inglewood, California courtroom.

We were joined by about 20 other people at the 1:30 court time with Commissioner Torrance in Inglewood. The primary officer (I didn't get his name) instructed those of us with red light camera tickets to look at them on the video. He said "You're all here because you didn't stop at a red light, and we'll convict you all for that offense. Commissioner Torrance has been doing this for 4 years and I've been doing it for 2 years..." so he started off being kind of an ---hole. Then said that "we'll show it twice and you each have 1 question to ask." Ok, so my wife and I were the last ones in line and my wife had more than one question. The officers were actually friendly and answered all of her questions. She asked this twice: "if I choose to do the traffic school as a '2nd offender', can I do it online?" Officer Jimenez, the junior officer, said yes, both times. We talked about it quickly because she wanted to avoid having a point on her record; plus, she did traffic school online for another red light camera ticket last year in Culver City and it was no big deal.

So, we all went back into the courtroom and wait for the commissioner to come in. The guy we were sitting next to had the same ticket, as did the guy next to him. The first woman to be called went up and plead no contest and asked the Commissioner this: "Can you please reduce the fine?" And Commissioner Torrance actually said: "Oh, I have no jurisdiction over the fines." What? Then why were we there? I was going to use this huge argument about the 8th amendment and it was like a machine.

It was quickly obvious that they all had no interest in hearing our cases whatsoever. As we waited for our turn, it made me reconsider. Then my wife was called, though I couldn't approach the defense stand with her, which I found odd, even though she was going to have me speak for her. Because she had already agreed to the traffic school, it took less than a minute to process her.

The bailiff then handed her a sheet of paper which said, verbatim:

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!! - The Court has Granted you the opportunity to go to traffic school...

You must now proceed down to the clerk's office located on the 2nd floor of this building, room #202 to pay $64.00. They will provide you with the paperwork and completion date for the traffic school.

Nice, really nice. It's bad enough that we've wasted our day and we paid a fine of $436, but to get this facetious note from the court?? Dripping with attitude no less??! So as we left the court, I got to thinking, "hey, we didn't even have a chance to present anything!?". We got downstairs and were standing in line to pay our fee, everyone down there felt the same way -- we were shoved through the system with no recourse. Then I started reading the back of our pink Superior Court "Request for Trial" slip, and it says:

"1. Contesting Your Ticket: You can contest your ticket by entering a plea of not guilty at your arraignment. Your arraignment will take place in front of a judge or court commissioner, who will advise you of the charges against you and your constitutional and statutory rights." -- We were never advised of those rights.

So, we eventually got to the window downstairs and the woman there said you have to pay $64 for an administrative fee, and the traffic school fee is separate (probably $25 -50.) And as a 2nd offender, you have to spend 12 hours in traffic school in person. What? We were told specifically that we could do it online. She said no, and after arguing with her for a couple minutes, we finally decided to forget it - my wife wasn't going to do 12 hours of traffic school. We have 3-year-old twins at home and she wasn't going to lose that much time. She'll take the point on her record. The $64 was for traffic school alone! So, she has a point on her record, but at least we saved potentially $114. We marched back upstairs and saw the officers waiting for an elevator and told Officer Jimenez that what he told us was wrong. He apologized. And the amazing thing was that the technician who was in the room when we were asking the questions probably knew the right answer about traffic school and didn't say anything.

Seriously, we're both extremely disappointed. I don't even know who to contact for the biggest impact. Someone needs to say something and do it in a very public way. I got lots of tickets over 18 years in Portland, and never have I experienced something like this -- why doesn't the Commissioner have any authority to change the fines? That is precisely why we were all there. Something needs to be done about the excessive fines. And to think if we'd been going 13 mph, no ticket...

Wow, if I'd known it was going to be like that, we would have certainly asked for an extension. That was so ridiculous, I'm more flabbergasted than mad. But, I'm pretty mad. Anyway, thought you might find some of this interesting and useful. Let me know who to contact.

Always contact your trusted criminal defense attorney when faced with San Diego Domestic Violence Charges.