Updated Red Light and Speed Camera Fine Information by State

As a driver, understanding the laws and fines associated with red light cameras and speed cameras is crucial for maintaining good driving habits and avoiding unexpected expenses. This article provides an updated overview of the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations across the United States. Please note that these fines can vary by municipality, so it’s essential to check local regulations for the most accurate information.

Red Light Camera Fines and Points

The table below summarizes the current fines and points for red light camera violations in each state:

State	Red Light Camera Fine ($)	Red Light Camera Points
Alabama	$100	No Points
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	No Programs	-
California	$490	1 Point
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	$75-$230	-
District of Columbia	$150	0 to 2 Points
Florida	$200	-
Georgia	$70	No Points
Hawaii	$77	-
Illinois	$100-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	$100-$140	No Points
Maryland	$100	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	$100	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	$85	No Points
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$50-$100	No Points
North Carolina	$50-$100	3 Points
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$260-$1,000	-
Pennsylvania	$100	No Points
Rhode Island	$75	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	State Ban	-
Virginia	$100-$200	0 to 4 Points
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Speed Camera Fines and Points

In addition to red light cameras, many states also have speed camera programs. Below is a summary of speed camera fines and points across the states:

State	Speed Camera Fine ($)	Speed Camera Points
Alabama	-	-
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	-	-
California	-	-
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	-	-
District of Columbia	$50-$300	0, 3, 4, 5 Points
Florida	-	-
Georgia	-	-
Hawaii	-	-
Illinois	$250-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	-	-
Maryland	$40-$1,000	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	-	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	-	-
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$90-$1,200	No Points (Possible Jail Time)
North Carolina	-	-
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$110-$2,000	-
Pennsylvania	-	-
Rhode Island	-	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	-	-
Virginia	-	-
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Important Notes

• Local Variations: Keep in mind that this information can vary widely by municipality within each state. It’s essential to verify specific details with local laws or law enforcement agencies.

• Changes in Regulations: Traffic laws and fines can change frequently. Drivers should regularly check for updates in their state or locality to stay informed.

• Safe Driving Practices: To avoid the potential of incurring fines or points on your license, always adhere to traffic signals and speed limits, and practice safe driving habits.

By understanding the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations in your state, you can better navigate the roads and make informed decisions as a driver. Always stay updated on your local traffic laws to ensure a safe and compliant driving experience.

The Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations: Your Comprehensive Resource for Traffic Camera Data

In the era of digital information, having access to comprehensive and organized data is essential for informed decision-making. When it comes to traffic enforcement, understanding the locations of red-light cameras, speed cameras, and other photo enforcement devices can significantly enhance road safety and awareness. Enter the concept of the “Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations” — a collaborative, user-driven platform designed to provide detailed, accurate, and up-to-date information about photo enforcement locations across various regions. This article explores the importance of such a resource, its benefits, and how it can empower both drivers and communities.

What is the Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations?

The Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations is an online database that compiles and organizes information about photo enforcement sites, including:

• Red-Light Cameras: Devices that capture images of vehicles running red lights.
• Speed Cameras: Cameras that monitor and record the speed of passing vehicles.
• Traffic Surveillance Cameras: Cameras that monitor traffic flow and assist in identifying violations.

By crowd-sourcing information from users and integrating official data, this resource aims to be the go-to hub for anyone looking to understand traffic enforcement practices in their area.

The Importance of a Centralized Database

1. Enhanced Safety Awareness

   Access to accurate information about photo enforcement locations can lead to safer driving behaviors. When drivers know where cameras are located, they are more likely to adhere to speed limits and traffic signals, ultimately reducing accidents and injuries.

2. Transparency in Enforcement

   A centralized database fosters transparency regarding traffic enforcement practices. Citizens can better understand how and where enforcement measures are applied, which can help mitigate concerns about unfair or excessive ticketing.

3. Community Engagement

   By allowing users to contribute information, the Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations encourages community involvement. Local residents can report changes, such as new camera installations or updates, which helps keep the database current and reliable.

4. Educational Resource

   The platform serves as an educational tool for drivers, enabling them to learn about traffic laws, the purpose of photo enforcement, and the implications of violations. This knowledge empowers individuals to make informed decisions while on the road.

Benefits of Using the Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations

• User-Friendly Interface: Designed with ease of navigation in mind, users can quickly find information specific to their area or plan routes avoiding photo enforcement locations.

• Up-to-Date Information: The platform is continuously updated with contributions from users and official sources, ensuring that the data remains current and relevant.

• Interactive Features: Users can engage with the database through comments, ratings, and contributions, fostering a sense of community and collaboration.

• Cross-Referencing: The database can link to related resources, such as local traffic laws, safety tips, and news articles regarding traffic enforcement initiatives.

How to Contribute and Access Information

Contributing to the Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations is simple:

1. Sign Up: Users can create an account to contribute data and engage with the community.
2. Report Locations: Users can submit information about new camera installations or changes to existing ones, including details like camera type and location.
3. Share Experiences: Users can share personal experiences or insights about traffic enforcement in their areas, helping others stay informed.

Accessing the database is equally straightforward. Users can search by location, camera type, or even specific intersections to find relevant information.

Conclusion

The Wikipedia of Photo Enforced Locations stands as a vital resource in the landscape of traffic safety and enforcement. By providing a centralized, user-driven database, it not only enhances awareness of traffic enforcement measures but also fosters community engagement and accountability. As drivers become more informed, we can collectively work towards safer roads and more responsible driving behaviors.

For up-to-date information on photo enforced locations in your area, visit photoenforced.com and become part of a growing community dedicated to road safety and transparency.

Here / NAVTEQ Reluctant to Use Crowdsourced Data Still?

NAVTEQ/HERE Technologies has historically focused on utilizing various data sources, including sensor data, official sources, and partnerships with car manufacturers and other entities, to create and maintain their digital maps and location services.

Crowdsourcing, which involves gathering data from the public or users, is a commonly used approach in many mapping and navigation services. However, specific companies may have their own strategies and preferences when it comes to data acquisition.

It's possible that NAVTEQ/HERE Technologies has chosen to rely less on crowdsourcing and prioritize other data sources and partnerships to ensure the accuracy and reliability of their mapping products. However, I cannot provide information on their current beliefs or strategies since my knowledge is based on information available until September 2021. For the most up-to-date and accurate information, it would be best to refer to official statements or communications from NAVTEQ/HERE Technologies themselves.

NYC School Zone Speed Cameras Network is Largest in the World

NYC's speed camera system now the largest in the world; 2,000 speed cams expected by end of 2021. 

The city is issuing violations of the school speed zone cameras from 6 a.m. Monday through Friday, until 10 p.m., all year round. Speed cameras will be run by the city in 750 school speed zones.

Which states allow speed cameras?

Mayor Bill de Blasio declared that the Department of Transportation had accomplished its objective of installing speed cameras in 750 school areas throughout the city, establishing the largest speed camera network in the world.

The mayor also declared that the speed limit would be lowered by five miles per hour on nine streets in the city, including one on Staten Island, in an attempt to further curb speeding on city streets.

At present, within the 750 designated school zones, 950 speed-cameras are mounted throughout the city. 

While the number of school zones with cameras is legally limited at 750, multiple cameras are allowed in areas, with the city preparing by the end of 2021 to have 2,000 total cameras operating inside the 750 areas.  

Here is our map of NYC speed cameras map below that is continually updated as new locations come online.  We crowdsourced these locations through a network of users in the city.  

The number of school zones allowed to operate speed cameras grew from 140 to 750 in July 2019, with cameras being allowed to operate on weekdays during the year, from 6 a.m. By 10 p.m., with school and summer holidays included.

In the current legislation, the wording now requires cameras to be placed within a quarter-mile radial radius of a school, as opposed to the previous law requiring the cameras to be placed along an abutted street within a quarter-mile of the school.

At a speed camera station, motorists who are photographed violating the speed limit by more than 10 mph earn a $50 fine.  

The installation of speed cameras has been shown to reduce speed in the region by over 60 percent, according to the DOT.

NYC officials said that when the coronavirus pandemic reached New York in March, they saw a spike in speeding violations. They said that lockdown restrictions to monitor the spread of pathogens possibly led drivers to take advantage of emptier highways. Now that most of the city has reopened and traffic has resumed, officials worry that drivers are still ignoring the speed limits that have been posted.

The city is seeking to eradicate all traffic accidents on its streets by 2024 under Vision Zero, an initiative initiated by Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014. Although fewer pedestrians and cyclists have been killed in traffic collisions this year relative to the same time in 2019, fatalities have increased involving motor-vehicle drivers and passengers, said Nilda Hofmann, the transport chief of the New York Police Department.

The driver of a car driving beyond the speed limit in a school zone is charged with this type of violation.

• The owner of the subject vehicle is responsible for the ticket if:
• The car was being driven by the owner’s express or implied permission.
• The car was observed by the camera traveling in a school speed zone in excess of 10 MPH of the posted maximum speed limit.
• The violation took place Monday through Friday between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

Other information about school zone speeding camera violations:

• The camera must successfully pass a self-test of its functions on the date of occurrence.
• The camera must undergo an annual calibration check and a certification of that fact must be kept.
• Each camera operator must provide a certification that the camera was operating properly on the date of occurrence, which you are entitled to see upon request.

Potential Defenses 

• Your documentation indicates that the ticket was given outside of the days or hours needed for compliance. 
• Your proof shows you are not the owner of the ticketed car. For instance, at the time of the incident, there were other cars near you, and the camera caught the wrong vehicle. 
• Your data suggests that on the date of incidence, the camera failed. 
• You have proof that your vehicle was stolen and not found prior to the incident.

Apple Maps Speed & Red Light Camera Reviews

Google Maps and Google-owned Waze, the popular driving navigation app, both already include these features. Waze has let drivers report and flag known camera spots and speed traps for years. It backed away in recent years from displaying police checkpoints, like those set up to snag drunk drivers. 

 We are curious where Apple Maps is publishing speed cameras and if these locations are accurate?

Apple is adding multiple new features to the Maps app in iOS 14, including Apple Maps icons that will let users know when they're approaching speed cameras and red-light cameras along a route.

It's not clear if this feature will be limited to select areas, countries, or will have a wide rollout, and it does not appear to be implemented in the initial ‌iOS 14‌ beta as an examination of the Maps app with various routes did not display icons for traffic cameras. 

   

While MacRumors took a look at the iOS 14 Maps app this week and couldn't find any traffic camera icons, it looks like there may be more to the CarPlay feature, as one Reddit user discovered. Google is testing a new feature in Maps that lets users report accidents and speed cameras. The feature, introduced in the latest version of Apple's map operating system, Apple Maps, displays a small speed camera icon at a point on the map where users report seeing a police speed trap.  

    

So far Apple hasn't really said much about how it will work, but I've listed a few examples of maps that should let you know when you get close. Google Maps shows you the location of the speed camera on your planned route and plays an audio cue on the map that tells you when you need to approach it. Apple Maps does not detect speed, it will try to give you data about speed limits, but will not inform you about changes. This information would be useful in both Apple Maps and CarPlay, so I'm curious to see if it works when I approach it. 

    

If you are in an area where the speed limit has fallen, Google Maps will notify you if there is a speed trap in front of you. The app logs your speed as you approach the limit and also shows you its location, and warns you if you do, so you should slow down and watch your surroundings.

       

The company has been working diligently on a massive maps update, and now comes Apple's biggest update in history, taking Apple Maps and other app features to a whole new level. If you're wondering why Apple Maps isn't getting out - looking at improvements in iOS 12, here's the answer: The company's long-term plans for the Maps app on iOS are much longer than that. The maps have been updated and have more features than ever before, including the ability to update maps, as well as a number of new features, such as speed cameras. Apple Map is currently available on the App Store for iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and iPad Air 2, but will also be available on Android phones and tablets. 

Please give us your feedback below on the data Apple Maps is publishing. Are they missing locations and are they accurately reporting in markets worldwide?

    

Red Light & Speed Cameras POI Database

PhotoEnforced.com's crowdsourced database is the largest and most complete US database as we raise awareness of our open platform to share information about red light cameras, right turn cameras, speed cameras, or anything that is enforced using camera automation.   

A Point of Interest (POI) database for red light and speed cameras typically provides information about the locations of these cameras. These databases can be used in GPS navigation systems or mobile apps to provide alerts to drivers when they are approaching a red light or speed camera.

There are several companies and organizations that offer POI databases for red light and speed cameras, including commercial providers and community-driven platforms. Some well-known providers include Garmin, TomTom, iGO, and various mobile apps like Waze or Google Maps.

The accuracy of these databases can vary depending on factors such as the frequency of updates, data sources, and user contributions. It's important to note that these databases may not always be 100% accurate or up to date due to changes in traffic regulations, new camera installations, or removals.

If you're interested in accessing a red light and speed camera POI database, you can explore options from the providers mentioned above. Additionally, community-driven platforms may offer user-contributed data, which can help increase the accuracy and coverage of the database.

Remember, while these databases can provide helpful information, it's always essential to drive responsibly, obey traffic laws, and stay alert to your surroundings when approaching intersections or driving in areas with red lights and speed cameras.

Waze Camera Location Data is Not Accurate

How does Waze verify red light camera locations?

Here is a screenshot of Waze published red light cameras in New York.  This is not consistent with our data that is verified using news reports and Google Street view.  

  

We frequently get emails from our users who think Waze's red-light camera information is not accurate. This doesn't surprise me as I have seen this several times myself in the Los Angeles area.  

How do they verify data?  Curating data using the crowd only works if you have experts in each market who know what they are looking for.  

I have seen several "false positives" as well on the freeway.  Users seem to input that traffic is jammed or there is a parked car on the side of the road which is not correct.  

I would like to see Waze partner with companies like ours to verify data that is relatively static-like red light cameras.  

I would also like Waze to warn drivers of potentially hazardous intersections and warn people about the intersection that are dangerous.  They have an alert feature to do this and would like to see more warnings.  

Follow Us on Google+

Google+ Has Been Removed

PhotoEnforced.com has just started using Google+ in an attempt to engage further with readers and red light camera database contributors.  Please feel free to post links and articles that might be helpful to our database or for changing laws.  You can find PhotoEnforced.com Google+ here and don't forget to add us to your circles.  I also encourage you to follow Jeff Cohn Google+ as well.  PhotoEnforced.com Twitter and PhotoEnforced.com Facebook should also be followed if you use them for actively as well.

I am pretty impressed with what I’ve seen so far in the launch. Its faster and less cluttered than Facebook. One of the key points for me though is that it is very intuitive and more flexible for filtering views. I think Google+ will eventually become the platform for business networking and Facebook will become the standard for friends and family networking. 

Google+ is not a Facebook killer but simply a supplement. If you are a heavy Google users for search, email and advertising like we are then enjoy it for the future.

Crowdsourcing Traffic Companies

The telematics, mapping, and mobile applications industry is growing and so are crowdsourced traffic companies.  The race to build or acquire the biggest crowd data has taken hold with the first acquisition of Trapster by Nokia / Navteq. Navteq reportedly outbid by five other potential acquirers. Trapster attracted a large app following putting it ahead of TCS / (Networks in Motion) with about five million probes, but behind Telenav, with more than 17 million. Who else is in the game? Onstar, RIM, Google, TomTom, Inrix, Waze, Telmap who track the mobile phone and device location speeds.  Read more in the article The Race to Scale Crowd-Sourced Traffic Data is On.

How do map companies get traffic data?  These hardware and software companies have access to the GPS feeds associated with your mobile device or phone and use it to map traffic on maps.  They also accept reported incidents from users and have tools to filter the information before publishing.  Trapster had many locations reported by users but it was never very clear how the filtering process worked and how many false positives they had by spammers using the app.  These are some of the filtering challenges companies like this face as the source data on the handset.

NAVTEQ a Media Company?

NAVTEQ wants to become a media company but has no intention of selling directly to consumers. I scratch my head hearing the contradiction? I was at the Navteq Connections Conference today and heard some contradictions in strategy and customer focus. As long as they continue to have a developer-centric approach they will continue to fall behind.  Developers need a platform that has wide adoption like Android.  I am not sure that just a platform encourages developers to use it without some unique content.

Google Maps realizes its unique content and Navteq is far from a media company.  Media companies are all about unique content creation similar to what it had Traffic.com.   However, it seems to want to morph this organization into an ad network. What's missing to become a media company? Content and eyeball creation.  Navteq needs to take a more aggressive stance in the online publishing world if they truly want to become a media company.  They should be buying companies like PhotoEnforced.com and GasBuddy.com and provide proprietary content for their customers. Navteq seems content trying to court the large automotive car companies like Ford who are 5 years behind in the content business from smartphones.

Cities Removing Red Light Camera Locations

Here is a continually updated list of cities that have removed or partially removed red light camera locations recently.  Subscribe to our red light camera locations database to get a full list of detailed locations.  Keep in mind some States and County jurisdictions have passed laws preventing the use of red-light cameras but Cities and Municipalities continue to use them illegally.  To remove a location please provide a link to a local newspaper article highlighting the City Council's decision to remove the cameras.  We are only concerned with locations that have been permanently removed and not those that have been deactivated temporarily.

Anchorage, AK
Arlington, TX
Avondale, CA
Burlingame, CA
Brooksville, FL
College Station, TX
Costa Mesa, CA
Lilburn, GA
Loma Linda, CA
Lubbock, TX
Melbourne, FL
Monterey Park, CA
Moreno Valley, CA
Naperville, FL
Norcross, GA
Peoria, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Redlands, CA
San Carlos, CA
Scottsdale, AZ
Springfield, MO
Snellville, GA
Suwanee, GA
St. Peters, FL
Union City, CA
Wilmington, NC
Yucaipa, CA

As always, please email us if we are missing any cities on this list or still have locations listed in our public database that should be removed.

Related Articles:
How Many US Cities Use Red Light Cameras
Arizona Freeway Speed Cameras Go Bye Bye
Moreno Valley Dumps Red Light Cameras
Avondale Arizona Shuts Down Red Light Cameras

PhantomALERT Nears $1M Revenue with Speed and Red Light Cam Database

Bogus GPS Business News Report

PhantomALERT Nears $1M Revenue with Speed and Red Light Cam Database

This is a complete lie and if it's true the company will soon crumble for having crap data. Too many companies are copying our data and selling it for free. If you notice in the article it says the company was started in 2008 and does not disclose how they acquired their database. PhotoEnforced.com was the first company to even think about sourcing this information and started the database four years before anyone else back in 2001. I wish licensees would do their homework as ask tough and credible questions. How did you source your data and can your history be verified?

Why Our Competitors Claim Crowdsourcing Sucks

I have to laugh every time I see one of our competitors claim: "Our red light camera database is the best because OUR locations are verified."  It's a big fat lie and a half-truth.  Here is a recent quote by a "no-name" company in their press release:   "Unlike other safety cameras that use inferior databases which often depend heavily on unqualified and frequently incorrect user input, or old, expired data, the database contains data points that are continually verified through research and a network of professionals. The new camera locations are not just added to, earlier data points but are verified for continued relevance and are removed if they are found to be no longer in force. Our database was named the most accurate safety cam database in a recent category test."

10 things you should substantiate before licensing data from a competitive red light camera database:

1) Verification of 3,000-7,000 locations with all 500+ cities, municipalities, and counties is a LIE.

2) No sources or history for their data being added, removed, and/or methodology for gathering data (thieves)

3) No info on the number of locations in the database (fear of being incomplete)

4) No volunteers on the ground in the hundreds of municipalities (no goodwill)

5) No press coverage and blogger or user credibility (because they copy)

6) Refusal to have a "bake-off" competition to substantiate their data (fear of being wrong)

7) We were the U.S. pioneers in 2001 which is 3 times longer than any competitor (late to the game)

8) PhotoEnforced.com has had well over one million people visit our site (brand recognition)

9) Google Street maps pictures are old and cannot verify new cameras (nice try)

10) Business models borrowed from Europe which has 40K (5x) locations (Google Ads changing the game)

We have by far the most complete database of 7000+ locations contrary to what the companies with deep pockets and PR will try to promote. What our competitors don't know is that we have a public database and a private database for our customers. Our public database is 95% accurate but there are some phantom locations purposely inserted to keep thieves from copying the entire database which has been done many times. Just to be clear we encourage individual users to download and use the data in their local markets and give us accurate feedback for free.

Over time we eventually ferret out false locations because of our enormous consumer reach of nearly 1,000 ticketed drivers per each day visit our website. We think more than half of people who think they receive tickets look online at our site for sources to verify the locations and come to our site first from a Google search engine query.  Also, we have had numerous former employees from each company tell us that they in fact they use Photoenforced.com as their primary source of data.

If any competitors would like to post a rebuttal to my accusations please do so below.

Cobra Electronics Licensing Data to Navteq?

We are also pleased to announce that we have executed an agreement with a major manufacturer of mobile phones and mobile navigation products to include the AURA (TM) database in their North American and European navigation products that will be released early next year." said Jim Bazet, Cobra's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

"This is a significant step in our plan to make AURA the preeminent provider of photo-enforcement alerts globally and is expected to contribute to revenues and earnings in the second half of 2010. Moreover, PPL generated an increase in sales due to the strength of its new product introductions - mobile navigation products tailored to the needs of the professional driver and the recreational vehicle owner. Cobra has recently launched in the U.S. a mobile navigation product for the professional driver that utilizes this successful PPL platform. We are aggressively pursuing new opportunities and expect a substantial improvement in fourth-quarter results."

Cobra Electronics (Ticker: COBR) Reports Third Quarter Results | Reuters: 

How much due diligence did the "licensee" (Navteq owned by Nokia Ticker: NOK) do on where Cobra acquired the AURA database information and how they plan to keep the information fresh?

See related articles:

10 Questions about NAVTEQ's Speed and Red Light Camera Database
Red Light & Speed Cameras POI Database

Does NAVTEQ Steal POI Data?

We would like to alleviate some of the confusion in the marketplace. Navteq is NOT currently a customer of PhotoEnforced.com and we have no idea where they have acquired their data from.

However, PhotoEnforced.com has been the #1 sole source and pioneer of gathering red light camera and speed camera locations in a free open database since 2001. There are many databases in the market described above that copy our data and use this data and sell it. If you are considering licensing or using the NAVTEQ speed and red light camera locations database you might want to ask them the following questions first . . .

1) Why are you missing about 1000+ locations?
2) What sources for acquiring the original 5000 locations?
3) Are your sources for the data-stealing content?
4) Sources for updates on new locations and changes?
5) Proprietary research (?) when PhotoEnforced.com is free?
6) Any right turn and red light camera/speed combo cameras?
7) Why did it take you so many years to release a product?
8) Can you deliver updates to the locations in real-time?
9) How do you charge for the database?
10) Publishing fines with the location be a copyright violation?

NAVTEQ, the leading global provider of digital map, traffic, and location data for in-vehicle, portable, wireless, and enterprise solutions, announced today at Telematics Detroit 2009 speed and red light camera locations are now available for the NAVTEQ(R) map of North America. NAVTEQ Camera Alert(TM) includes up-to-date information about the exact location of speed limit cameras, red-light cameras, as well as combined speed and red light cameras in 5,000 locations throughout North America and Australia.

"Automated cameras are proliferating across North American cities," stated Cindy Paulauskas, vice president of America's map and content products, NAVTEQ. "And our proprietary research indicates that these types of warnings are a highly valued feature in countries where this navigation system functionality is available. Providing our customers with quality North America camera location information helps enable solutions that give drivers better knowledge of maximum speeds and traffic signals - with alerts at the right place and at the right time."

See related posts:
Cobra Electronics Licensing Data to Navteq?
Red Light & Speed Cameras POI Database

Stop Sign Photo Enforced Camera Locations

Automated Stop Sign Photographic Systems will have cameras mounted at certain intersections that will record all vehicles that pass through. Unlike red light cameras, where a flash goes off when a car runs a red light, no flash will occur when a violation is committed at the stop signs. Instead, the tape will roll and at a later time be viewed by a police officer who will look for individuals going through without stopping. The fine is currently $100-200 and our database is now set up to accept these locations.