Where Are Solar Speed Radar Signs Located? A Complete Guide

Just a reminder that we are tracking these solar speed radar sign locations. 

Which states allow speed cameras?

Where Are Solar Speed Radar Signs Located?
Solar-powered speed radar signs — sometimes called “speed radar signs” — are becoming more common on U.S. roadways. These devices don’t issue tickets; instead, they detect a vehicle’s speed and flash a warning when a driver is exceeding the limit. They act as a visual reminder to slow down, rather than as an enforcement tool. At PhotoEnforced, we’re actively tracking the locations of these radar signs across the country and maintaining a public map. As of May 2020, we’ve cataloged 53 known speed radar signs and continue to add new ones based on submissions from our users and field observations.

What Are Solar Speed Radar Signs?

Unlike conventional speed cameras that generate tickets, solar radar signs are passive warning systems. Their main features:

• Solar-powered: They run off solar panels, so they’re self-sustaining and don’t require external wiring or grid power.

• Non-ticketing: They detect when you exceed the posted speed limit and flash a warning, but they don’t issue citations or capture your license plate for enforcement.

• Awareness tool: Their goal is to encourage safer driving behavior in sensitive or hazard-prone zones, such as near schools, parks, or residential streets.
  Because they’re low-cost, easy to deploy, and non-intrusive in terms of power infrastructure, they are increasingly popular in areas where cities want to improve safety without installing full-fledged automated enforcement systems.

Why Track Their Locations?

Knowing where these radar signs are placed is useful for several reasons:

1. Road safety awareness: Drivers who are aware of radar sign locations may slow down in those areas. That in turn helps reduce speed-related crashes or near-misses, especially in zones with higher pedestrian traffic.

2. Community transparency: Since these signs are not enforcement devices (they don’t issue tickets), mapping them helps differentiate them from speed cameras. This clarity helps citizens understand what’s warning versus what’s enforcing.

3. Data and planning: Municipalities, planners, and researchers can use the location data to analyze patterns: which roads tend to get these signs, how effective they are, and where future deployments might make sense.

4. Public engagement: Because some of the deployments come from community or grassroots efforts, having a shared map allows civic-minded drivers to report signs, verify them, or question whether more are needed in their area.

Where You’ll Find Them

From our database and reports, radar signs tend to cluster in certain kinds of zones:

• School zones & around schools: Areas where children cross streets or walk frequently are high-priority locations for visual speed reminders.

• Parks, playgrounds, and recreation areas: When there’s pedestrian activity or relaxed street design, these zones often see radar signs.

• Residential neighborhoods: In streets with local traffic but speed issues, particularly those adjacent to schools or parks, radar signs are often used to calm traffic.

• Transition zones or gateways: At places where speed limits change—such as when entering a lower-speed residential or school zone—the radar signs act as a reminder as drivers transition from faster roads.

• Spots with crash history or safety concerns: Roads with a history of speeding crashes or near-misses may get radar signs as part of a “fix-it-first” safety approach.
  Because the devices are solar powered and relatively simple, they’re well-suited for roads where traditional enforcement systems would be expensive or impractical.

How to Add a Radar Sign to the Map

If you spot a solar radar sign and it’s not yet on the PhotoEnforced map, you can submit a location. Typically, you’ll need:

• A photo of the sign (to confirm it’s indeed a radar sign and not an enforcement camera).

• The address, intersection, or GPS coordinates.

• Any additional notes (e.g. speed limit posted, direction of travel, nearby school or park).
  These crowd-sourced submissions help expand the map’s coverage and accuracy. Over time, as more people contribute, the database becomes more robust and useful for all.

Current Count & Map

As of May 2020, we’ve logged 53 solar radar signs. The map is publicly available and updated as new signs are verified and added. We encourage readers to contribute signs they’ve encountered. To explore current entries or add a sign yourself, you can use the PhotoEnforced “Add Speed Radar” submission tool and browse the interactive map. The map includes icons for each sign, letting users see where they are scattered across different states and regions. The map is not static — it’s updated regularly as contributors submit new locations or validate existing ones.

Why They Are Increasing in Use

Several advantages make solar radar signs appealing for communities and transportation departments:

• Lower cost and easier deployment: Because there’s no wiring or grid connection, solar radar signs can be installed more cheaply and flexibly than full enforcement cameras.

• Reduced controversy: Since they don’t issue tickets, these signs are less contentious from a policy or legal standpoint. They are more readily accepted by communities wary of automated enforcement.

• Behavioral impact with less intrusion: Studies and anecdotal evidence suggest that visual feedback—“you’re driving too fast” flashing signs—can lead to voluntary speed reduction, especially in familiar areas.

• Scalable & modular: You can place them in many locations (e.g. school zones, side streets) without committing to more complex camera systems.

• Public relations & safety image: For local governments, installing radar signs is often seen as a safety-friendly move, signaling to constituents that authorities care about local road speed and pedestrian safety.

Limitations & Considerations

Despite their benefits, there are a few caveats:

• Effect may wear off: Over time, drivers may habituate to the signs and stop reacting to the flashing when exceeding the speed limit.

• No enforcement power: Because they don’t capture license plates or issue fines, their effect relies entirely on voluntary compliance.

• Placement matters: If a sign is off to the side, hidden by foliage, or not well aligned with the roadway, drivers may not see it in time for the visual cue to be meaningful.

• Not a substitute for enforcement in high-risk areas: In zones with chronic speeding or dangerous crash histories, stronger enforcement tools may still be needed in conjunction with radar signs.

• Maintenance & calibration: Even though they are simpler than cameras, radar signs need upkeep — solar panels need cleaning, the equipment must be calibrated, and the electronics must be protected from tampering or vandalism.

What You Can Do as a Driver or Citizen

• Learn where they’re located: Use the interactive map to see whether any radar signs are near your home, school, or commute path.

• Help expand the map: If you see a new sign, submit it — a photo, location, and some details go a long way.

• Drive more mindfully: The presence of a flashing radar sign is an indicator: you’re in a zone where speed is a concern, so slow down and be alert to pedestrians, intersections, or children.

• Advocate locally: If your community lacks radar signs in high-risk corridors, you can suggest them to your transportation or public works departments as low-cost safety tools.

We call these locations "speed radar signs" in our database.  The new speed radar signs are typically solar-powered like this image below.  They don't issue tickets but flash when you are going over the speed limit to warn you to slow down.  

These new cameras are popping up all over the place and you can easily add them to our database here.  The locations are important to track in the database because they are typically dangerous locations around schools, parks, and schools.  

Submit a new solar speed radar sign here. 

Red Light Camera Warning Signs

Red light cameras are increasingly common at busy intersections, and their purpose is to deter dangerous driving and reduce collisions. But many drivers ask the same question: why are there warning signs at some intersections and not at others?

The answer depends on local and state laws. In California, for example, there’s a specific statute—VC § 21455.5(a)(1)—that governs where red light camera warning signs must be posted. In other states, the rules are much less clear. This article breaks down the purpose of warning signs, the legal requirements behind them, and how you can use them to defend against a ticket.

Why Are There Red Light Camera Warning Signs?

The goal of red light camera warning signs is to provide fair notice to drivers. These signs are meant to ensure that drivers know enforcement is in place so they can make safer decisions approaching intersections.

The law recognizes that posting a sign is one of the most obvious ways to alert drivers. While the most visible option would be to place a sign directly on the traffic signal itself, statutes often allow flexibility, and cities take advantage of that.

What the California Law Says

According to VC § 21455.5(a)(1):

“Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes.”

This means California cities have two options:

1. Post warning signs at the intersections where cameras are installed, visible to all approaching traffic.

2. Place signs at all main entrances to the city, including freeways, bridges, and highways.

The law requires signs, but it doesn’t always require them to be at the exact location of the intersection.

How Close Do Signs Have to Be?

One of the gray areas in the law is distance from the intersection. California statutes are vague on how close a warning sign must be. The decision is often left up to cities.

• Signs might be posted directly at the intersection—mounted on a traffic signal pole.

• They might also be placed further back, at the entrance to a city or highway off-ramp.

According to Caltrans design standards, signs must be at least 30 inches wide, 40 inches high, and 6 feet off the ground. But there’s no firm requirement on distance from the enforced intersection.

This means drivers may not see a warning sign until well before or after they’ve passed through an area.

Why Placement Matters

If warning signs are hidden, damaged, too small, or posted far away, it can affect the legitimacy of the enforcement program. Courts in some cases have dismissed tickets when drivers proved they didn’t receive the required notice.

For example, if you receive a red light photo ticket, you should check whether:

• Signs were posted at the intersection.

• Signs were posted at city entrances or highway ramps.

• Signs were the correct size and height.

• Signs were visible, not blocked by trees, construction, or other signs.

If you can show that warning signs weren’t posted in accordance with VC § 21455.5(a)(1), you may be able to contest the ticket.

The Purpose Behind Warning Sign Laws

Cities and states include warning sign requirements for several reasons:

1. Transparency: Drivers deserve to know when they’re under camera enforcement.

2. Deterrence: If drivers see a warning sign, they are more likely to stop on yellow rather than risk running a red.

3. Public Perception: Signs help reduce criticism that cameras are “money traps” rather than safety tools.

Why Some Intersections Don’t Have Signs

Even when laws require them, cities often have discretion in how they post signs. Some common practices include:

• Placing only citywide entrance signs instead of at every intersection.

• Installing signs at freeway exits leading into camera-enforced areas.

• Using “Photo Enforced” plaques mounted under traffic lights at only select intersections.

This explains why some intersections appear to lack warning signs, even though enforcement is active.

Contesting a Ticket Using Signage Issues

If you’ve been cited at a red light camera intersection, one defense strategy is to challenge whether proper warning signs were posted.

Steps to take:

1. Return to the Location – Revisit the intersection where the violation occurred.

2. Document with Photos – Capture images of missing, blocked, or damaged signs.

3. Compare with Standards – Check whether the signs meet Caltrans or state size/height requirements.

4. Present in Court – Argue that the lack of proper signage means you weren’t given fair notice.

Warning Signs in Other States

Not every state requires red light camera signs. For example:

• New York City: Publishes camera locations online but doesn’t require signs at every intersection.

• Florida: Some cities place signs at city entrances instead of each intersection.

• Illinois: Requires clear signage at camera locations.

• Texas: Before banning cameras statewide, intersections had to be signed.

Because laws vary, it’s important for drivers to check their own state’s vehicle code.

Safety vs. Revenue Debate

Supporters of warning signs argue they encourage compliance and reduce crashes. Critics argue that cities sometimes minimize signage to maximize revenue. This debate continues in many states where drivers complain that warning signs are hard to see or inconsistently placed.

The underlying question: are cameras really about safety or money? Warning signs are one of the clearest ways cities can show they are prioritizing safety.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are red light camera warning signs required everywhere?
A: No. Some states mandate them, while others only require public notice or online lists.

Q: How big are the signs supposed to be?
A: In California, Caltrans requires them to be at least 30 inches wide, 40 inches tall, and 6 feet off the ground.

Q: Can I fight a ticket if there was no sign?
A: Yes—if state law requires signs and they were missing, hidden, or not compliant, you may have grounds to dispute.

Q: Why do some intersections have signs and others don’t?
A: Cities often use flexibility in the law, posting signs at city entrances or highway off-ramps instead of at every intersection.

Q: Do warning signs guarantee I won’t get a ticket?
A: No. They are meant as notice, not protection. If you run a red light, the camera will still record the violation.

Conclusion

Red light camera warning signs play a vital role in traffic enforcement. They provide legal notice, improve transparency, and give drivers a fair chance to adjust their behavior. But laws vary widely by state, and even within states, cities have flexibility in where and how signs are posted.

If you’ve been ticketed, checking whether proper signs were in place can be an important part of your defense. Missing, hidden, or non-compliant signage can sometimes invalidate a citation.

For drivers, the key lesson is this: always watch for warning signs when entering a city or approaching a busy intersection—but don’t assume that the absence of a sign means there are no cameras.

Related articles: 

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

Drive Like Your Kids Live Here! A Campaign for Safer Streets

One of my favorite quotes, "Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!"

 

As communities across the country focus on promoting safety, the “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign has emerged as a powerful message aimed at encouraging responsible driving. This initiative serves as a reminder to all motorists that the streets they travel are home to families, children, and pedestrians who deserve protection from reckless driving. Here’s an in-depth look at this important campaign and how it can help create safer neighborhoods for everyone.

The Importance of Safe Driving

Every day, thousands of children navigate their neighborhoods, walking to school, playing outside, and riding bikes. However, as traffic congestion and vehicle speeds increase, the risk of accidents rises dramatically. Safe driving is crucial for several reasons:

1. Protecting Vulnerable Pedestrians: Children are particularly vulnerable due to their size and unpredictability. Drivers must remain vigilant to avoid accidents, especially in residential areas where kids are likely to be present.

2. Reducing Traffic Accidents: Speeding and aggressive driving contribute significantly to traffic accidents. By adopting a cautious driving mindset, we can help reduce the number of collisions and save lives.

3. Promoting a Community Culture: A campaign like “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” fosters a culture of safety and responsibility within communities. It encourages drivers to think about their impact on their neighbors and fellow residents.

Key Messages of the Campaign

The “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign conveys several vital messages:

1. Slow Down in Residential Areas: Many communities implement speed limits of 25 mph or less in residential zones. Adhering to these limits is essential for ensuring the safety of children and other pedestrians.

2. Stay Alert and Avoid Distractions: Distracted driving is a leading cause of accidents. Drivers are encouraged to stay focused on the road, refrain from using their phones, and be aware of their surroundings.

3. Watch for Children: Drivers should be especially cautious in areas where children play or walk, such as near schools, parks, and playgrounds. Always be prepared to stop for pedestrians crossing the street.

4. Obey Traffic Signals and Signs: Following traffic laws is crucial for maintaining order on the roads. Adhering to stop signs, yield signs, and traffic signals helps prevent accidents and keeps everyone safe.

Community Involvement and Engagement

Communities can strengthen the impact of the campaign by taking various steps:

1. Educational Programs: Schools and local organizations can host workshops and seminars to educate children and parents about road safety and the importance of responsible driving.

2. Community Signage: Installing signs that remind drivers to “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” at key intersections can serve as constant reminders to prioritize safety.

3. Neighborhood Watch Programs: Engaging residents in watch programs can promote accountability among drivers and encourage community members to report reckless driving behavior.

4. Organizing Events: Communities can host events such as “Family Safety Days” where families can learn about traffic safety and participate in fun activities that emphasize safe driving practices.

Conclusion

The “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign is more than just a slogan; it’s a call to action for all drivers to prioritize safety in their communities. By slowing down, staying alert, and respecting traffic laws, we can create safer streets for everyone, especially our children. Together, let’s work towards fostering a culture of responsibility and care on our roads, ensuring that every child can play and walk freely without fear. Remember, safe driving is not just about obeying the law; it’s about protecting our future.

Utilities for Unpaid Offenders Shut Off: What You Need to Know

 

In a growing trend across the United States, several cities and utility companies are implementing policies that allow them to shut off essential services, such as water, electricity, and gas, for individuals who fail to pay fines related to traffic violations, including red light and speed camera tickets. This controversial practice raises important questions about the balance between enforcing traffic laws and ensuring access to essential services. Here’s what you need to know about these policies and their implications for offenders.

Why Are Utilities Shut Off for Unpaid Offenders?

The rationale behind shutting off utilities for unpaid offenders centers on several key factors:

1. Revenue Generation: Municipalities often face budget constraints, and unpaid fines can significantly impact their financial health. Shutting off utilities serves as a method to collect outstanding debts.

2. Encouraging Compliance: By threatening essential services, cities hope to encourage offenders to pay their fines promptly and deter future violations. The idea is that the potential loss of utilities will motivate individuals to fulfill their financial obligations.

3. Addressing Public Safety: Some argue that ensuring compliance with traffic laws through stricter penalties, including utility shutoffs, enhances overall public safety. The rationale is that enforcing consequences for violations can lead to more responsible driving behavior.

The Controversy Surrounding Utility Shutoffs

While the policies may be intended to improve compliance and generate revenue, they are not without controversy. Key concerns include:

1. Impact on Vulnerable Populations: Shutting off utilities can disproportionately affect low-income individuals and families who may already be struggling to make ends meet. Losing access to water or electricity can create significant hardships, including health and safety risks.

2. Legal and Ethical Questions: Critics argue that punishing individuals for unpaid fines by cutting off essential services raises ethical questions. Is it fair to deny basic necessities as a means of enforcing traffic laws? Additionally, legal challenges may arise regarding the legality of such practices.

3. Ineffective Deterrence: Some studies suggest that harsh penalties, such as utility shutoffs, may not effectively deter future violations. Offenders might simply accumulate more debt rather than changing their behavior.

What Offenders Should Know

If you are facing unpaid fines that could lead to utility shutoffs, here are some steps to consider:

1. Address the Fines Promptly: If you receive a ticket, it’s crucial to address it as soon as possible. Ignoring the issue can lead to increased fines, additional penalties, and potential utility shutoffs.

2. Explore Payment Plans: Many jurisdictions offer payment plans or hardship programs for individuals struggling to pay fines. Contact the issuing authority to discuss your options.

3. Stay Informed About Local Policies: Keep abreast of local policies regarding unpaid fines and utility shutoffs. This will help you understand your rights and responsibilities.

4. Seek Legal Advice: If you believe that a utility shutoff is unfair or unlawful, consider consulting a legal expert. They can help you navigate the legal landscape and explore options for contesting fines or avoiding utility shutoffs.

Conclusion

The practice of shutting off utilities for unpaid traffic violations is a growing trend that raises important questions about fairness, legality, and public safety. While municipalities seek to enforce compliance and generate revenue, it’s crucial to consider the implications for vulnerable populations and the potential ineffectiveness of such measures. For individuals facing unpaid fines, addressing the issue promptly and exploring available options can help prevent severe consequences, including utility shutoff.

Are Cities Required to Use Warning Signs for Photo Enforcement?

Photo enforcement, which includes red light cameras and speed cameras, has become a common method for monitoring traffic violations and enhancing road safety in many cities across the United States. However, a significant question arises: Are cities required to use warning signs for photo enforcement? In this article, we will explore the regulations surrounding photo enforcement signage, the rationale behind their use, and what it means for drivers.

Understanding Photo Enforcement

Photo enforcement refers to the use of automated cameras to capture images of vehicles that violate traffic laws, such as running red lights or exceeding speed limits. These systems have gained popularity as a way to reduce traffic accidents and enforce regulations more efficiently. However, their implementation raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

The Role of Warning Signs

Warning signs play a critical role in informing drivers about photo enforcement measures in place. These signs typically alert motorists to the presence of cameras, ensuring they are aware of potential consequences for violating traffic laws.

Are Warning Signs Legally Required?

The requirement for warning signs related to photo enforcement varies significantly by state and municipality. Here’s an overview of the general landscape:

1. State Regulations: Some states have established laws mandating that cities must post warning signs to inform drivers about the presence of red light and speed cameras. These regulations aim to ensure transparency and reduce the element of surprise when drivers receive tickets.

2. Local Ordinances: Even in states without specific mandates, local municipalities may adopt their own regulations requiring warning signs. This can vary widely depending on the local government's stance on photo enforcement.

3. Best Practices: Many traffic safety advocates recommend the use of warning signs as a best practice, arguing that they enhance driver awareness and compliance with traffic laws. By informing drivers of the presence of cameras, cities can promote safer driving behavior.

Here’s a table summarizing whether warning signs for photo enforcement are required in each state. Keep in mind that regulations can change, and it's essential to check local laws for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

State	Warning Signs Required?
Alabama	No
Alaska	Yes
Arizona	Yes
Arkansas	No
California	Yes
Colorado	Yes
Connecticut	Yes
Delaware	No
District of Columbia	Yes
Florida	Yes
Georgia	No
Hawaii	Yes
Idaho	No
Illinois	Yes
Indiana	No
Iowa	Yes
Kansas	No
Kentucky	No
Louisiana	No
Maine	No
Maryland	Yes
Massachusetts	Yes
Michigan	No
Minnesota	No
Mississippi	No
Missouri	No
Montana	Yes
Nebraska	No
Nevada	Yes
New Hampshire	Yes
New Jersey	Yes
New Mexico	Yes
New York	Yes
North Carolina	Yes
North Dakota	No
Ohio	Yes
Oklahoma	No
Oregon	Yes
Pennsylvania	Yes
Rhode Island	No
South Carolina	Yes
South Dakota	No
Tennessee	Yes
Texas	No
Utah	Yes
Vermont	No
Virginia	Yes
Washington	Yes
West Virginia	No
Wisconsin	No
Wyoming	No

Notes:

• Local Variations: Some states may have local ordinances or municipalities that require warning signs even if the state does not.
• Check for Updates: Always verify with state and local traffic authorities for the most current information regarding photo enforcement and signage requirements.

This table serves as a general guideline and is subject to change based on legislative updates or municipal decisions.

Rationale Behind Warning Signs

The rationale for using warning signs for photo enforcement includes:

• Transparency: Informing drivers about the presence of cameras fosters transparency in traffic enforcement, reducing potential feelings of unfairness or entrapment.

• Safety: Warning signs can encourage drivers to adhere to traffic laws, which ultimately contributes to safer roadways for all users.

• Public Trust: Providing clear communication about enforcement measures can enhance public trust in local government and law enforcement agencies.

The Debate Surrounding Warning Signs

While many support the use of warning signs, there are also arguments against them:

• Effectiveness: Critics argue that the presence of warning signs may lead to drivers only obeying the law when they see a sign, rather than promoting consistent safe driving behavior.

• Revenue Generation: Some believe that requiring warning signs may reduce the effectiveness of photo enforcement systems, as drivers may alter their behavior only when they see the signs, leading to fewer citations and potential revenue loss for municipalities.

Conclusion

Whether cities are required to use warning signs for photo enforcement largely depends on state regulations and local ordinances. While some states mandate their use, others leave the decision to individual municipalities. Regardless of the legal requirements, the presence of warning signs can enhance transparency, promote safer driving habits, and foster public trust in traffic enforcement measures.

For drivers, understanding the regulations surrounding photo enforcement and the use of warning signs is crucial. Staying informed not only helps avoid costly tickets but also contributes to safer roads for everyone. Always check local traffic laws and be aware of your surroundings when driving through areas with photo enforcement.

2010 Court Decision 

People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9, is a recently published case that can be cited and used as precedent (pre-decided cases on the same subject) for all future red light camera tickets, and luckily courts are to adhere to precedent under the legal principle of Stare decisis (not unsettle things which are settled).

Park addresses the issue of warning requirements.

In Park, the defendant was ultimately found not guilty of violating VC§21453 because the photographs depicting the defendant’s vehicle moving through a red light were gathered through an automated enforcement system whereby the issuing City of Santa Ana had not issued warning notices for “each new camera” installed in the city. This published court decision stands for the rule that the issuance of warning notices for the first camera installed in the City, and not for subsequent new cameras, does not satisfy the requirements set forth in VC§21455.5 (b). Typically cities are required to issue a thirty-day warning period which apparently did not happen.

If it comes up at your trial that the city that issued your ticket did not send warning notices for the camera which took your picture or for each new camera installed in the city, only the first one, then be sure to cite this case (case cite is People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9) as the reason why the case against you should be dropped. 

Verra Mobility (VRRM) Stock Hits All Time Highs

VRRM chart by TradingView

Verra Mobility (ticker symbol VRRM) is a company that specializes in technology solutions for the transportation industry, including tolling, red-light enforcement, and traffic management. If the stock hit all-time highs, it suggests that the company's performance and investor sentiment have been positive, driving the stock price to new records.

BMWs Warn Drivers Of Speed Traps And Red-Light Cameras

Talk about an idea that’s long been overdue, especially for cars that are built to be driven aggressively. Some newer BMW models can now be upgraded with a system that warns drivers of the presence of speed detection devices and red-light cameras in the road ahead. That would make BMW the first automaker to sell cars that both help drivers get—and avoid getting—speeding tickets.

Called the Traffic Camera Information system, it’s part of BMW’s ConnectedDrive suite of high-tech in-car services that otherwise include real-time traffic alerts, advanced smartphone and Amazon Alexa connectivity and advanced voice control features. Powered by Here Technologies and Cedar Electronics, it’s similar to a function already being offered as part of the Waze traffic information system. Only rather than rely on reports of speed detection devices submitted by other motorists as Waze does, BMW’s system is based on a nationwide database of installations backed up by a network of radar detectors.

The speed-trap detection function is being offered as a three-month free trial on select 2021 models built after July 1, 2020 and equipped with BMW’s Live Cockpit Professional system. Owners can find more details about the service and check to see if it’s available their vehicle on the BMW ConnectedDrive Store website.

After the trial period expires, users will be asked to sign up for the service on a subscription basis at $25 for 15 months, which seems dirt cheap compared to having to pony up $100 or more to settle a speeding ticket. It’s not the first and certainly won’t be the last subscription-based option BMW will offer as a way to fuel ongoing revenues.

Which states allow speed cameras?

Do All Red Light Camera Intersections Have Warning Signs?

Every Camera Enforced Intersection DOES NOT Have Warning Signs 

The California Vehicle Code only requires that warning signs be posted to notify drivers of camera enforced intersections and that these signs be posted either at all approaches to the intersection or at all main entrances into a city including (freeways, bridges, and state highway routes).

Have you ever wondered why there are photo enforced warning signs for red light cameras at some intersections but not all them? The vehicle code VC§ 21455.5 says (a) (1), “Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes." The purpose of this law is to make sure that drivers are warned in all instances where there is red light camera enforcement.

Many times you will see warning signs posted right next to the traffic signal light, however not always. Sometimes warning signs might even be posted at the previous, non- camera enforced intersection which can be misleading or cause confusion. So while a City may not be in violation of the Vehicle Code requirements if they don’t have warning signs placed at the intersection (since they have a choice in the placement), if any signs you do find are blocked or damaged in a such a way you can’t see them, then you may have something that can help you in getting your ticket dismissed because warning signs do have to be reasonably visible. Be sure to take pictures of the signs to show they are not visible and take them to court with you or include them with your Trial by Written Declaration if you choose to fight your ticket in writing using form TR-205 (available at your local courthouse).

Contributed by ticketbust, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.