Drive Like Your Kids Live Here! A Campaign for Safer Streets

One of my favorite quotes, "Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!"

 

As communities across the country focus on promoting safety, the “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign has emerged as a powerful message aimed at encouraging responsible driving. This initiative serves as a reminder to all motorists that the streets they travel are home to families, children, and pedestrians who deserve protection from reckless driving. Here’s an in-depth look at this important campaign and how it can help create safer neighborhoods for everyone.

The Importance of Safe Driving

Every day, thousands of children navigate their neighborhoods, walking to school, playing outside, and riding bikes. However, as traffic congestion and vehicle speeds increase, the risk of accidents rises dramatically. Safe driving is crucial for several reasons:

1. Protecting Vulnerable Pedestrians: Children are particularly vulnerable due to their size and unpredictability. Drivers must remain vigilant to avoid accidents, especially in residential areas where kids are likely to be present.

2. Reducing Traffic Accidents: Speeding and aggressive driving contribute significantly to traffic accidents. By adopting a cautious driving mindset, we can help reduce the number of collisions and save lives.

3. Promoting a Community Culture: A campaign like “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” fosters a culture of safety and responsibility within communities. It encourages drivers to think about their impact on their neighbors and fellow residents.

Key Messages of the Campaign

The “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign conveys several vital messages:

1. Slow Down in Residential Areas: Many communities implement speed limits of 25 mph or less in residential zones. Adhering to these limits is essential for ensuring the safety of children and other pedestrians.

2. Stay Alert and Avoid Distractions: Distracted driving is a leading cause of accidents. Drivers are encouraged to stay focused on the road, refrain from using their phones, and be aware of their surroundings.

3. Watch for Children: Drivers should be especially cautious in areas where children play or walk, such as near schools, parks, and playgrounds. Always be prepared to stop for pedestrians crossing the street.

4. Obey Traffic Signals and Signs: Following traffic laws is crucial for maintaining order on the roads. Adhering to stop signs, yield signs, and traffic signals helps prevent accidents and keeps everyone safe.

Community Involvement and Engagement

Communities can strengthen the impact of the campaign by taking various steps:

1. Educational Programs: Schools and local organizations can host workshops and seminars to educate children and parents about road safety and the importance of responsible driving.

2. Community Signage: Installing signs that remind drivers to “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” at key intersections can serve as constant reminders to prioritize safety.

3. Neighborhood Watch Programs: Engaging residents in watch programs can promote accountability among drivers and encourage community members to report reckless driving behavior.

4. Organizing Events: Communities can host events such as “Family Safety Days” where families can learn about traffic safety and participate in fun activities that emphasize safe driving practices.

Conclusion

The “Drive Like Your Kids Live Here!” campaign is more than just a slogan; it’s a call to action for all drivers to prioritize safety in their communities. By slowing down, staying alert, and respecting traffic laws, we can create safer streets for everyone, especially our children. Together, let’s work towards fostering a culture of responsibility and care on our roads, ensuring that every child can play and walk freely without fear. Remember, safe driving is not just about obeying the law; it’s about protecting our future.

Utilities for Unpaid Offenders Shut Off: What You Need to Know

 

In a growing trend across the United States, several cities and utility companies are implementing policies that allow them to shut off essential services, such as water, electricity, and gas, for individuals who fail to pay fines related to traffic violations, including red light and speed camera tickets. This controversial practice raises important questions about the balance between enforcing traffic laws and ensuring access to essential services. Here’s what you need to know about these policies and their implications for offenders.

Why Are Utilities Shut Off for Unpaid Offenders?

The rationale behind shutting off utilities for unpaid offenders centers on several key factors:

1. Revenue Generation: Municipalities often face budget constraints, and unpaid fines can significantly impact their financial health. Shutting off utilities serves as a method to collect outstanding debts.

2. Encouraging Compliance: By threatening essential services, cities hope to encourage offenders to pay their fines promptly and deter future violations. The idea is that the potential loss of utilities will motivate individuals to fulfill their financial obligations.

3. Addressing Public Safety: Some argue that ensuring compliance with traffic laws through stricter penalties, including utility shutoffs, enhances overall public safety. The rationale is that enforcing consequences for violations can lead to more responsible driving behavior.

The Controversy Surrounding Utility Shutoffs

While the policies may be intended to improve compliance and generate revenue, they are not without controversy. Key concerns include:

1. Impact on Vulnerable Populations: Shutting off utilities can disproportionately affect low-income individuals and families who may already be struggling to make ends meet. Losing access to water or electricity can create significant hardships, including health and safety risks.

2. Legal and Ethical Questions: Critics argue that punishing individuals for unpaid fines by cutting off essential services raises ethical questions. Is it fair to deny basic necessities as a means of enforcing traffic laws? Additionally, legal challenges may arise regarding the legality of such practices.

3. Ineffective Deterrence: Some studies suggest that harsh penalties, such as utility shutoffs, may not effectively deter future violations. Offenders might simply accumulate more debt rather than changing their behavior.

What Offenders Should Know

If you are facing unpaid fines that could lead to utility shutoffs, here are some steps to consider:

1. Address the Fines Promptly: If you receive a ticket, it’s crucial to address it as soon as possible. Ignoring the issue can lead to increased fines, additional penalties, and potential utility shutoffs.

2. Explore Payment Plans: Many jurisdictions offer payment plans or hardship programs for individuals struggling to pay fines. Contact the issuing authority to discuss your options.

3. Stay Informed About Local Policies: Keep abreast of local policies regarding unpaid fines and utility shutoffs. This will help you understand your rights and responsibilities.

4. Seek Legal Advice: If you believe that a utility shutoff is unfair or unlawful, consider consulting a legal expert. They can help you navigate the legal landscape and explore options for contesting fines or avoiding utility shutoffs.

Conclusion

The practice of shutting off utilities for unpaid traffic violations is a growing trend that raises important questions about fairness, legality, and public safety. While municipalities seek to enforce compliance and generate revenue, it’s crucial to consider the implications for vulnerable populations and the potential ineffectiveness of such measures. For individuals facing unpaid fines, addressing the issue promptly and exploring available options can help prevent severe consequences, including utility shutoff.

Are Cities Required to Use Warning Signs for Photo Enforcement?

Photo enforcement, which includes red light cameras and speed cameras, has become a common method for monitoring traffic violations and enhancing road safety in many cities across the United States. However, a significant question arises: Are cities required to use warning signs for photo enforcement? In this article, we will explore the regulations surrounding photo enforcement signage, the rationale behind their use, and what it means for drivers.

Understanding Photo Enforcement

Photo enforcement refers to the use of automated cameras to capture images of vehicles that violate traffic laws, such as running red lights or exceeding speed limits. These systems have gained popularity as a way to reduce traffic accidents and enforce regulations more efficiently. However, their implementation raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

The Role of Warning Signs

Warning signs play a critical role in informing drivers about photo enforcement measures in place. These signs typically alert motorists to the presence of cameras, ensuring they are aware of potential consequences for violating traffic laws.

Are Warning Signs Legally Required?

The requirement for warning signs related to photo enforcement varies significantly by state and municipality. Here’s an overview of the general landscape:

1. State Regulations: Some states have established laws mandating that cities must post warning signs to inform drivers about the presence of red light and speed cameras. These regulations aim to ensure transparency and reduce the element of surprise when drivers receive tickets.

2. Local Ordinances: Even in states without specific mandates, local municipalities may adopt their own regulations requiring warning signs. This can vary widely depending on the local government's stance on photo enforcement.

3. Best Practices: Many traffic safety advocates recommend the use of warning signs as a best practice, arguing that they enhance driver awareness and compliance with traffic laws. By informing drivers of the presence of cameras, cities can promote safer driving behavior.

Here’s a table summarizing whether warning signs for photo enforcement are required in each state. Keep in mind that regulations can change, and it's essential to check local laws for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

State	Warning Signs Required?
Alabama	No
Alaska	Yes
Arizona	Yes
Arkansas	No
California	Yes
Colorado	Yes
Connecticut	Yes
Delaware	No
District of Columbia	Yes
Florida	Yes
Georgia	No
Hawaii	Yes
Idaho	No
Illinois	Yes
Indiana	No
Iowa	Yes
Kansas	No
Kentucky	No
Louisiana	No
Maine	No
Maryland	Yes
Massachusetts	Yes
Michigan	No
Minnesota	No
Mississippi	No
Missouri	No
Montana	Yes
Nebraska	No
Nevada	Yes
New Hampshire	Yes
New Jersey	Yes
New Mexico	Yes
New York	Yes
North Carolina	Yes
North Dakota	No
Ohio	Yes
Oklahoma	No
Oregon	Yes
Pennsylvania	Yes
Rhode Island	No
South Carolina	Yes
South Dakota	No
Tennessee	Yes
Texas	No
Utah	Yes
Vermont	No
Virginia	Yes
Washington	Yes
West Virginia	No
Wisconsin	No
Wyoming	No

Notes:

• Local Variations: Some states may have local ordinances or municipalities that require warning signs even if the state does not.
• Check for Updates: Always verify with state and local traffic authorities for the most current information regarding photo enforcement and signage requirements.

This table serves as a general guideline and is subject to change based on legislative updates or municipal decisions.

Rationale Behind Warning Signs

The rationale for using warning signs for photo enforcement includes:

• Transparency: Informing drivers about the presence of cameras fosters transparency in traffic enforcement, reducing potential feelings of unfairness or entrapment.

• Safety: Warning signs can encourage drivers to adhere to traffic laws, which ultimately contributes to safer roadways for all users.

• Public Trust: Providing clear communication about enforcement measures can enhance public trust in local government and law enforcement agencies.

The Debate Surrounding Warning Signs

While many support the use of warning signs, there are also arguments against them:

• Effectiveness: Critics argue that the presence of warning signs may lead to drivers only obeying the law when they see a sign, rather than promoting consistent safe driving behavior.

• Revenue Generation: Some believe that requiring warning signs may reduce the effectiveness of photo enforcement systems, as drivers may alter their behavior only when they see the signs, leading to fewer citations and potential revenue loss for municipalities.

Conclusion

Whether cities are required to use warning signs for photo enforcement largely depends on state regulations and local ordinances. While some states mandate their use, others leave the decision to individual municipalities. Regardless of the legal requirements, the presence of warning signs can enhance transparency, promote safer driving habits, and foster public trust in traffic enforcement measures.

For drivers, understanding the regulations surrounding photo enforcement and the use of warning signs is crucial. Staying informed not only helps avoid costly tickets but also contributes to safer roads for everyone. Always check local traffic laws and be aware of your surroundings when driving through areas with photo enforcement.

2010 Court Decision 

People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9, is a recently published case that can be cited and used as precedent (pre-decided cases on the same subject) for all future red light camera tickets, and luckily courts are to adhere to precedent under the legal principle of Stare decisis (not unsettle things which are settled).

Park addresses the issue of warning requirements.

In Park, the defendant was ultimately found not guilty of violating VC§21453 because the photographs depicting the defendant’s vehicle moving through a red light were gathered through an automated enforcement system whereby the issuing City of Santa Ana had not issued warning notices for “each new camera” installed in the city. This published court decision stands for the rule that the issuance of warning notices for the first camera installed in the City, and not for subsequent new cameras, does not satisfy the requirements set forth in VC§21455.5 (b). Typically cities are required to issue a thirty-day warning period which apparently did not happen.

If it comes up at your trial that the city that issued your ticket did not send warning notices for the camera which took your picture or for each new camera installed in the city, only the first one, then be sure to cite this case (case cite is People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9) as the reason why the case against you should be dropped. 

Verra Mobility (VRRM) Stock Hits All Time Highs

VRRM chart by TradingView

Verra Mobility (ticker symbol VRRM) is a company that specializes in technology solutions for the transportation industry, including tolling, red-light enforcement, and traffic management. If the stock hit all-time highs, it suggests that the company's performance and investor sentiment have been positive, driving the stock price to new records.

Red Light Camera Warning Signs

Ever wonder why there are warning signs for red-light cameras at some intersections but not all? According to VC§ 21455.5(a) (1), “Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes." The purpose of the law is obviously to make sure that drivers are warned in all instances where there is red light camera enforcement, and the seemingly most obvious way to warn a driver is to post a warning sign say overhead on a traffic signal head, but the law doesn’t require it.

The law does require that warning signs be posted, but the law gives cities the choice in where to post the signs and the law is vague as to how CLOSE to the intersection the signs have to be posted (provided the city decides to post the signs at the intersection). According to the Cal Trans design, the signs must be at least 30 inches wide by 40 inches high and 6 feet off the ground but there is no requirement as to the distance a sign must be posted in relation to an intersection. Warning signs will not always be posted right at an intersection so drivers should be on the lookout for such signs when entering a city or exiting from a freeway off-ramp. If you do get a red light photo ticket you should go back and search for warning signs and if you can’t find anywhere they are supposed to be or the signs are there but they are not the right size or are blocked or damaged in such a way that they are not visible, then take photographs so you can dispute the ticket. If the signs weren’t posted in accordance with the law (VC§ 21455.5(a) (1) ) then as a result you weren’t given the required notice and more importantly, a foundational requirement (warning signs) for the camera enforcement system is lacking. - blog Submitted by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

Related articles: 

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

BMWs Warn Drivers Of Speed Traps And Red-Light Cameras

Talk about an idea that’s long been overdue, especially for cars that are built to be driven aggressively. Some newer BMW models can now be upgraded with a system that warns drivers of the presence of speed detection devices and red-light cameras in the road ahead. That would make BMW the first automaker to sell cars that both help drivers get—and avoid getting—speeding tickets.

Called the Traffic Camera Information system, it’s part of BMW’s ConnectedDrive suite of high-tech in-car services that otherwise include real-time traffic alerts, advanced smartphone and Amazon Alexa connectivity and advanced voice control features. Powered by Here Technologies and Cedar Electronics, it’s similar to a function already being offered as part of the Waze traffic information system. Only rather than rely on reports of speed detection devices submitted by other motorists as Waze does, BMW’s system is based on a nationwide database of installations backed up by a network of radar detectors.

The speed-trap detection function is being offered as a three-month free trial on select 2021 models built after July 1, 2020 and equipped with BMW’s Live Cockpit Professional system. Owners can find more details about the service and check to see if it’s available their vehicle on the BMW ConnectedDrive Store website.

After the trial period expires, users will be asked to sign up for the service on a subscription basis at $25 for 15 months, which seems dirt cheap compared to having to pony up $100 or more to settle a speeding ticket. It’s not the first and certainly won’t be the last subscription-based option BMW will offer as a way to fuel ongoing revenues.

Which states allow speed cameras?

Where Are The Solar Speed Radar Signs Located?

Just a reminder that we are tracking these solar speed radar sign locations. 

Which states allow speed cameras?

We call these locations "speed radar signs" in our database.  The new speed radar signs are typically solar-powered like this image below.  They don't issue tickets but flash when you are going over the speed limit to warn you to slow down.  

These new cameras are popping up all over the place and you can easily add them to our database here.  The locations are important to track in the database because they are typically dangerous locations around schools, parks, and schools.  

Submit a new solar speed radar sign here. 

As of May 2020 we have 53 speed radar signs in our map and would like to add more with your help. See the map below. 

Do All Red Light Camera Intersections Have Warning Signs?

Every Camera Enforced Intersection DOES NOT Have Warning Signs 

The California Vehicle Code only requires that warning signs be posted to notify drivers of camera enforced intersections and that these signs be posted either at all approaches to the intersection or at all main entrances into a city including (freeways, bridges, and state highway routes).

Have you ever wondered why there are photo enforced warning signs for red light cameras at some intersections but not all them? The vehicle code VC§ 21455.5 says (a) (1), “Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes." The purpose of this law is to make sure that drivers are warned in all instances where there is red light camera enforcement.

Many times you will see warning signs posted right next to the traffic signal light, however not always. Sometimes warning signs might even be posted at the previous, non- camera enforced intersection which can be misleading or cause confusion. So while a City may not be in violation of the Vehicle Code requirements if they don’t have warning signs placed at the intersection (since they have a choice in the placement), if any signs you do find are blocked or damaged in a such a way you can’t see them, then you may have something that can help you in getting your ticket dismissed because warning signs do have to be reasonably visible. Be sure to take pictures of the signs to show they are not visible and take them to court with you or include them with your Trial by Written Declaration if you choose to fight your ticket in writing using form TR-205 (available at your local courthouse).

Contributed by ticketbust, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.