Top Red Light Camera Companies Ranked by 2024 Revenue

Red light camera enforcement has become a major industry driven by the need for traffic safety, automated violations processing, and smart city integration. But which companies lead the market in terms of size and revenue?

Below is a breakdown of the top global and regional red light camera system manufacturers, ranked by their estimated 2024 revenues, including companies like Verra Mobility, Jenoptik, Sensys Gatso, and others.

📊 2024 Red Light Camera Company Revenue Rankings

Rank	Company	Estimated 2024 Revenue (USD)	Notes
1	Swarco Traffic	$1.25 Billion	Includes broader traffic control, not just red light cameras
2	Jenoptik Group	$1.22 Billion	Global traffic enforcement and optical tech leader
3	Verra Mobility	$879 Million	Includes American Traffic Solutions (ATS) and Redflex
4	Iteris Inc.	$172 Million	ITS sensors and data analytics, not camera-focused
5	Miovision	$76 Million	Growing in smart city traffic camera deployments
6	Redflex Holdings	$75 Million	Now part of Verra; still active in some markets
7	Sensys Gatso Group	$63 Million	Strong European presence in automated enforcement
8	Traffic Logix	Not Disclosed	Privately held; regional deployments in North America
9	Peek Traffic / PIPS Technology / TrafficVision	Not Disclosed	Specialized vendors with niche contracts and products

🌐 Who Dominates the Red Light Camera Industry?

The clear revenue leader for enforcement-focused technology is Verra Mobility, which processes millions of speed and red light violations each year for cities like New York, Chicago, Washington D.C., and Phoenix. Verra owns both ATS (American Traffic Solutions) and Redflex, previously its top competitors.

Swarco and Jenoptik lead globally in infrastructure-scale traffic systems, though only a portion of their business involves red light cameras. Their revenues reflect broader ITS deployments such as smart signals, lane control, and LED signage.

Smaller firms like Miovision, Traffic Logix, and Peek Traffic focus on specific municipal or regional contracts and often integrate with broader smart city technologies.

📍 Why This Matters

Understanding which companies lead the red light camera industry is important for:

• City governments looking to partner with reliable vendors
• Investors evaluating public firms like Verra Mobility (NASDAQ: VRRM)
• Citizens and advocates analyzing the spread and impact of traffic enforcement

As the market grows—expected to surpass $2 billion globally by 2033—knowing the major players helps stakeholders understand how automation is shaping traffic safety, surveillance, and privacy.

🔗 Learn More

• Verra Mobility (VRRM) Investor Relations
• Sensys Gatso Group Financials
• Jenoptik Traffic Solutions

Tags: red light camera companies, Verra Mobility, traffic enforcement systems, Redflex, Swarco, Jenoptik, speed camera vendors, traffic technology providers, 2024 revenue ranking

🚦 Rolling Right Turns: A Hidden Goldmine for Cities?

Are Right Turns on Red Quietly Taxing Drivers?

Red Light and Speed Camera Vendors in the U.S. – Who Operates Where?

Red light and speed cameras play a significant role in traffic enforcement across the United States. While some advocate for their safety benefits, others raise concerns about their implementation. Central to this discussion are the private vendors responsible for these automated enforcement systems. This guide provides an overview of the top red light and speed camera vendors in the U.S. and highlights their areas of operation.

Top Red Light and Speed Camera Vendors in the U.S.

1. Verra Mobility

• Headquarters: Mesa, Arizona

• Markets Served: Over 500 cities across the U.S.

• Notable Locations:Chicago, IL; New York City, NY; Orlando, FL; Seattle, WA

• Services: Red light cameras, speed cameras, school bus stop-arm enforcement

Verra Mobility is a leading provider of smart mobility technology solutions. They offer comprehensive red-light safety solutions, including hardware, software, and services to capture violations. Their systems are designed to reduce red-light running and prevent crashes. Vera Mobility

2. Sensys Gatso Group

• Headquarters: Jönköping, Sweden (U.S. offices in Beverly, Massachusetts)

• Markets Served: 15+ U.S. states

• Notable Locations: Albany, NY; Des Moines, IA; Miami-Dade County, FL

• Services: Speed enforcement, red light cameras, automated traffic enforcement solutions

Sensys Gatso specializes in innovative traffic enforcement solutions. Their T-Series red light system enforces wide intersections with high detection and imaging accuracy, operating independently from traffic signal controllers. 

3. Rekor Systems

• Headquarters: Columbia, Maryland

• Markets Served: Expanding across multiple states

• Notable Locations: Montgomery County, MD; various school zones in Georgia and Texas

• Services: AI-powered vehicle recognition, speed enforcement, red light detection, license plate readers (LPR)

Rekor Systems offers advanced traffic data collection services, blending traditional techniques with AI-based approaches. Their solutions include AI-based video detection, radar detection, and portable traffic data collection methods.

4. Jenoptik

• Headquarters: Jena, Germany (U.S. office in Jupiter, Florida)

• Markets Served: Selected states in the U.S., especially in the Northeast and Florida

• Notable Locations: Fort Lauderdale, FL; Maryland; Pennsylvania

• Services: Speed enforcement, red light enforcement, smart city solutions 

Jenoptik provides comprehensive road safety solutions, including mobile, semi-stationary, and stationary speed enforcement systems. Their technology is designed to increase road safety by reducing speeding and red light violations. 

5. Redflex Traffic Systems

• Headquarters: Formerly Phoenix, Arizona

• Markets Served: Merged with Verra Mobility in 2021

• Notable Locations (Pre-Merger): Los Angeles, CA; Newark, NJ; Chicago, IL

• Services: Red light cameras, speed cameras, mobile enforcement

Redflex was a significant player in the traffic enforcement industry before its acquisition by Verra Mobility in 2021. The merger expanded Verra Mobility's reach and consolidated the market.

Where These Vendors Operate: State and City Breakdown

Here's a snapshot of where the major vendors have contracts:

City/State	Vendor	Camera Type
Chicago, IL	Verra Mobility	Speed & Red Light Cameras
New York City, NY	Jenoptik	Speed Cameras
Miami-Dade County, FL	Sensys Gatso	Red Light Cameras
Fort Lauderdale, FL	Jenoptik	Speed Cameras
Montgomery County, MD	Rekor Systems	School Zone Speed Cameras
Albany, NY	Sensys Gatso	Speed & Red Light Cameras
Des Moines, IA	Sensys Gatso	Speed Enforcement
Newark, NJ	Verra Mobility (Redflex legacy)	Red Light Cameras

Note: Camera vendor contracts may change due to new bids or legislation.

Controversy and Legal Challenges

Many cities have faced public backlash and lawsuits over automated enforcement. Common concerns include:

• Accuracy and fairness of ticketing

• Lack of due process for motorists

• Revenue-sharing models between cities and vendors

• Disproportionate placement in low-income neighborhoods

Some states have banned or heavily restricted the use of red light and speed cameras altogether, including Texas, New Hampshire, and Mississippi.

Final Thoughts

Whether viewed as safety tools or revenue generators, red light and speed cameras are prevalent in many parts of the U.S. Understanding who operates them and where they're located helps drivers stay informed and potentially avoid costly citations.

Want to know where cameras are in your city?

Check out our growing directory of Speed and Red Light Camera Locations by City for detailed maps and vendor data.

Are Judges Throwing Out Red Light Camera Cases? What You Need to Know

Red light cameras have been a point of controversy in cities across the United States for years. While municipalities argue these automated systems improve road safety and reduce traffic violations, many drivers see them as a cash grab. Recently, there's been a growing trend across various jurisdictions: judges are throwing out red light camera cases. But why is this happening, and what does it mean for drivers who’ve received a ticket?

Why Are Red Light Camera Tickets Being Dismissed?

Several legal and constitutional issues have prompted courts to toss out red light camera tickets. Some of the most common reasons include:

1. Due Process Violations

Many drivers argue that red light camera tickets violate their right to due process. Tickets are often issued to the vehicle owner, regardless of who was driving. In several cases, judges have ruled that this method fails to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. Improper Issuance by Private Companies

In some jurisdictions, the companies operating red light cameras are private, not governmental agencies. Judges have dismissed cases on the grounds that only law enforcement has the authority to issue traffic citations — not third-party contractors.

3. Lack of Proper Evidence

Courts have also rejected red light camera tickets where the evidence (e.g., video or still images) was blurry, inconclusive, or did not clearly establish a violation.

4. Failure to Properly Serve Notice

Some cities fail to follow the correct legal procedures when notifying drivers of a red light camera violation. If a driver doesn't receive timely or accurate notice, a judge may dismiss the case.

Cities Where Judges Are Dismissing Red Light Camera Tickets

While this varies by location, there have been noteworthy developments in cities like:

• Chicago, IL – Judges have thrown out thousands of tickets due to improper notification procedures.

• Los Angeles, CA – The city stopped enforcing red light camera tickets after courts frequently sided with drivers.

• Cleveland, OH – Courts ruled the program unconstitutional unless a police officer issued the citation.

• New Miami, OH – The village was ordered to refund millions in red light camera fines after courts deemed the system illegal.

Can You Fight a Red Light Camera Ticket?

Yes — and more people are winning than ever before. Here's how:

1. Request a Court Hearing

Don’t automatically pay the fine. Contest the ticket in court, where you can argue your case and possibly have it dismissed.

2. Challenge the Evidence

Ask for photographic or video evidence. If the quality is poor or the violation is unclear, the judge may rule in your favor.

3. Cite Precedent Cases

If you live in an area where courts have recently ruled against red light camera programs, referencing those decisions can strengthen your defense.

4. Consult a Traffic Attorney

Many lawyers specialize in traffic cases and offer free consultations. An experienced attorney can identify legal flaws in your ticket.

Are Red Light Cameras Being Phased Out?

Some cities have responded to legal pushback and public outcry by removing red light cameras altogether. Others have restructured their programs to ensure legal compliance. However, many municipalities still rely on them as a revenue source — so knowing your rights remains essential.

Final Thoughts

If you’ve received a red light camera ticket, don’t assume you have to pay it. Increasingly, judges are throwing out red light camera cases due to constitutional concerns, improper evidence, and flawed enforcement practices. Understanding the legal landscape can help you make informed decisions — and possibly beat the ticket altogether.

Illinois Lawmakers Have Considered Statewide Bans on Red Light Cameras

Lawmakers in Springfield, Illinois are set to debate a new bill this week that could lead to a statewide ban on automated red light cameras—a move that may dramatically change how traffic enforcement is handled across the state.

Proposed Bill Could Eliminate Red Light Cameras in Illinois

The legislation, which has garnered bipartisan support from both leading Republicans and Democrats, seeks to eliminate the authority of counties and municipalities to use automated red light cameras. These systems, which automatically issue tickets to drivers who enter intersections after the light turns red, have been widely deployed throughout Chicago and its suburbs.

What remains unclear is whether the proposed ban would apply only to new camera installations or if existing red light cameras would be removed as well. Historically, similar efforts in other states have allowed existing contracts with camera vendors—such as Redflex and American Traffic Solutions (ATS)—to run their course before requiring removal.

Illinois Among the Top States for Red Light Cameras

According to PhotoEnforced.com, Illinois is one of the fastest-growing states for red light camera usage. The site tracks the growth of traffic enforcement cameras nationwide, and its open database reports over 700 monitored intersections across Illinois. More than two-thirds of those are located in Chicago, making it one of the most heavily monitored cities in the country.

The Ongoing Debate: Safety vs. Revenue

Supporters of red light cameras argue that they help reduce traffic collisions, especially at high-risk intersections. They claim the threat of a ticket encourages safer driving behavior and saves lives.

However, opponents argue that the cameras are more about generating revenue than improving road safety. Many critics cite short yellow light times and lack of due process as reasons to discontinue their use. Others point to data suggesting that while T-bone accidents may decline, rear-end collisions often increase due to sudden braking at camera-equipped intersections.

What's Next?

The outcome of Tuesday’s legislative session could determine the future of automated traffic enforcement in Illinois. If the bill passes, it may set a precedent for other states considering similar bans.

Drivers, local governments, and traffic safety advocates across Illinois will be closely watching to see whether lawmakers prioritize public safety or choose to pull the plug on a controversial enforcement tool.

Updated Red Light and Speed Camera Fine Information by State

As a driver, understanding the laws and fines associated with red light cameras and speed cameras is crucial for maintaining good driving habits and avoiding unexpected expenses. This article provides an updated overview of the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations across the United States. Please note that these fines can vary by municipality, so it’s essential to check local regulations for the most accurate information.

Red Light Camera Fines and Points

The table below summarizes the current fines and points for red light camera violations in each state:

State	Red Light Camera Fine ($)	Red Light Camera Points
Alabama	$100	No Points
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	No Programs	-
California	$490	1 Point
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	$75-$230	-
District of Columbia	$150	0 to 2 Points
Florida	$200	-
Georgia	$70	No Points
Hawaii	$77	-
Illinois	$100-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	$100-$140	No Points
Maryland	$100	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	$100	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	$85	No Points
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$50-$100	No Points
North Carolina	$50-$100	3 Points
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$260-$1,000	-
Pennsylvania	$100	No Points
Rhode Island	$75	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	State Ban	-
Virginia	$100-$200	0 to 4 Points
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Speed Camera Fines and Points

In addition to red light cameras, many states also have speed camera programs. Below is a summary of speed camera fines and points across the states:

State	Speed Camera Fine ($)	Speed Camera Points
Alabama	-	-
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	-	-
California	-	-
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	-	-
District of Columbia	$50-$300	0, 3, 4, 5 Points
Florida	-	-
Georgia	-	-
Hawaii	-	-
Illinois	$250-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	-	-
Maryland	$40-$1,000	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	-	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	-	-
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$90-$1,200	No Points (Possible Jail Time)
North Carolina	-	-
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$110-$2,000	-
Pennsylvania	-	-
Rhode Island	-	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	-	-
Virginia	-	-
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Important Notes

• Local Variations: Keep in mind that this information can vary widely by municipality within each state. It’s essential to verify specific details with local laws or law enforcement agencies.

• Changes in Regulations: Traffic laws and fines can change frequently. Drivers should regularly check for updates in their state or locality to stay informed.

• Safe Driving Practices: To avoid the potential of incurring fines or points on your license, always adhere to traffic signals and speed limits, and practice safe driving habits.

By understanding the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations in your state, you can better navigate the roads and make informed decisions as a driver. Always stay updated on your local traffic laws to ensure a safe and compliant driving experience.

Verra Mobility, Redflex, ATS and Red Light Camera Installation and Mainence Costs

Red light cameras play a critical role in traffic enforcement, enhancing safety by discouraging drivers from running red lights. In the U.S., several companies dominate the market, including Redflex Traffic Systems, American Traffic Solutions (ATS), and the newer addition, Verra Mobility, which has absorbed ATS. Each company offers a range of pricing models and service contracts that significantly impact municipal budgets. This article reveals the installation and operational costs associated with these companies' red light camera systems and highlights how their pricing structures can influence city expenditures. 

Understanding Red Light Camera Costs

Red light camera programs are multi-layered, requiring investment not only in equipment but also in ongoing maintenance, data processing, and sometimes personnel. This complexity explains the considerable costs associated with these programs.

Key Cost Components:

1. Installation Fees: Installing a red light camera typically costs between $50,000 and $100,000 per intersection, covering equipment, cameras, sensors, and initial setup.
2. Operational Costs: Maintenance and operational expenses range from $15,000 to $30,000 per camera annually, including data processing, software updates, calibration, and staffing.
3. Contract Models: Red light camera companies offer either revenue-sharing or fixed-fee models. Some cities prefer revenue-sharing contracts to reduce initial costs, while others opt for fixed fees for budget predictability.

Redflex Red Light Camera Costs

Redflex Traffic Systems has been a leader in the U.S. red light camera industry for over 20 years. They provide end-to-end services, from installation to violation processing.

1. Installation & Setup Costs: Redflex typically charges $65,000 to $75,000 per camera, depending on the city and specific location. This includes equipment, sensors, and software setup.
2. Annual Maintenance Fees: Redflex charges approximately $20,000 to $25,000 per camera for yearly maintenance. This cost covers software updates, data storage, and equipment upkeep.
3. Revenue-Sharing Model: Redflex often uses a revenue-sharing contract, taking a percentage of the fines collected. This model can reduce upfront costs for cities, although it often includes a fixed minimum revenue guarantee.

ATS (American Traffic Solutions) Red Light Camera Costs

American Traffic Solutions (ATS), now part of Verra Mobility, provides various traffic enforcement solutions across the U.S. ATS is known for its flexibility, offering a range of pricing options and service models to suit different municipal budgets.

1. Installation Costs: ATS installation costs range between $50,000 and $70,000 per camera, with options for leasing equipment to help cities reduce upfront expenses.
2. Maintenance & Operational Costs: ATS charges around $15,000 to $25,000 per camera annually for maintenance, covering data storage, software updates, and equipment servicing.
3. Revenue and Cost-Sharing Models: ATS offers revenue-sharing agreements, allowing cities to split ticket revenue with ATS instead of paying a flat rate, making it more budget-friendly initially.

Verra Mobility Red Light Camera Costs

Verra Mobility, which absorbed ATS, is now a prominent name in the red light camera industry and offers an extensive range of traffic enforcement solutions to municipalities. Verra Mobility provides similar cost structures to ATS but with expanded service capabilities, including advanced data management and analytics tools.

1. Installation Fees: Verra Mobility’s installation fees typically fall between $60,000 and $80,000 per intersection, with the option to lease equipment, allowing cities to minimize capital expenditures.
2. Annual Maintenance & Operation Fees: Verra Mobility charges approximately $20,000 to $30,000 per camera annually for maintenance and operational services, which includes equipment maintenance, software updates, and data processing.
3. Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Verra Mobility offers flexible revenue-sharing agreements similar to ATS, where they may receive a percentage of ticket revenue. These contracts help reduce initial costs for cities and often come with customizable service levels, allowing municipalities to adjust based on budget and enforcement needs.

Comparing Redflex, ATS, and Verra Mobility: Which Is More Cost-Effective?

Each company provides different service levels and pricing structures, and the choice depends on a city’s budget, enforcement goals, and long-term strategy:

• Redflex offers robust service but can be costly due to its minimum revenue guarantees.
• ATS, as part of Verra Mobility, has a reputation for flexible cost-sharing, making it attractive to cities with smaller budgets.
• Verra Mobility provides advanced technology and scalable options, ideal for cities needing more customization in their traffic enforcement programs.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Red Light Camera Solution

Cities should evaluate the red light camera program's cost-benefit ratio, considering the price points for installation, maintenance, and potential revenue from citations. Redflex, ATS, and Verra Mobility each offer distinct advantages that align with different city goals. By understanding the pricing structures and service models of each provider, municipalities can make more informed decisions to enhance public safety while managing enforcement costs effectively.

Goldman Sachs Invests $50M in ATS American Traffic Solutions

In 2008, Goldman Sachs made a strategic investment of approximately $50 million in American Traffic Solutions (ATS), a leading provider of red-light and speed camera enforcement solutions. While the exact figure was initially undisclosed, industry reports described the investment as a significant minority stake. The move positioned Goldman Sachs on ATS’s board of directors and provided crucial funding to meet rising nationwide demand for automated traffic enforcement systems.

Scottsdale, AZ-based ATS was, at the time, the largest independent, privately held company offering photo traffic enforcement services in North America. The company experienced rapid expansion, with its 2007–08 quarterly compound revenue growth rate exceeding 80%. As of the investment, photo enforcement programs were in use in over 300 communities across 25 states and the District of Columbia.

ATS served more than 125 municipalities in 18 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Alberta, Canada. Major cities such as New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Houston, Fort Worth, Phoenix, St. Louis, Seattle, and San Diego were all clients of ATS.

The capital from Goldman Sachs helped ATS scale its operations, develop camera technologies, and expand deployment capabilities. This investment marked one of the earliest signs of Wall Street’s interest in smart city infrastructure and traffic enforcement technologies.

Competitive Landscape

ATS’s largest competitor was Redflex Group, an Australian-based photo enforcement provider. The two companies competed for city contracts across North America, offering red-light camera systems, speed enforcement, and other automated traffic safety solutions.

Acquisition and Legacy

In 2017, ATS was acquired by Platinum Equity, a global private equity firm. It was later integrated into Verra Mobility, which today operates one of the largest portfolios of traffic enforcement, tolling, and vehicle compliance technologies in the world.

The Goldman Sachs investment was a pivotal milestone in ATS’s growth and helped accelerate the proliferation of automated enforcement programs. These programs remain controversial—praised for improving road safety, but often criticized as revenue-generating mechanisms for cities and private firms.

To explore photo enforcement locations and trends, visit PhotoEnforced.com.

Public Records Resistance in Iowa

Access to public records is a fundamental right in many parts of the world, essential for transparency and accountability. In Iowa, however, there are increasing concerns about resistance to releasing certain types of public data, especially regarding traffic enforcement records, such as those from speed cameras and red-light cameras. Understanding the challenges surrounding public records in Iowa can help residents, journalists, and advocates push for more transparent practices. This article explores the barriers to public records access in Iowa, why these records are crucial, and how the state compares with others on this issue.

Why Public Records Matter in Iowa

Public records are essential for government transparency, giving the public insight into how taxpayer money is used and providing accountability for government actions. In Iowa, traffic enforcement records—such as data from red-light and speed cameras—can help the public understand enforcement patterns, assess traffic safety programs, and hold institutions accountable for the use of automated traffic cameras.

Access to these records allows Iowans to:

• Verify enforcement accuracy: Errors in traffic citations can be challenged when records are accessible.
• Hold public agencies accountable: Review agencies’ spending on traffic enforcement, especially in areas where automated cameras are in use.
• Evaluate public safety effectiveness: Determine if red-light or speed cameras actually improve road safety or if they disproportionately generate revenue without substantial safety benefits.

Challenges to Public Records Access in Iowa

Despite these benefits, Iowa has seen resistance from some government agencies in releasing public records. Here are some key challenges to accessing this information:

1. Privacy Concerns

   • Iowa agencies cite privacy as a primary reason for restricting access to traffic enforcement data. While privacy protection is essential, Iowa’s laws sometimes overly restrict information, leaving residents unable to assess how public resources are used.

2. Cost of Access

   • In many cases, obtaining public records can incur high fees, often justified by the need to cover the time and labor required to produce the information. These costs can deter ordinary citizens from accessing data and reduce public scrutiny.

3. Lack of Transparency in Record-Keeping

   • Record-keeping practices can sometimes be inconsistent or lack transparency, making it difficult to track down specific information. When agencies aren’t required to provide detailed reports, it leads to inconsistencies in data accessibility.

4. Limited Resources for Records Requests

   • Agencies often claim limited resources to handle records requests in a timely manner. This results in delays that can take weeks, months, or even years, effectively rendering some data unusable for time-sensitive investigations or reports.

How Iowa’s Public Records Resistance Compares with Other States

Public records laws vary widely across the United States. Some states have robust systems in place to ensure data accessibility, while others, like Iowa, place significant hurdles before citizens. Here’s how Iowa compares with other states:

• Stricter Regulations: While states like California have relatively accessible public records laws, Iowa has stricter regulations that can hinder transparency, particularly around automated traffic enforcement data.
• Higher Fees for Access: States like Texas offer many public records at minimal costs, making it easy for residents to access data. In Iowa, however, fees can sometimes be prohibitively high.
• Lengthy Processing Times: States with better funding and streamlined procedures, like Washington, allow for quicker processing of public records requests. Iowa's process, however, can take significantly longer, adding frustration for those seeking timely data.

Potential Solutions for Improving Public Records Access in Iowa

1. Revisiting Privacy Laws: Updating laws to maintain a balance between privacy and transparency can ensure that the public gets access to essential information without compromising individual privacy rights.

2. Standardizing Record-Keeping Practices: By implementing standardized record-keeping practices across all agencies, Iowa can reduce discrepancies and improve data consistency, making it easier for residents to locate information.

3. Streamlining the Request Process: Simplifying the request process through online portals and efficient systems can speed up response times and reduce bureaucratic red tape.

4. Reducing Access Fees: Lowering or eliminating fees for public records requests, especially for journalists and researchers, would encourage transparency and public oversight.

5. Implementing a Digital Database: Iowa could establish a centralized digital repository where non-sensitive public records are available on demand, without needing to request them individually.

Why Public Records Matter to Iowa Residents

Ultimately, public records serve the public’s interest by promoting government accountability and transparency. For Iowans, having access to enforcement data can shed light on traffic safety initiatives, guide public opinion on automated enforcement, and influence local and state-level policy decisions.

Conclusion

While Iowa faces challenges in providing transparent access to public records, particularly in traffic enforcement, progress can be made with targeted reforms. Balancing privacy with transparency, reducing fees, and improving response times are all achievable goals that would bring Iowa closer to an open-access model. By addressing these issues, Iowa can ensure its citizens have the information they need to make informed decisions and hold government agencies accountable.

Understanding Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement: What You Need to Know

Parking ticket photo enforcement has become an increasingly common practice in many cities across the United States and beyond. This automated system captures images of vehicles parked in violation of local regulations, making it easier for municipalities to enforce parking laws without the need for a parking attendant. In this article, we will delve into how parking ticket photo enforcement works, its benefits and drawbacks, and what drivers should know to avoid getting ticketed.

How Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement Works

Parking ticket photo enforcement systems use automated cameras and technology to monitor parking violations. Here’s how the process typically unfolds:

1. Camera Installation: Cities install cameras in high-traffic areas, near parking meters, or at locations with a history of parking violations. These cameras are often equipped with license plate recognition software.

2. Monitoring: The cameras continuously monitor parked vehicles. When a vehicle is detected in a restricted area or when time expires at a metered space, the camera captures images of the vehicle, including its license plate.

3. Ticket Generation: Once a violation is detected, the system automatically generates a parking ticket. The images captured by the camera, along with relevant details such as the date, time, and location of the violation, are typically included in the ticket.

4. Notification: The vehicle owner is then notified of the parking ticket, usually by mail or through an online portal. This notification includes instructions for payment or contesting the ticket.

Benefits of Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement

Parking ticket photo enforcement systems offer several advantages for cities and drivers alike:

• Increased Efficiency: Automated systems allow cities to enforce parking regulations without the need for parking attendants. This can free up resources for other important city functions.

• Reduced Human Error: Automated ticketing reduces the chances of human error that can occur with manual enforcement. This can lead to more accurate ticketing.

• Consistency: Automated systems provide consistent enforcement of parking regulations. This helps deter violations and promotes compliance among drivers.

• Improved Revenue: For municipalities, photo enforcement can lead to increased revenue from parking fines, which can be reinvested into local services and infrastructure.

Drawbacks of Parking Ticket Photo Enforcement

Despite the benefits, parking ticket photo enforcement is not without its drawbacks:

• Public Outcry: Many drivers feel that automated ticketing systems can be unfair and may lead to excessive ticketing. This has sparked debates about the ethics of photo enforcement.

• Lack of Human Judgment: Automated systems cannot take into account the unique circumstances of each violation, which may lead to tickets being issued for legitimate situations, such as emergency stops or vehicle malfunctions.

• Privacy Concerns: The use of cameras to monitor parking can raise privacy issues for some individuals, leading to concerns about surveillance and data security.

Tips to Avoid Parking Tickets from Photo Enforcement

To minimize the risk of receiving a parking ticket through photo enforcement, consider the following tips:

1. Know the Rules: Familiarize yourself with local parking regulations, including time limits, restricted zones, and metered parking requirements.

2. Pay Attention to Signage: Always check for parking signs that indicate restrictions in the area. These signs will inform you of the rules in place and help you avoid violations.

3. Set Timers: If you park at a metered space, consider setting a timer on your phone to remind you when it’s time to move your vehicle or add time to the meter.

4. Use Alternative Transportation: When possible, consider using public transportation, carpooling, or ride-sharing services to avoid parking challenges altogether.

What to Do If You Receive a Parking Ticket

If you receive a parking ticket from a photo enforcement system, here are the steps you can take:

1. Review the Ticket: Check the ticket for accuracy. Ensure that the details, such as the date, time, and location of the violation, are correct.

2. Examine the Evidence: Most tickets issued through photo enforcement will include images of your vehicle. Review these images to confirm whether the violation occurred.

3. Consider Contesting the Ticket: If you believe the ticket was issued in error, you can contest it. Follow your city’s procedure for appealing a parking ticket, which may involve providing evidence or attending a hearing.

4. Pay the Fine: If you decide not to contest the ticket, make sure to pay the fine promptly to avoid late fees or additional penalties.

Conclusion

Parking ticket photo enforcement is an effective tool for municipalities to manage parking regulations and enhance compliance. While it offers benefits like increased efficiency and reduced human error, it also raises questions about fairness and privacy. By understanding how these systems work and taking proactive steps, drivers can minimize their chances of receiving a parking ticket and navigate city streets more confidently. Always stay informed about local parking regulations and pay attention to signage to ensure a hassle-free parking experience.

Cities Trying To Use Photo Ticketing For Parking

Drivers be warned: In the perpetual cat-and-mouse war between parking enforcement and motorists trying to park without getting a ticket in this city, the cat just got a powerful new weapon. The city of Newton, a suburb of Boston, is installing video cameras that can detect when a car has been parked in a metered spot too long. According to a story in The Boston Globe, the devices alert parking enforcement officers if a ticket needs to be written.

Automatic license plate recognition — a kind of RoboCop of the parking world that uses a panoramic video camera, laptop computer, and sophisticated software — detects cars that have been parked too long and sounds an alert to write a ticket.

The city bought three systems for $50,000 and plans to install them in parking enforcement vehicles this month. Officials believe the technology could double the number of parking tickets the city writes each year and sharply increase the $1.8 million in annual parking fees it collects.  

Related posts:
Photo Enforced Parking Tickets Are Coming
Parking Ticket for Street Sweeping

Red-Light Cameras Collect Over $1.8 Billion from Illinois Drivers Since 2008

Recent analysis reveals that red-light cameras in Illinois have accumulated more than $1.8 billion in fines from drivers since 2008, underscoring ongoing concerns regarding the impact and effectiveness of these enforcement measures on motorists.

Map of Rochester, New York Red Light Cameras Removed

Map of red light cameras removed in Rochester, NY

Rochester, New York, has removed a red-light camera program. The program aims to improve traffic safety by deterring red-light violations and reducing the number of accidents at intersections. Up to 50 intersections in Rochester, New York have been turned off.

Under the program, cameras were installed at selected intersections throughout the city. These cameras were capable of capturing images and videos of vehicles that run red lights. When a violation occurs, the recorded evidence is reviewed by law enforcement officials to determine if a citation should be issued.

 

List of 20 Red Light Camera System Manufacturers

There are several manufacturers of red light camera systems. Here are some notable companies in the field:

Redflex: Redflex is one of the leading providers of red light camera systems worldwide. They offer a range of solutions, including intersection enforcement cameras, speed enforcement cameras, and back-office software for managing the captured data.

American Traffic Solutions (ATS now Verra Mobility): ATS is another prominent manufacturer of red light camera systems. They specialize in advanced traffic enforcement technologies, including red light and speed enforcement cameras, as well as software solutions for data management and reporting.

Jenoptik: Jenoptik is a global technology group that provides various solutions for traffic enforcement, including red light camera systems. They offer state-of-the-art camera technology for reliable monitoring and enforcement at intersections.

Verra Mobility: Verra Mobility is a leading provider of traffic safety and enforcement solutions. They offer red light and speed camera systems, as well as integrated software platforms for managing the captured data and generating violation notices.

Sensys Gatso Group: Sensys Gatso is a company that specializes in traffic enforcement technologies. They provide red light camera systems, speed enforcement solutions, and other traffic safety equipment, along with software for data analysis and enforcement management.

Swarco: Swarco is a multinational company that offers a wide range of traffic management and control solutions. They provide red light camera systems, traffic signal control systems, and other related technologies.

Other examples of manufacturers in the field of red light camera systems:  

Optotraffic

Iteris

Traffic Technology Services (TTS)

Gatso USA

Traffic Logix

PIPS Technology (a subsidiary of Federal Signal Corporation)

WatchGuard Video

Miovision

TrafficVision (a subsidiary of Iteris)

Peek Traffic (acquired by Image Sensing Systems)

Comarco Products

TrafficLand

Applied Information

 

Please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and there may be other regional or local manufacturers that provide red light camera systems as well. 

Verra Mobility Buys Rival Redflex

The two largest operators of red light cameras and speed cameras are merging. Verra Mobility (formerly American Traffic Solutions or ATS) told investors on Wednesday that it would buy the Australian-based Redflex Traffic Systems for A$146.1 million (US $112.7 million).

"We are delighted at the prospect of welcoming the Redflex team and their customers to the Verra Mobility family," Verra Mobility CEO David Roberts said in a statement about the deal.

Despite its significant share of the photo enforcement market, Redflex stock was depressed by its inability to turn a profit since it was caught in a massive bribery scandal in 2014. Top Redflex executives handed envelopes filled with cash, made large campaign donations and gave other "lavish gifts" to politicians in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Tennessee, Virginia and Washington in return for their endorsement of automated ticketing. A Federal Bureau of Investigation sting operation secured felony convictions for Karen Finley, the head of US operations and a board member of the Australian parent company, for corruption in Chicago, Illinois, and Ohio. More than twenty politicians, photo enforcement executives and public officials have been jailed in similar schemes (view a complete list).

This is not the first time that Redflex and Verra Mobility's predecessor company, ATS, have merged. Redflex formed in 1995 as a communications technology provider for the Australian military, but it soon found that operating automated ticketing machines on behalf of local governments was a more profitable line of business. Redflex undercut rivals with lower prices by, among other things, cutting corners on obtaining regulatory approvals and licenses. By 1999, Redflex was strong enough to buy out ATS (then known as American Traffic Systems) for $1.8 million.

Once their non-compete agreement expired in 2002, the original founders of ATS, Jim and Adam Tuton, created American Traffic Solutions. The Tutons built the company into the largest photo radar and red light camera operator in the United States, often clashing in nasty courtroom battles with its rival Redflex.

"ATS unleashed a crusade against Redflex, its biggest competitor in the photo traffic enforcement industry, to damage it," a Redflex lawyer said at the time.

In 2017, the Tutons cashed out their ownership stake and sold ATS to Platinum Equity, a merger and acquisition firm. The equity firm created Verra Mobility, whose latest purchase proposal requires the approval of Redflex shareholders and government regulators. The company expects the transaction to be completed by May.

How Do You Know If a Red Light Camera A Photo

  

The flash of a red light camera is one of the most dreaded things you can see when you pass an intersection. You may have noticed that if you have been caught red-handed running a stoplight because the camera flash will go off at the intersection.  If you don't see flash chances are you did not run the red light.       

Red-light cameras have a flash that goes off during the daytime or night when a violation is detected to enhance the license plate on the rear of the vehicle.  The camera flash is very bright even during the day.  Some drivers running red lights at night have experienced that these flashes are very startling and you will very easily notice them.  

The flashes can be seen at the front and the rear of the vehicle as the cameras are located on the side of the road.  If you see a flash coming from the traffic light it is most likely not a red light camera.  

The police officer or prosecutor reviewing your photo enforced ticket must be able to provide sufficient evidence to prove that it was you driving the vehicle and the camera was working correctly at the time of recording. 

How long does it take to receive a red light camera ticket in the mail? 

Red light camera ticket, not me driving?

Red light camera or traffic light? 

How Red Light Tickets and Speeding Camera Tickets Affect Insurance?

Snitch Tickets

Don't tattle on a friend or a family member for driving your 

What if you receive a red light camera ticket, and the driver wasn't you?

Red light camera tickets cost about $500 per ticket in California and a point on your license. Since the tickets add a point to your license, the police must obtain the name of the actual driver before they can file the ticket at court. Since the photo of the license plate will only lead to the registered owner ("RO"), and often he/she is not the person driving the car. The police will go to great lengths to get registered owners to identify who was driving the car that was ticketed. Technicians reviewing the photos will check to see if the pictured driver is obviously not the registered owner (male/female mismatch, age difference, or a rental car). Sometimes the photo is too blurry to identify who it is and will send the registered owner an official-looking notice telling him that he must identify the driver. About 40 California police departments will mail out Snitch Tickets to fool the registered owner into identifying the actual driver of the car.

 Are Traffic Cameras Legal In Los Angeles, California?

Snitch Tickets have not been filed with the court, so are recognizable because they don't say "Notice to Appear," don't have the court's address, and say (on the back, in small letters), "Do not contact the court." Since they have NOT been filed with the court, they have no legal weight. You can ignore a Snitch Ticket. Snitch Tickets are designed to look like a real ticket but are legally very different. Real tickets and Snitch Tickets both ask the registered owner to turn in or identify the person who was driving the car. Despite all that, there are some differences that you can rely on. One of the best ways to identify a Snitch Ticket is the small print on the back of the page, "Do not contact the court about this notice." Snitch Tickets will also lack any wording directing you to contact or "Respond to" the court. In fact, on a typical Snitch Ticket, there is no phone number for the court, and the court's address is usually missing or incomplete. (Please note, however, that in some towns the real tickets carry an incomplete address.

A real ticket will ask you to contact ("Respond to") the court and you should. If your ticket says this it's likely a real one and you should look it up on the court's website. If it's not on their site, it still could be real. Make sure you are looking on the court's website, not the website of the camera operator Redflex (PhotoNotice) or ATS's. Your ticket is real if you have received a Courtesy Notice and it asks you to contact the court. Please note that your ticket could be real even if the court's phone number is missing and its address is incomplete. This is often the case because some cities are leaving this information off their real tickets to make it harder for defendants to fight their tickets in court.

Read more about how to do a trial by written declaration. 

Cameras May Enforce Texting While Driving

The city of Scottsdale, Arizona may take it a step further and is considering using its photo enforced cameras to enforce distracted driver laws. Photo enforcement cameras in Scottsdale are capable of detecting behavior such as text messaging or other “distracted driving” behavior, in addition to capturing speeders and red-light runners. But whether Scottsdale pursues such enforcement as part of a proposed text-messaging and distracted driving law remains to be seen. “We’re able to see people clearly on their cell phones,” said Josh Weiss, spokesman for American Traffic Solutions, the company that operates the fixed cameras and camera-equipped vans on Scottsdale surface streets.

On September 24th, 2008 the Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 28 (SB 28) into law. The new bill “Prohibits a person from driving a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication." The new bill will impose a fine of $20 for the first offense and $50 for subsequent offenses starting January 1, 2009. No violation points will be given as a result of the offense and there are exceptions for emergency personnel.

The bill requires motorists to use hands-free devices while talking on a mobile phone when driving a motor vehicle. California motorists using cell phones have been required to use hands-free devices since July, and drivers under age 18 can't use any electronic devices. Seven other states and the District of Columbia ban text-messaging or the use of hand-held phones while driving, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

How Red light Cameras Work?

How To Tell If You Ran a Red Light Camera?

Red light cameras are designed to take photos of vehicles that enter a specific intersection after the traffic light has turned red.  If you enter the intersection before the light turns red, you are probably safe.  Entering the intersection means that your front tires are across the white line while the line is yellow and turning red.  If you cross the white line while the light is red that would trigger a flash and a violation. 

How Do Cameras Work?



If you’re turning right at a red light, you could trigger the camera if you don’t stop and take the time to look both ways before moving into the intersection. Red light cameras are either mounted on a free-standing pole near the intersection and are rarely attached directly to the traffic light stand. When the light is red, sensors that are embedded under each lane of traffic trigger the camera when a vehicle drives over the stop line. Then, the camera snaps a photo of the vehicle’s rear license plate.

How Long Does It Take to Receive a Ticket? 

Once the camera takes a photo of your license plate and driver, the picture is reviewed by a trained officer who makes sure you were actually running the red light. Within about a 5-7 business days, a ticket (ranging from $50 $500) is sent to the address listed on the vehicle’s registration.

Is This a Red Light Camera?

Many drivers mistake red light cameras for traffic cameras.  Read our blog post and see our red light cameras map for the type of camera at an intersection.

What is the proper length of a yellow light at traffic camera intersections?

The standard length is from 3-4.3 seconds depending on the speed limit at the intersection.  Read the article above for more details. 

What do red light cameras look like?

Red Light Camera vs Traffic Camera

What Do Red Light Cameras Look Like?

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera compared to a traffic light camera

What do red light cameras look like?

Red Light Camera Tickets Are Going Unpaid

Some people may choose not to pay the fines for various reasons, such as disagreement with the program, financial constraints, or other personal factors. Unpaid red light camera tickets can have consequences depending on local laws and enforcement practices. In some jurisdictions, unpaid tickets may lead to additional fines, late payment penalties, or other legal actions such as vehicle registration holds or potential impacts on credit scores. However, the specific consequences can vary by jurisdiction, so it is advisable to consult the traffic laws and regulations in your specific area to understand the implications of unpaid red-light camera tickets.

A growing percentage of drivers caught by red-light cameras around town aren't paying for their tickets. But beyond sending their names to a collection agency, there's little the city of Columbus can do to collect that money.   Nearly $1.6 million in Columbus, Missouri much of which would go to the city's public safety department. The department has used these fines to pay for new police cruisers and the city's summer-crime strike force.

Last year, 28 percent of all red-light-camera citations issued by Columbus were sent to a collection agency, up from 12 percent in 2007. Part of any funds collected now would go to the collection agency and Redflex, which operates the cameras for the city. The poor economy might be one reason why drivers aren't paying, said Deputy Public Safety Director George Speaks. A $95 ticket is a big hit.  But once your ticket is sent to a collection agency, the fine grows to $120. If you don't pay, the city will send you a notice. After 90 days, your case is sent to Capital Recovery, a collection agency. Running a red light is a civil infraction that doesn't add points to your license.

Capital Recovery collects about 17 percent of the delinquent violations the city sends its way, said Craig Klein, the company's president. He said the national collection rate in civil cases such as these is less than 10 percent. "The only way to attack it is to file lawsuits," Klein said. But that would likely cost the city more than it's worth, said City Attorney Richard C. Pfeiffer. If the problem grows, he'll consider it. Speaks said city officials are discussing reporting scofflaws to credit agencies.

Stephanie Palmer, a victims advocate in Pfeiffer's office, has three unpaid tickets. Two offenses were captured by the camera at Livingston and Fairwood Avenues. The tickets say Palmer didn't stop completely before turning on red. "I'm not sure if I didn't come to a complete stop," she said. "Usually I'm pretty good." In all, there are 169 individuals, companies, and agencies with three or more outstanding citations, totaling close to 900 unpaid tickets.

The biggest offender is the holding company for Avis and Budget rental cars. That company is responsible for 144 unpaid tickets. University Area Commissioner Ahmed Ebady has five unpaid tickets. He said contractors who maintain his residential properties and drive vehicles registered in his name must be responsible. "If the city is going to come after me for a moving violation, let them come up with proof who was driving," Ebady said.

Speaks said the cameras reduce crashes. He said right-angle crashes have fallen by 73 percent at the 18 intersections where cameras have been installed. "The system works," he said.