Search For Maps & Articles

Showing posts with label rolling right turns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rolling right turns. Show all posts

Right on Red Photo Enforced Tickets vs. Running a Red Light Ticket: What’s the Difference?

Right on Red Sign 

Traffic cameras are now a common feature in many U.S. cities, and two of the most debated violations they enforce are right-on-red tickets and red light running tickets. At first glance, they may seem similar, but legally and financially, they are treated very differently. Drivers often wonder why one carries a heavier fine or why some cities issue more of one type of ticket than the other. Understanding the distinctions can help drivers avoid fines and shed light on how municipalities collect revenue.

What Is a Right-on-Red Photo Enforced Ticket?

When a driver makes a right turn at a red light without a complete stop, a photo enforcement system may capture the violation. These tickets are typically issued when:

  • The vehicle does not stop before the crosswalk.

  • The turn is made despite a posted “No Turn on Red” sign.

  • The turn endangers pedestrians or cyclists.

Typical Penalties:

What Is a Running a Red Light Ticket?

A red light running violation occurs when a driver enters an intersection after the signal has turned red. Unlike right-on-red tickets, this is seen as a more dangerous infraction because it often leads to serious accidents.

Typical Penalties:

Revenue Differences

Cities make far more money from right-on-red violations simply because they are more frequent and easier to capture with cameras. However, red light running tickets, while less common, usually generate higher fines per ticket.

Comparison Table: Top 10 U.S. Cities with Camera Enforcement

City/State Right-on-Red Fine Red Light Running Fine License Points Insurance Impact Revenue Notes
Washington, D.C. $100 $150+ Yes (red light), often civil for right-on-red Yes, for moving Over 60% of camera tickets are right-on-red
Chicago, IL $100 $100 Treated as moving May impact insurance $50M+ annually from red light cameras
New York City, NY Rare (most intersections ban right-on-red) $50 Yes (moving) Minimal at $50 Focused on safety, low fines
Los Angeles, CA (ended in 2011) $159 base ($500 w/ fees) $159 base ($500 w/ fees) Yes Yes Ended program after public backlash
Phoenix, AZ $90 $250 Yes for both Red light strongly impacts Cameras operated by contractors like Redflex
Miami, FL $75 $158 Right-on-red: civil, no points; red light: moving Yes, for red light Highly controversial over fairness
Houston, TX (ended in 2010) $75 $75–$200 Yes Yes Program repealed by voter referendum
Philadelphia, PA $100 $100 Yes Yes Over $100M collected since program began
Seattle, WA $124 $136 Civil infraction, no points No insurance impact Revenue earmarked for traffic safety programs
San Francisco, CA $100+ (varies w/ fees) $500+ Yes Yes Among highest fines in the country for red light running

Safety vs. Revenue Debate

Critics argue that right-on-red tickets are more about money than safety, since the majority do not involve collisions. On the other hand, red light running tickets clearly address a dangerous behavior tied to serious crashes. Cities face pressure to balance safety goals with budget needs, which is why enforcement priorities differ.

Conclusion

While both right-on-red and red light running tickets come from camera enforcement, they differ in seriousness, penalties, and revenue generation. Right-on-red tickets tend to be lower in fines but more frequent, generating steady income for cities. Red light running tickets are harsher, more dangerous, and can have lasting impacts on driving records and insurance.

For drivers, the best approach is simple: always come to a complete stop, obey signage, and be cautious at intersections. For cities, the challenge remains ensuring that enforcement prioritizes safety over profit.

Received a Ticket But Weren’t the Driver? Here’s What to Do Next

Monkey driving car

Getting a traffic ticket in the mail when you weren’t even behind the wheel can feel unfair and frustrating. With the rise of speed cameras, red-light cameras, and automated license plate readers, more people are receiving citations even if someone else was driving their car. Whether you loaned your car to a friend, family member, or coworker—or your plates were cloned—the good news is you do have options. This guide walks you through what to do if you received a ticket but weren’t the driver.

Why You Might Receive a Ticket When You Weren’t Driving

Several situations can lead to a ticket showing up in your name:

  • Automated cameras: Tickets are issued based on license plate, not who was driving.

  • Borrowed vehicle: You lent your car to someone else, and they committed the violation.

  • Rental car mix-ups: Rental companies may forward violations to the renter, even if they weren’t driving at the time.

  • Stolen plates or vehicles: Sometimes plates are duplicated or vehicles are stolen and later linked to infractions.

  • Clerical errors: Mistakes in processing may wrongly assign a violation to your car.

Understanding why you got the ticket is the first step to handling it.

Step 1: Review the Ticket Carefully

Before panicking, read the citation in full. Look for:

If it’s a camera ticket, there’s usually a photo or video link showing the driver and vehicle. Sometimes you can clearly see it’s not you driving.

Step 2: Determine Responsibility

Ask yourself:

  • Was I driving at that time? If not, who was?

  • Did I loan my car out? If yes, document who had it.

  • Could my plate be cloned? Look for differences in the vehicle shown (color, make, stickers).

If you weren’t responsible, begin gathering proof.

Step 3: Gather Evidence

The stronger your evidence, the better your chance of contesting the ticket. Helpful evidence includes:

  • Proof of not being present (work records, receipts, GPS logs, travel confirmations).

  • Statement from the actual driver (if a friend or family borrowed your car).

  • Police report (if your car or plates were stolen).

  • Visual mismatch evidence (if the ticket photo shows a car that doesn’t match yours exactly).

Step 4: Research Local Laws

Traffic enforcement laws vary by state and city. Some areas hold the registered owner liable no matter what, while others allow you to transfer responsibility to the actual driver. For example:

Step 5: Contest the Ticket

If you weren’t the driver, don’t just pay the fine. Most jurisdictions allow you to:

  1. Request a hearing (online, by mail, or in court).

  2. Submit an affidavit declaring you were not the driver.

  3. Provide supporting documentation (photos, statements, reports).

If successful, the ticket can be dismissed or reassigned.

Step 6: Protect Yourself From Future Issues

To prevent this from happening again:

  • Be cautious when loaning your car—you’re often held responsible.

  • Document usage when others borrow your vehicle.

  • Report stolen plates immediately to DMV and law enforcement.

  • Check your driving record regularly to catch errors quickly.

Common Scenarios and Solutions

Situation Recommended Action
Friend/family borrowed car Submit affidavit naming driver; provide their statement.
Rental car violation Contact rental company with proof you weren’t the renter at the time.
Cloned/stolen plates File police report, request dismissal with supporting evidence.
Clerical mistake Show mismatched vehicle details, request correction.

Final Thoughts

Receiving a ticket for a violation you didn’t commit can be stressful, but you aren’t powerless. The key is acting quickly, reviewing the evidence, and providing documentation to prove your case. In many jurisdictions, especially with camera enforcement, the system assumes the vehicle owner is guilty until proven otherwise. By taking the right steps, you can protect your driving record, finances, and peace of mind.

Illegal Right Turns: Laws, Risks & Consequences Explained

no right on red

Summary: Right turns feel simple, but the rules aren’t. This guide explains when a right turn becomes illegal, how enforcement works (including red light cameras), penalties, and practical tips to avoid citations and crashes.

What Counts as an Illegal Right Turn?

An illegal right turn happens any time you turn in conflict with a traffic control device, state law, or safe-yield rules. The most common situations include:

  • Right on red where prohibited. A posted No Turn on Red sign makes the turn illegal at all times unless the sign lists specific hours.
  • Failing to stop before turning on red. A complete stop is required in most states; “rolling” through is widely cited.
  • Turning on a red arrow. A red right-turn arrow is a specific prohibition, even if other lanes have a green.
  • Wrong-lane turns. Turning from a center or left lane (or a bus/right-turn-only lane) without signage allowing it.
  • Turning into the wrong lane. Most laws require turning into the nearest legal lane first, then merging when safe.
  • Failure to yield to pedestrians & cyclists. Crosswalk users with a walk signal and cyclists in the bike lane have priority.

State & City Differences You Should Know

Right-turn rules are similar nationwide, but local exceptions matter:

Examples

  • California: Right on red permitted after a full stop unless posted otherwise; extra caution in school zones.
  • New York City: Generally no right on red unless a sign explicitly permits it.
  • Florida & Texas: Allowed unless posted; must stop and yield to pedestrians/bikes.
  • Downtown cores: Many cities restrict right on red at high-conflict crosswalks or near transit/bike facilities.

Watch for These Signs

  • NO TURN ON RED (sometimes with hours)
  • RIGHT TURN SIGNAL (turn only on green arrow)
  • RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT (lane control)
  • BIKES MAY USE FULL LANE / protected bike lanes with physical barriers

If the signage seems inconsistent, follow the most restrictive control to stay safe and legal.

How Illegal Right Turns Are Enforced

1) Police Traffic Stops

Officers monitor busy intersections, school zones, work zones, and areas with heavy foot traffic. Common citations include rolling stops, turning during a red arrow, and failing to yield to pedestrians.

2) Red Light Cameras

Automated systems capture vehicles that cross the stop line during a red and then turn without stopping. Evidence typically includes still photos, video clips, lane position, and timestamps. Many programs flag “no stop” right-on-red violations specifically.

3) School Zone & Safety Corridors

Some jurisdictions add time-limited restrictions near schools or high-crash corridors. Expect stricter enforcement during posted hours and around protected bike lanes.

Common Penalties for Illegal Right Turns

Exact penalties vary by state and city, but drivers often face a combination of fines, points, and insurance impacts. School zones or red-arrow violations can carry higher fines.

Penalty Type What to Expect (Typical Range)
Base fine $50–$300 depending on jurisdiction; enhanced amounts in school/construction zones.
License points Often 2–3 points; may trigger administrative fees or corrective courses.
Court/administrative costs Added fees can exceed the fine itself in some areas.
Traffic school Sometimes offered to reduce points; availability varies.
Insurance impact Premiums may rise for 1–3 years depending on your insurer and record.

Common Misconceptions About Right Turns

Myth 1: “If it looks safe, I can always turn right on red.”
Reality: Not when signs prohibit it, a red arrow is displayed, or pedestrians/cyclists have the right of way.

Myth 2: “A rolling stop is fine if nobody’s around.”
Reality: Most laws require a full stop. Cameras routinely issue citations when wheels never fully stop.

Myth 3: “No Turn on Red is only for rush hour.”
Reality: Unless times are printed, the restriction is 24/7.

Myth 4: “I can turn from the bike lane if it’s empty.”
Reality: Using a bike lane as a turn lane is often illegal unless specifically marked.

Why Illegal Right Turns Are Dangerous

  • Pedestrian conflicts: Many crashes happen when drivers look left for traffic but miss pedestrians crossing from the right.
  • Right hooks with cyclists: Turning across a bike lane can cut off people on bikes who have a green or are traveling straight.
  • Visibility limits: Parked vehicles, large trucks, or construction barriers create blind spots that signage is meant to mitigate.
  • Intersection chaos: Wrong-lane turns and rolling stops reduce predictability and increase multi-vehicle conflicts.

How to Avoid Illegal Right-Turn Tickets (and Crashes)

  1. Scan for signage early. Look above, beside, and sometimes before the intersection for “No Turn on Red” or red-arrow signals.
  2. Come to a complete stop. Pause long enough to check crosswalks, bike lanes, and oncoming traffic—then turn when clear.
  3. Yield like your record depends on it. It does. Pedestrians with a walk signal and cyclists proceeding straight have priority.
  4. Use the correct lane. Start from the rightmost legal lane and turn into the nearest legal lane.
  5. Be extra cautious in school zones. Time-specific restrictions and higher fines are common.
  6. Follow the most restrictive control. If signage and signals feel contradictory, the strictest rule keeps you compliant.
  7. Maintain your brakes & tires. Good stopping power reduces the temptation to “roll” through reds.

Quick FAQ

Is right on red always legal?

No. It depends on state law and local signage. A red right-turn arrow or “No Turn on Red” sign makes it illegal, period.

Do I have to stop before turning on red?

Yes, in most states a complete stop is required before you turn right on red.

What if I turned from the middle lane?

Turning from the wrong lane is a separate violation. Expect a citation even if you stopped first.

Can cameras ticket rolling right turns?

Yes. Many systems detect when a vehicle fails to fully stop before a right on red and issue citations.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Traffic laws vary by state and city. Always check your local vehicle code and posted signs.

Red Light Cameras are Cash Cows

cash cow

Safety Tool or Municipal Cash Cow?

Red light cameras remain one of the most divisive traffic enforcement tools in the United States. Cities praise them as lifesaving deterrents, while drivers often view them as sneaky cash machines. Billions of dollars have been collected since their introduction, and the question remains: are these cameras about safety or revenue?

Why Red Light Cameras Were Introduced

The technology arrived in U.S. cities in the 1990s. Its promise was straightforward:

  • Automatically catch drivers running red lights.

  • Free up police resources.

  • Reduce deadly right-angle collisions at intersections.

On paper, it sounded like a win-win. But as citations piled up, public skepticism grew, especially when people noticed how much money cities were making from the fines.

The Safety Debate

Studies consistently show red light cameras reduce dangerous T-bone crashes, which often cause severe injuries and fatalities. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) found that cities using cameras see fewer fatal crashes caused by red-light running (IIHS).

Yet the trade-off is an increase in rear-end collisions. Drivers slam on the brakes to avoid a ticket, leading to chain-reaction crashes. These tend to be less severe, but they still raise insurance costs and public frustration.

So while cameras may improve safety in one way, they also create new risks. Whether they’re worth it depends on how cities manage them.

The Revenue Engine

While safety is the selling point, revenue is the reality. Many programs generate tens of millions annually. In some places, city budgets even factor in camera fines as a steady funding stream.

  • In Chicago, red light cameras generated $56.5 million between June 2024 and May 2025.

  • In New York City, the program is projected to raise $38 million in FY 2025.

  • Smaller municipalities like Hallandale, Florida projected $1.2 million from just one intersection.

When local governments lean heavily on these fines, critics argue the programs become more about profit than protection.

Contracts and Conflicts of Interest

Adding fuel to the fire are the private vendors who run the systems. In many cities, companies are paid a percentage of each ticket, creating a direct incentive to maximize citations.

That setup raises uncomfortable questions:

  • Are cameras calibrated for safety, or to catch as many drivers as possible?

  • Could short yellow lights or tricky intersections be exploited to drive up revenue?

The potential conflict of interest is a major reason why so many drivers see cameras as a cash cow rather than a safety measure.

Legal and Ethical Issues

Several issues keep sparking public outrage:

  • Due process: Tickets go to the vehicle owner, not necessarily the driver.

  • Accuracy: Malfunctions and unclear photos lead to wrongful citations.

  • Equity: Flat fines disproportionately punish low-income drivers.

  • Transparency: Many cities don’t release calibration data or dismissal rates.

This lack of oversight fuels distrust, leading some states and cities to ban or scale back their programs.

Where the Money Flows Today (2023–2025)

Fresh reporting shows that automated camera revenue remains massive in major metros. Washington, DC, pulled in more than $113 million in 2022 from its automated enforcement network. Chicago’s red light cameras alone produced $56.5 million in 2025. And in New York City, projections show $38 million in fines tied to red light cameras in FY 2025.

Counties and suburbs also rake in millions. For example, Suffolk County, NY, collected nearly $18.7 million in 2023, while Philadelphia redirected almost $14.8 million to state safety grants in FY 2023. Even mid-sized cities like Orlando and Miami report seven-figure totals.

Top 10 Cities by Red-Light (and Automated) Camera Revenue

Rank City / Jurisdiction Year/Window Revenue (USD) Scope
1 Washington, DC 2022 $113,000,000 All automated enforcement (incl. red-light)
2 Chicago, IL Jun 2024–May 2025 $56,500,000 Red-light only
3 New York City, NY FY 2025 (est.) $38,000,000 Red-light only
4 Baltimore, MD FY 2023 $30,400,000 Automated enforcement (speed + red-light)
5 New Orleans, LA 2023 $19,600,000 Automated enforcement
6 Suffolk County, NY 2023 $18,729,267 Red-light only
7 Philadelphia, PA FY 2023 $14,791,780 Red-light only
8 Orlando, FL Jul 2023–Jun 2024 $6,891,599 Red-light only
9 Orange Park, FL 2023 ~$2,160,000 Red-light only
10 Miami, FL FY 2024 proj. ~$2,000,000 Red-light only

Alternatives to Cameras

Critics argue that safer and fairer options exist:

  1. Lengthen yellow lights: Even one extra second can reduce violations by more than a third.

  2. Improve design: Add turn lanes, better signage, and longer all-red intervals.

  3. Targeted police enforcement: Human judgment can distinguish between reckless driving and honest mistakes.

  4. Public education campaigns: Raising awareness about the risks of running red lights.

These measures may not generate revenue, but they directly improve safety.

Public Opinion and Political Pushback

Public sentiment has shifted against red light cameras. In Houston, voters ended the city’s program. Several other states have banned automated enforcement outright.

As more drivers share stories of unfair tickets, and as media investigations uncover budgetary dependence, pressure grows on lawmakers to rethink these programs. Some cities are now required to earmark revenue for road safety projects, while others are phasing out contracts entirely.

Best Practices for Fair Use

If red light cameras are to survive, reforms are essential:

  • Vendors should be paid flat fees, not per-ticket commissions.

  • All revenue should be reinvested into road safety projects.

  • Cities must publish annual reports with calibration logs and appeal statistics.

  • Intersections should be engineered for safety before cameras are installed.

  • Programs should expire unless renewed by proven results.

Without these safeguards, public trust will continue to erode.

Conclusion: More Than Meets the Eye

Red light cameras do reduce dangerous crashes, but they also generate enormous revenue. For cities like Chicago, Washington, and New York, tens of millions of dollars flow in each year. For smaller towns, even a single intersection can bring in millions.

The balance between safety and profit is delicate. Done right, cameras can deter reckless driving and save lives. Done wrong, they become little more than municipal cash cows with a side effect of resentment. The real question isn’t whether cameras work—it’s whether cities use them responsibly.

Did You Get a Photo Enforced Ticket? I Saw A Flash

i saw a flash, did I get a ticket

Four of the most common questions I receive from visitors are the following with regards to “I saw a flash, did I get a photo enforced ticket?”  

Seeing a sudden flash while driving can be unnerving. Many drivers immediately worry: “Did I just get a photo enforced ticket?” Modern traffic enforcement technology makes it hard to know in the moment. However, most flashes do not lead to citations. Understanding how red-light and speed cameras operate can help drivers make sense of what they saw and whether to expect a ticket in the mail.

This article breaks down the most common scenarios, explains what a camera flash really means, how tickets are issued, and what steps drivers can take if they believe they were wrongly cited.

Common Questions Drivers Ask After Seeing a Flash

red light camera

1. I Saw a Flash When Making a Left Turn

Many drivers are startled when they see a flash during a left-hand turn at an intersection. Typically, a red-light violation occurs only if a vehicle enters the intersection after the light turns red. If you had already crossed the stop line before the signal changed, no violation occurred—even if the camera flashed. Some flashes are triggered by motion or mis-detection, but officers reviewing the footage will dismiss the case if you were legally in the intersection.

2. I Saw a Flash When Turning Right on Red

Right-on-red turns are another source of confusion. Most states allow right turns after a complete stop unless otherwise posted. If you stopped fully before making your turn, you are unlikely to receive a citation. However, if the video shows that you “rolled through” without stopping, that can trigger a legitimate ticket. Cameras record several frames, so the reviewing officer will check if your wheels came to a full stop.

3. I Was Stuck in the Middle of the Intersection

Sometimes traffic ahead stops suddenly, leaving you stranded in the intersection when the light changes. In most jurisdictions, this is not the same as running a red light. While being caught “blocking the box” may result in a separate fine in certain cities, it does not automatically trigger a red-light violation. Again, human reviewers decide whether to issue a ticket, and most dismiss cases where drivers were clearly trapped by traffic conditions.

4. I Stopped Over the Crosswalk Line

Stopping with your front bumper or wheels slightly past the white crosswalk line often sets off sensors, but it usually does not result in a violation. Enforcement systems are designed to penalize drivers who proceed through the intersection against the light, not those who stop a few feet beyond the designated line. Reviewers typically disregard these incidents unless the car continued fully through the red light.

How Long Does It Take to Get a Ticket?

If a violation is confirmed, the ticket is normally mailed within five business days to the registered vehicle owner. In some states, the timeframe may be a little longer, but in most cases, if you haven’t received anything within two weeks, you probably won’t. The mailed citation typically includes:

  • Photographs of the vehicle at the intersection

  • A link to view video footage online

  • The date, time, and location of the incident

  • Instructions for payment or contesting the ticket

Flash ≠ Automatic Ticket

One of the biggest misconceptions is that a flash guarantees a citation. In reality:

  • A flash from a traffic signal is not always from a red-light camera.

  • Speed camera flashes indicate speed was recorded, but a citation depends on thresholds (e.g., 10 mph over the limit).

  • Many cameras don’t flash at all. Municipalities often prefer non-flashing cameras to avoid alerting drivers in real time.

The flash is best thought of as an indicator, not confirmation. Officers must review and approve each potential violation before mailing tickets.

Why Some Cameras Flash and Others Don’t

Camera technology varies. Some older systems rely on visible flashes to capture clear images at night. Newer cameras use infrared technology, which is invisible to the human eye. Cities often choose non-flashing systems because drivers are less likely to contest or avoid them. This means that even if you didn’t see a flash, a violation may still have been recorded.

What Happens If You Receive a Ticket?

If you do receive a notice, you typically have three options:

  1. Pay the Fine – The simplest but costliest choice. Fines for red-light violations often range from $75 to $500 depending on the state.

  2. Contest in Court – Drivers can argue that the system malfunctioned, the driver wasn’t identifiable, or a legal exception applied (such as yielding to emergency vehicles).

  3. Request a Hearing by Mail or Online – Many cities allow appeals without requiring an in-person court appearance.

Legal experts note that a significant percentage of contested tickets are dismissed, especially in cases involving questionable identification or ambiguous footage.

Why Not Every Flash Results in a Ticket

There are several reasons why most flashes do not turn into violations:

  • Speed threshold requirements – Many systems won’t issue tickets unless the vehicle exceeds a set speed while crossing the stop line.

  • Human review process – Officers reject tickets when evidence is inconclusive.

  • Legal protections – Some states have strict rules requiring positive driver identification, which can be difficult from camera footage alone.

  • Technical errors – Glitches, sensor malfunctions, or weather conditions can cause false triggers that get thrown out during review.

The Rise of Speed Cameras

Beyond red-light enforcement, many cities are expanding speed camera programs. These cameras monitor specific corridors—often near schools or work zones—and are calibrated to issue tickets only when speeds exceed a certain threshold. A speed camera flash is more likely to result in a ticket than a red-light camera flash, but even here, an officer must confirm the evidence before mailing a citation.

Public Debate Over Photo Enforcement

Red-light and speed cameras remain controversial. Supporters argue they:

  • Improve safety by reducing T-bone crashes at intersections

  • Free up police resources for other priorities

  • Provide objective, photographic evidence

Critics counter that:

  • They act more as revenue generators than safety tools

  • Some systems are prone to errors or unfair targeting

  • Outsourcing enforcement to private vendors raises transparency concerns

This ongoing debate has led some cities to ban or restrict their use, while others expand programs to cover more intersections.

FAQs About Camera Flashes and Tickets

Q: Does every camera flash mean I broke the law?
A: No. Flashes can be triggered by multiple factors, and most do not result in citations.

Q: Can I get a ticket if the car was not mine?
A: Tickets are mailed to the registered owner, but if someone else was driving, many states allow you to submit an affidavit identifying the actual driver.

Q: Are tickets always mailed?
A: Yes. If a violation is confirmed, notices are mailed to the registered owner. Officers do not stop drivers on the spot in photo enforcement cases.

Q: What if I didn’t see a flash?
A: Many cameras don’t use visible flashes, so you may still receive a ticket even if you never saw one.

Q: Can I check online before I get a ticket?
A: Some municipalities provide portals where drivers can enter their plate number to check for pending violations, but this is not universal.

Final Thoughts

If you saw a flash at an intersection or along a roadway, don’t panic. Most flashes do not lead to citations. A ticket is only issued after evidence is carefully reviewed and confirmed. Knowing the common scenarios—left turns, right turns, blocked intersections, or stopping past the line—can provide peace of mind, since most are not violations. If a ticket does arrive, drivers have the right to contest it and often succeed in having it dismissed.

Understanding how photo enforcement works makes it easier to respond calmly when that sudden flash catches your eye.

Rolling Right Turn Stop Tickets in Culver City

Rolling Right Turn Tickets
Rolling Right Turns on Sepulveda and Green Valley

Drivers in Culver City, California are increasingly reporting expensive rolling right turn tickets, especially at the intersection of Sepulveda Boulevard and Green Valley Circle. This intersection has become a focal point for debate about fairness, safety, and revenue generation from automated traffic enforcement.

What makes these tickets controversial is the perception that there is no clear signage warning drivers that they must come to a complete stop before making a right turn on red. Many drivers believe they slowed down, checked for pedestrians, and safely continued, only to later receive a citation in the mail.

Why the Sepulveda and Green Valley Intersection is a Hot Spot

Culver City has long been one of the most aggressive municipalities in Southern California in enforcing red-light violations with cameras. The Sepulveda and Green Valley location is heavily trafficked because it feeds into retail areas, schools, and the 405 freeway.

The intersection is equipped with Redflex-operated red-light cameras, which automatically monitor vehicle movement. These cameras are particularly sensitive to rolling right turns, where drivers slow but fail to come to a full stop behind the white limit line before turning.

Local residents and commuters argue that the intersection feels more like a ticket trap than a legitimate safety measure. Unlike some areas where signs are posted to clarify right-turn stopping rules, Culver City has not consistently installed such notices, creating confusion for out-of-town drivers.

What Exactly is a Rolling Right Turn Ticket?

A rolling right turn ticket is issued when a driver:

  • Approaches a red light.

  • Slows down, but does not fully stop behind the stop bar.

  • Proceeds to turn right while the light remains red.

According to California Vehicle Code §21453, drivers must come to a complete stop at a red light before turning, unless otherwise posted. A “complete stop” means that all four wheels of the vehicle stop moving behind the line, even if the road is clear.

The cost of such a violation in Los Angeles County is around $500, once base fines and administrative fees are included. On top of that, the ticket adds a point to the driver’s DMV record, which can result in higher insurance premiums for years to come.

How the Red-Light Cameras Operate

The cameras use sensors embedded in the pavement to detect when a vehicle crosses into the intersection after the signal turns red. When triggered, they capture several still photographs and often a 12-second video clip of the incident.

These images are then reviewed by law enforcement staff before a citation is issued. The evidence typically shows:

  • The vehicle entering the intersection.

  • The driver behind the wheel.

  • The license plate.

In rolling right turn cases, the footage usually depicts the car crossing the line without fully stopping. Even if no pedestrians or cross traffic are present, the law does not allow exceptions for convenience.

The Debate: Safety vs. Revenue

The Safety Argument

Supporters argue that red-light cameras prevent pedestrian accidents. Culver City has many intersections near shopping centers, bus stops, and schools. Requiring all drivers to come to a full stop is believed to reduce risks for pedestrians crossing with a walk signal.

The Revenue Argument

Critics believe rolling right turn enforcement is primarily about money. Studies have shown that accidents from rolling right turns are rare compared to broadside crashes caused by running straight through red lights. Yet, Culver City continues to issue thousands of rolling tickets annually.

At $500 per citation, even a few thousand tickets generate millions of dollars. A portion of this revenue is shared with Redflex, creating concerns that financial motives outweigh safety priorities.

Do Signs Have to Be Posted?

The law requires drivers to stop at all red lights, regardless of signage. However, many cities install “Right Turn Must Stop” signs at camera-enforced intersections to remove ambiguity.

At Sepulveda and Green Valley, there is no such sign. Drivers argue this omission creates unfair conditions, especially for those unfamiliar with the intersection. Los Angeles has addressed similar concerns by posting clear stop requirements, while Culver City has not consistently followed suit.

Common Defenses to Rolling Right Turn Tickets

While these tickets are tough to fight, several defenses have been successfully argued:

  1. Necessity Defense – Stopping abruptly would have caused a rear-end collision.

  2. Obstructed View – Traffic lights, signs, or limit lines were blocked by construction or vegetation.

  3. Full Stop Evidence – The video actually shows the car fully stopped for a brief moment, even if subtle.

  4. Technical Error – Camera miscalibration or timing errors can lead to false triggers.

  5. Improper Documentation – Errors in how the ticket was processed can sometimes result in dismissal.

Many drivers hire traffic attorneys who specialize in photo enforcement tickets. Since the penalties are steep, a skilled lawyer may reduce or dismiss the charges by exploiting weaknesses in the evidence.

Public Sentiment in Culver City

Local forums and sites like PhotoEnforced.com are filled with heated debates. Some residents support strict enforcement, saying drivers in Los Angeles need constant reminders to prioritize pedestrian safety. Others feel Culver City is abusing the system for financial gain, particularly since the city partners with a private vendor.

How Much Revenue Do These Tickets Generate?

Each ticket costs around $500. If the city issues 10,000 rolling right turn tickets in a year, that’s $5 million in revenue. Typically, the vendor receives a cut—sometimes up to 40%—for maintaining the equipment.

This financial structure has drawn criticism nationwide. Opponents argue that public safety should never be tied to revenue-sharing agreements that incentivize ticket volume.

Comparison to Other Cities

  • Los Angeles: Has posted signs at many intersections requiring a full stop before right turns, reducing confusion.

  • San Diego: Removed its red-light cameras after concluding they were more about revenue than safety.

  • Chicago & Washington, D.C.: National leaders in red-light and speed camera enforcement, generating tens of millions annually but also facing intense backlash.

Culver City finds itself somewhere in the middle—continuing enforcement despite complaints, but not as aggressive as cities with hundreds of camera sites.

Practical Tips for Avoiding Tickets

  • Always come to a full stop behind the white line at a red light, even if no one is around.

  • Look carefully for pedestrians and bicycles before turning.

  • Be aware that slowing down without fully stopping will almost certainly trigger the camera.

  • If you receive a ticket, request the video evidence before making decisions about payment or contesting it.

FAQ: Rolling Right Turn Tickets

Q: How long does it take to receive a ticket in the mail?
A: Typically 7–14 business days after the violation.

Q: Can I ignore the ticket?
A: Ignoring it may lead to additional fines, DMV holds, or even collection actions.

Q: Will my insurance rates go up?
A: Yes, since the ticket adds a moving violation point to your record.

Q: Can I fight the ticket?
A: Yes, but success often depends on video review, legal representation, and the circumstances of the stop.

Q: Do pedestrians have to be present for the ticket to be valid?
A: No. The law requires a full stop at red regardless of whether the crosswalk is empty.

The Future of Rolling Right Turn Enforcement in Culver City

As public pressure builds, Culver City may eventually revisit its policies. Options include adding clearer signage, adjusting camera sensitivity, or phasing out rolling right enforcement altogether. Until then, drivers should assume strict enforcement will continue.

The safest strategy remains simple: when in doubt, stop completely at every red light before turning. It may feel unnecessary at times, but in Culver City, it could save you $500 and protect your driving record.

The State of Florida Seeks Share of City Revenue from Cameras

city red light camera revenue Florida

Florida cities have long used red light cameras as a tool to promote traffic safety and reduce violations at dangerous intersections. These cameras generate significant revenue for local governments, funding various public services. However, the State of Florida is increasingly interested in obtaining a portion of this income, raising questions about the impact on local budgets and public safety initiatives. Here’s a look at why the state wants a share of red light camera revenue, what it means for Florida cities, and how it could affect residents. 

Why Does Florida Want Red Light Camera Revenue?

How To Beat A Red Light Camera Ticket In Bad Weather Conditions?

photo enforced bad weather

Few things frustrate drivers more than getting a red light camera ticket — especially when the violation occurs during bad weather. Snow, ice, rain, or even fog can make intersections hazardous, sometimes forcing drivers into situations where stopping safely is nearly impossible. While law enforcement does not disable red light cameras during storms, the circumstances behind each ticket are reviewed. That review can determine whether a citation is upheld, dismissed, or successfully fought in court.

This guide explores what happens when you receive a red light camera ticket during poor weather conditions, how officers evaluate violations, the defenses that may be available, and practical steps you can take to build a strong case.

Do Red Light Cameras Work in Bad Weather?

Red light cameras operate year-round, regardless of weather conditions. These systems rely on sensors embedded in the road or radar/inductive loops to detect when a vehicle enters the intersection after the light turns red. The camera then captures photographs or video, typically including:

  • The license plate of the vehicle

  • The traffic signal showing red

  • A wider shot of the vehicle in the intersection

Weather like heavy rain or snow may blur the images, but modern systems are designed to compensate with high-intensity flashes and infrared technology. In short, the cameras keep running — and tickets can still be issued.

How Officers Review Violations

Contrary to what many drivers believe, tickets are not automatically issued by the camera. Instead, the captured images and video are reviewed by trained law enforcement or contracted personnel. Factors they consider include:

  • Did the driver clearly attempt to stop?

  • Was the vehicle sliding or skidding due to weather?

  • Did the violation appear intentional (accelerating through a red) or unavoidable (ice preventing a stop)?

This human review means that context matters. A driver who cautiously slowed but slid across the stop line may be judged differently than one who sped up through a red light.

Common Driver Complaints During Poor Weather

Emails and forum discussions often highlight similar stories:

  • Sliding on Ice: A driver braked early but hit a patch of black ice, sliding through the intersection.

  • Hydroplaning in Rain: Tires lost traction on standing water, forcing the vehicle forward.

  • Poor Visibility: Fog or blizzard conditions made it difficult to see the light until it was too late.

  • Stopping Unsafe: Attempting to stop would have risked being rear-ended by another vehicle unable to slow down in time.

These scenarios create the foundation for potential defenses.

The “Necessity Defense” Explained

One of the most effective arguments in bad weather cases is the necessity defense. This legal strategy acknowledges that while the driver technically violated the law, it was done to avoid a greater danger.

For example:

  • Stopping on ice would have caused the car to spin into cross-traffic.

  • Braking too hard in heavy rain risked hydroplaning into pedestrians.

  • Proceeding through the intersection was the safest choice available.

Courts have accepted necessity arguments when drivers can demonstrate they acted responsibly and prioritized safety over strict compliance.

Gathering Evidence to Support Your Case

Evidence is key when contesting a red light camera ticket. Drivers should:

  1. Return to the Scene Quickly: Take photos of road conditions, ice patches, snow accumulation, or large puddles.

  2. Document the Weather: Obtain official weather reports for the date and time of the ticket. These can show rainfall totals, temperature (below freezing), or storm warnings.

  3. Collect Witness Statements: Passengers or nearby drivers can confirm that conditions were unsafe.

  4. Review Camera Footage: In many jurisdictions, you can request to view the red light camera video. If it shows skidding or loss of control, it strengthens your defense.

  5. Bring Repair or Tire Records: Proof that your tires, brakes, or vehicle systems were in good condition helps counter claims of negligence.

How Courts View These Cases

Judges vary in their approach. Some take a hard stance, emphasizing that drivers must always maintain control regardless of weather. Others are more sympathetic, especially when the driver demonstrates they acted carefully and conditions were extraordinary.

Key considerations include:

  • Effort to Stop: Was the driver slowing down or clearly accelerating?

  • Road Conditions: Was ice widespread, or was it an isolated patch?

  • Public Safety: Did running the red prevent a worse outcome?

In general, presenting credible evidence and showing responsibility goes a long way toward a favorable outcome.

Practical Tips for Fighting the Ticket

If you decide to contest a red light camera ticket in bad weather:

  1. Request a Trial: Do not pay the fine immediately — ask for a court hearing.

  2. Prepare Documentation: Bring photos, weather reports, and any evidence of the dangerous conditions.

  3. Stay Professional: Courts respond better to calm, factual presentations rather than emotional pleas.

  4. Use the Necessity Argument: Frame your decision as the safer option under the circumstances.

  5. Consider Legal Help: In high-fine states like California, lawyers often specialize in fighting red light camera citations and may increase your chances of dismissal.

Preventing Red Light Camera Tickets in Bad Weather

While some situations are unavoidable, drivers can reduce risk by:

  • Maintaining Proper Tires: Good tread and winter tires improve stopping power.

  • Increasing Following Distance: Give more space in case of sudden stops.

  • Slowing Before Intersections: Begin decelerating earlier than usual in rain or snow.

  • Knowing Camera Locations: Awareness of high-risk intersections helps you approach with extra caution.

Real-World Examples

  • Chicago, IL: Drivers frequently complain about tickets issued during snowstorms. Courts sometimes dismiss cases when evidence shows untreated icy intersections.

  • Seattle, WA: Heavy rain leads to hydroplaning incidents. Some judges accept weather reports and video evidence as grounds for dismissal.

  • Boston, MA: Fog-related visibility issues have been raised in court, though outcomes vary depending on evidence quality.

FAQ: Red Light Camera Tickets in Bad Weather

Q: Do red light cameras shut off during storms?
No. They operate continuously regardless of rain, snow, or fog.

Q: If the photo is blurry because of bad weather, is the ticket valid?
Not always. Blurry or unreadable license plates may prevent officers from confirming a violation.

Q: Can I argue that sliding on ice was safer than stopping?
Yes. That forms the basis of the necessity defense, but you must provide evidence.

Q: Do officers really review every violation?
Yes. A trained reviewer or officer looks at each case before deciding whether to issue a ticket.

Q: Should I hire a lawyer?
For expensive fines or repeat violations, legal representation can improve your chances of dismissal.

Illinois Proposal: Trial by Phone Marks Court Shift

Trial by phone

In an effort to modernize the judicial system and enhance accessibility, Illinois legislators have introduced a groundbreaking proposal to allow trials to be conducted via phone. This innovative approach aims to streamline court processes, reduce backlogs, and improve the overall efficiency of the legal system. As courts adapt to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and embrace technological advancements, this legislation could set a precedent for other states. Here’s what you need to know about the proposed trial by phone legislation in Illinois.

The Need for Change in the Judicial System

The traditional court system has faced numerous challenges in recent years, including:

  1. Backlogs and Delays: Courts across Illinois have struggled with significant backlogs, leading to lengthy delays in legal proceedings. This has affected the timely resolution of cases and has often left defendants waiting months or even years for their day in court.

  2. Accessibility Issues: Many individuals, particularly those in rural areas or with mobility challenges, find it difficult to attend court hearings. Travel time, transportation costs, and other barriers can prevent people from accessing justice.

  3. Technological Advancements: The pandemic accelerated the adoption of technology in various sectors, including the legal field. Virtual court proceedings became a necessity, demonstrating that remote participation could be effective in many situations.

Key Features of the Proposed Legislation

The Illinois legislation proposing trial by phone includes several key features:

  1. Remote Participation: Defendants, attorneys, and witnesses would have the option to participate in court proceedings via phone. This would allow for greater flexibility and accessibility, particularly for those unable to attend in person.

  2. Limited to Certain Cases: The proposal is likely to focus on specific types of cases, such as minor traffic violations or low-level misdemeanors, where a phone trial could be appropriate without compromising the integrity of the judicial process.

  3. Procedural Safeguards: The legislation would include procedural safeguards to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. This may involve recording the proceedings, ensuring secure communication channels, and providing options for in-person hearings if necessary.

  4. Cost-Effectiveness: By reducing the need for in-person appearances, the legislation aims to cut down on court costs, transportation expenses, and lost work time for participants.

Potential Benefits of Trial by Phone

The proposed legislation offers several potential benefits:

  1. Increased Accessibility: By allowing trials to be conducted via phone, individuals who may have difficulty attending court in person can participate more easily, promoting fairness and inclusivity in the legal process.

  2. Reduced Backlogs: Remote trials could help alleviate court backlogs, enabling cases to be resolved more swiftly and efficiently. This would benefit not only defendants but also the judicial system as a whole.

  3. Flexibility for Legal Professionals: Attorneys and legal representatives would have greater flexibility in managing their schedules, allowing them to handle more cases effectively.

  4. Adaptability to Future Challenges: As society continues to adapt to technological advancements, implementing phone trials positions the Illinois judicial system to respond to future challenges, whether they be health-related or logistical.

Challenges and Considerations

While the proposal presents many advantages, there are also challenges to consider:

  1. Ensuring Fairness: Critics may raise concerns about ensuring fair trials and the ability to adequately present evidence over the phone. Safeguards will be necessary to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.

  2. Technical Issues: Reliance on technology means that courts must be prepared to address potential technical issues that could disrupt proceedings or affect communication.

  3. Public Perception: The perception of phone trials as a less formal or serious approach to justice may lead to resistance from some legal professionals or the public.

Conclusion

The proposed legislation in Illinois to allow trials by phone marks a significant step towards modernizing the judicial system and increasing accessibility. By leveraging technology, the state aims to address long-standing challenges in the legal process while ensuring that justice remains accessible to all. As the legislation progresses, it will be crucial for lawmakers, legal professionals, and the public to engage in discussions about its implications and to work together to create a system that serves the needs of all citizens effectively.

No Right Turn on Red Intersections Map

Locations of No Right Turn on Red Intersections

These intersections above monitor illegal right turns on red.  Some of these intersection also monitor rolling right turns.  If you want to find these intersections in your City type in "Right Turn" into the name field and zoom into your area.  Some of these intersections also monitor red light violations as well.  These cameras are colored in red.  No right turns on red only are colored in yellow.  

Rolling Right Turns in Florida


Rolling Right Turns in Florida

Cities and counties aren't just using short yellow lights to rack up millions of dollars in extra red light camera tickets in Florida; some are also using stricter-than-intended enforcement to issue rolling right tickets to drivers. While this summer's tweaks to red light camera (RLC) legislation were promoted as protection against overzealous ticket-writers, the language that affects right turns-on-red doesn't do very much. It says the officers that review RLC violations cannot issue a ticket if the driver came to a complete stop, regardless of where the driver stops in relation to the stop bar. But drivers who stopped a few feet over the stop bar weren't typically getting tickets anyway, because the Mark Wandall Act, which standardized the use of RLC across Florida in 2010, specifies officers should not ticket drivers who make rolling right turns in a "careful and prudent" manner.

Ticket for Illegal Right Turn

Illegal Right Turn & Rolling Right Tickets Defined
Illegal Right Turn & Rolling Right Tickets Defined

The difference between the two types of tickets is huge!   If you made a right-hand turn at a red light and were caught by a camera, chances are that the ticket you received in the mail states you violated CVC§21453(a) even though they could have (some argue should have) cited you for CVC§21453(b)For some cities, like Los Angeles, CA most of the revenue is generated by illegal right turns, in fact, an LA Times article from December last year reported that according to the Los Angeles Police Department, an estimated 8 in 10 photo tickets were issued for right turns.  Do you wonder police departments are now issuing tickets under Vehicle code section CVC§21453 (a) regardless of whether or not the motorist was turning right?

Here are both of these sections:

21453 Circular Red or Red Arrow

(a) A driver facing a steady circular red signal alone shall stop at a marked limit line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or, if none, then before entering the intersection, and shall remain stopped until an indication to proceed is shown, except as provided in subdivision (b).

(b) Except when a sign is in place prohibiting a turn, a driver, after stopping as required by subdivision (a), facing a steady circular red signal, may turn right, or turn left from a one-way street onto a one-way street. A driver making that turn shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians lawfully within an adjacent crosswalk and to any vehicle that has approached or is approaching so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard to the driver, and shall continue to yield the right-of-way to that vehicle until the driver can proceed with reasonable safety.

Now, here’s the distinction:

The first section (a) says nothing about right turns and is basically used for those who go straight through a red light.

The second section (b) essentially says you can turn after stopping if there is no sign prohibiting a turn on red.

So if you made a “California rolling stop” why wouldn’t you be cited for the second section (b) instead of (a) you might ask...

Check out this “Traffic Infraction Penalty Schedule” (from the January 2010 Edition Uniform Bail and Penalty Schedules, California Rules of Court, Rule 4,102):

Section: 21453 (a, c)
Offense: “Red” Signal- Vehicular Responsibilities
Total Bail/Fee (Keep in mind the so-called “Total Bail” is before a certain additional court or other fees that is added and there are 30 counties in CA authorized by law to exceed the total bail/fee):$380.00

Section: 21453 (b)
Offense: “Red” Signal- Vehicular Responsibilities With Right Turn
Total Bail/Fee (Keep in mind the so-called “Total Bail” is before a certain additional court or other fees that is added and there are 30 counties in CA authorized by law to exceed the total bail/fee):$146.00

Redflex & ATS Class Action Lawsuits

Bruce Simon from Palo Alto has filed a class-action lawsuit against the two largest companies who run red light cameras in San Mateo county Redflex and American Traffic Solutions. Simon says they're violating state law by including a so-called "cost neutral" provision in the contracts.  Simon says the camera makers reimburse cities when they can't make enough from tickets to pay for the monthly operational costs. It can't be a money loser for the cities and the companies will make up the difference.  Red light camera operators typically pick intersections that are going to be susceptible to the most tickets, says Simon.  We're going after the private companies that induce these municipalities to get into these contracts as revenue-enhancing vehicles, Simon said.  If it's supposed to be about safety and preventing accidents, the revenue aspect shouldn't be as important.

There have been court challenges to the cost-neutral clause and as a result, several Peninsula cities have stopped using the red light cameras, others are in the process of dropping it, among them is Redwood City.  Another trend seems to be the growing use of right turn cameras or those intersections that monitor if you make a "California Stop".  A California stop is also referred to as a rolling right turn. 

Related articles:
Red-light cameras in Redwood City have not resulted in a significant drop in accidents

Stop Sign Cameras

Photo Enforced Stop Sign Camera


Photo Enforced Stop Sign Camera Sensor

Photo enforced stop sign cameras are in operation in a few locations in California but a growing trend of cities desperate for money may change that soon. Stop sign cameras are issuing minor cities in these Southern California cities: Los Angeles, Topanga, and Pacific Palisades.  This intersection pictured above is in the Temescal Canyon Gateway Park.  We are aware of two other cameras which are located in Franklin Canyon, located off of Mulholland Drive, and another at the top of Topanga. Failure to come to a complete stop or roll through an intersection like this will get you a ticket of $125 in the mail.  Pictured above is a maroon camera in the background and the sensors just before the stop sign.   Photo enforced stop sign cameras are in operation in a few locations in California but a growing trend of cities desperate for money may change that soon.

Rolling right turn cameras are another trend that is growing and these fines are typically around $150 in California.  Running a red light camera on the other hand will get you a fine of nearly $500.  You can access tour entire database of stop sign cameras throughout the USA by searching our database at PhotoEnforced.com

Failure to Stop on Red Ticket

stop here on red photo enforcement

How much does a Failure to Stop on Red ticket cost?  We have over 170 locations in our database (as of February 2010) around the US in and the fine ranges from $50 on the East Coast and up to $350 on the West Coast in California.   The amount of the fine is set by each city and would recommend you search for "Right Turn Cameras" in our open database at PhotoEnforced.com to get a better idea of what it will be in your city.

Illegal rolling right turns are when a driver does not come to a "complete stop" before making the turn. These turns result in a ticket when the driver makes a right turn on red regardless if they came to a complete stop. It's a very "grey area" what a "complete stop" is but I have been told it's anything under 7MPH.  If you are traveling over 7MPH measured by the camera pictured above you will likely get a ticket.

Photo enforcement of illegal right turns or failure to stop on red is becoming a very popular revenue source among many cities around the US. Illegal right turns are made when a sign clearly states "no right on red" or "after stopping a right turn is permitted on red' or "stop here on red" (pictured above).

We would appreciate any feedback from drivers around the Country to clarify this below under comments.

Loma Linda Keeps Rolling Right Turn Cameras

Press-Enterprise - Monday, February 15, 2010

The City Council agreed last week to leave the cameras in place at four intersections on Redlands Boulevard and Barton Road after learning that the number of traffic citations has dramatically dropped and that it would cost the city more than $534,000 to cancel its contract with the camera operator 10 months early.

Four months after Redflex Traffic Systems installed the cameras in 2006, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department reported that it was writing 1,200 tickets a month. Last month, City Attorney Richard Holdaway said the cameras captured 451 potential violations and only 157 tickets were issued.

Of the violations spotted in January, Holdaway said, 130 potential citations were not written because the deputy reviewing the pictures made "a finding of safe right turn on red."

City Council members say they have been besieged with complaints from motorists forced to pay a fine of more than $450 for not making a complete stop before turning right at the intersections of Anderson Street and Mountain View Avenue with Barton Road and Redlands Boulevard.

Holdaway met in closed session with the council last week to advise council members on the legal ramifications of cancelling Redflex's contract before it expires in December.

Then, in public session, City Manager T. Jarb Thaipejr disclosed that the cost to the city would be $534,558.83 if the contract were terminated this month and would amount to $42,000 a month for the remaining term if the council pulls the plug later this year.

Councilmen Rhodes "Dusty" Rigsby and Ovidiu Popescu lobbied last month for either pulling the plug on the cameras or telling the Sheriff's Department not to enforce right-turn violations based on photos from the cameras. They said the $13.5 million in fines imposed since the cameras were installed has been draining the local economy and discouraging people from driving to and through the city of 22,000 residents.

Holdaway said the state Vehicle Code precludes the city from ordering deputies not to write citations.

"Ultimately," he said, "the Sheriff's Department has the sole discretion as to whether or not to issue a citation. We need to respect that discretion that the law enforcement officer has.

"As a result of this discussion, the Sheriff's Department is exercising that discretion ... and they're looking at some of the safety issues, whether or not a particular situation rises to a significant safety violation," Holdaway said. "Right turn situations, the notorious California stop, are some of the situations that they're looking at."

Rigsby noted that the city's decision to increase the length of time that the lights are yellow by one second, at the expense of green lights, has reduced the number of left-turn violations from 240 month to 25 or 30.

He said the most egregious violations involve motorists who drive straight ahead through red lights and those incidents at the four intersections produced only five violations.

"That is tremendous improvement in safety from what we were seeing in the past," he said. "We could have had that safety with lengthening the yellow lights four years ago instead of installing red-light cameras.

Councilman Floyd Petersen, who has complained about the steep fines for right turns, said he was impressed with the decline in violations. He said it is "a very strong indication ... of increased safety at the intersections."

He also said that despite that decline, "I still very, very strongly feel that another issue needs to be addressed here. A $450 ticket for right-hand turn is ludicrous."

Mayor Stan Brauer acknowledged concerns about the message that ignoring violations would have.

"What do we tell our teen-age drivers? Well, you don't need to stop for red lights," he said.

Popescu said he is "very optimistic" after learning that the Sheriff's Department is writing fewer citations for right turns.

He said he still believes the city has a "viable option for us to get out of the contract early, given what I believe is an injury to the community."

He conceded, however, that the cost may be prohibitive.

"I think it is a little early" to make a final decision, he said, and vowed to bring up the issue again at the council's March 9 meeting.

Top 10 Reasons Why Red Light Camera Tickets Are Not Enforced


Depending on the state, county, or province, the laws regarding red light camera ticket citations are different. Some red-light camera ticket photos can't be used or enforced for different reasons. These are the top 10 reasons for the tickets not being enforced:

1) Both images do not show vehicle through the intersection during the red light
2) Unreadable license plate due to glare, lighting or obstruction of license plate
3) No license plate or the dealer plate logo is showing from the transfer of ownership
4) Out of State plates - Not sure about this one in every State?
5) Weather-related image distortion due to rain, snow, dust or wind
6) Invalid or temporary license plates
7) No DMV match to the registered vehicle driver, some states only require a photo of the vehicle
8) Traffic signal, camera, flash malfunction
9) Poor image quality or focus
10) The driver was not you and you may submit a Declaration of Non-liability.  Snitch tickets

As always we would appreciate here feedback about your experiences related to the enforcement of tickets due to these circumstances and any others we are missing. We are especially curious about #4) out of State plates and the enforcement of tickets.

Please do not consider any of the information on this page as legal representative advice to be used in any court of law. PhotoEnforced.com will not be held liable for any information in this article.

Popular Articles (All Time)