Updated Red Light and Speed Camera Fine Information by State

As a driver, knowing the laws, fines, and potential license points tied to red light cameras and speed cameras is essential for avoiding costly mistakes. While these automated enforcement systems are designed to improve road safety, they also create unexpected expenses for drivers who are caught off guard.

This updated guide provides a state-by-state breakdown of fines and points for red light and speed camera violations across the U.S. Remember: penalties can vary by city or county, so always verify with local traffic laws for the most accurate details.

Red Light Camera Fines and Points

Red light camera tickets are among the most common automated traffic violations. Depending on where you live, these citations may carry hefty fines and even license points.

Table: Red Light Camera Penalties by State

State	Red Light Camera Fine ($)	Points
Alabama	$100	No Points
Arizona	$165–$250	2 Points
Arkansas	No Programs	–
California	$490	1 Point
Colorado	$40–$80	4 Points
Delaware	$75–$230	–
District of Columbia	$150	0 to 2 Points
Florida	$200	–
Georgia	$70	No Points
Hawaii	$77	–
Illinois	$100–$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	–
Iowa	$45–$150	–
Kansas	No Programs	–
Louisiana	$100–$140	No Points
Maryland	$100	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	–
Minnesota	No Programs	–
Mississippi	No Programs	–
Missouri	$100	–
Nevada	No Programs	–
New Jersey	$85	No Points
New Mexico	$75	–
New York	$50–$100	No Points
North Carolina	$50–$100	3 Points
Ohio	$100–$200	–
Oklahoma	No Programs	–
Oregon	$260–$1,000	–
Pennsylvania	$100	No Points
Rhode Island	$75	–
South Dakota	No Programs	–
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	State Ban	–
Virginia	$100–$200	0 to 4 Points
Washington	$124–$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	–
Wisconsin	No Programs	–

Speed Camera Fines and Points

Speed cameras are often placed near schools, work zones, and high-risk corridors. Violations can carry steep fines and, in some states, license points.

Table: Speed Camera Penalties by State

State	Speed Camera Fine ($)	Points
Alabama	–	–
Arizona	$165–$250	2 Points
Arkansas	–	–
California	–	–
Colorado	$40–$80	4 Points
Delaware	–	–
District of Columbia	$50–$300	0, 3, 4, or 5 Points
Florida	–	–
Georgia	–	–
Hawaii	–	–
Illinois	$250–$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	–
Iowa	$45–$150	–
Kansas	No Programs	–
Louisiana	–	–
Maryland	$40–$1,000	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	–
Minnesota	No Programs	–
Mississippi	No Programs	–
Missouri	–	–
Nevada	No Programs	–
New Jersey	–	–
New Mexico	$75	–
New York	$90–$1,200	No Points (Possible Jail Time)
North Carolina	–	–
Ohio	$100–$200	–
Oklahoma	No Programs	–
Oregon	$110–$2,000	–
Pennsylvania	–	–
Rhode Island	–	–
South Dakota	No Programs	–
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	–	–
Virginia	–	–
Washington	$124–$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	–
Wisconsin	No Programs	–

Strictest vs. Most Lenient States

Some states hit drivers with extremely high fines and points, while others either ban camera enforcement or assign minimal penalties. Here’s how the states compare:

Top 10 Strictest States for Camera Enforcement

Rank	State	Fine Range	Points
1	Oregon	$260–$2,000	Up to 4
2	New York	$90–$1,200	No Points (Possible Jail Time)
3	Illinois	$100–$500 (Red Light), $250–$500 (Speed)	20 Points
4	California	$490 (Red Light)	1 Point
5	Maryland	$40–$1,000 (Speed)	No Points
6	Washington, D.C.	$50–$300	Up to 5 Points
7	Washington State	$124–$250	No Points
8	Arizona	$165–$250	2 Points
9	Virginia	$100–$200	Up to 4 Points
10	Colorado	$40–$80	4 Points

Top 10 Most Lenient States

Rank	State	Enforcement	Notes
1	Texas	State Ban	Red light cameras prohibited statewide
2	Michigan	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
3	Minnesota	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
4	Wisconsin	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
5	West Virginia	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
6	South Dakota	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
7	Oklahoma	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
8	Kansas	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
9	Indiana	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras
10	Nevada	No Programs	No red light or speed cameras

Key Takeaways for Drivers

• Local Differences Matter: Even within the same state, municipalities may set their own fine schedules and enforcement policies.

• Laws Change Frequently: Traffic enforcement regulations are updated often. Stay informed to avoid surprises.

• Safe Driving Saves Money: Obeying traffic signals and speed limits not only prevents fines but also protects your driving record and insurance rates.

Final Word

By knowing the fines and points tied to red light and speed camera tickets, you can make smarter driving decisions and avoid costly penalties. Always double-check the latest local traffic enforcement laws before hitting the road.

Snitch Tickets: How to Recognize and Handle Them

Don’t tattle on a friend or a family member for driving your car.

🚦 Rolling Right Turns: A Hidden Goldmine for Cities?

Are Right Turns on Red Quietly Taxing Drivers?

How to Pay or Fight a Red Light Camera Ticket

 

<

If you’ve received a red light camera ticket in the mail, you’re probably frustrated, confused, or even angry. The fines often range from $50 up to $500 depending on your state or city, and the notice usually comes with a photo of your vehicle and instructions to pay quickly. Unfortunately, we are not the company or city that collects this ticket revenue, nor do we operate the cameras. Many visitors mistakenly believe that Photo Enforced runs the enforcement programs, but that is not the case. What we do is provide information, maps, and resources to help you understand your options before you pay.

Do You Really Need to Pay Right Away?

Before rushing to pay, take a moment to understand your rights. Many drivers are surprised to learn that they may have valid defenses, and paying immediately is not always the best option. In some cases, the ticket may not be enforceable, or you may have grounds for dismissal. Calibration errors, missing warning signs, or unclear photos are just some of the reasons that drivers have successfully fought tickets.

Many people simply assume the only option is to pay, but contesting may be possible in your jurisdiction. If you pay right away, you essentially admit guilt and waive your chance to challenge the ticket in court.

Why Drivers Mistake Us for “Big Brother”

Because we own the domain Photo Enforced, some visitors think we are the ones issuing tickets or operating the cameras. We regularly receive emails with questions like, “Can I look up and see if I received a ticket?” or “Where do I go to pay?” The answer is always the same: you need to contact your local courthouse in the city where the violation occurred or log into the official ticket payment system used by the municipality or its contractor.

The Problem With Fragmented Customer Service

This confusion highlights a bigger issue: customer service management for red light camera programs is far from efficient. Every city, county, or private contractor seems to run its own system. Drivers are left hunting for the right website, waiting weeks for mailed notices, or dealing with tickets that go to outdated mailing addresses. This leads to unnecessary frustration, late fees, and missed deadlines.

There should be a national destination website for ticketed drivers. A centralized database would allow individuals to log in securely, see whether they received a ticket, and pay the fine online. Drivers could also update their mailing address, ensuring that notices reach the right person. Such a system would not only help drivers but also improve payment recovery rates for cities. Instead of waiting two weeks for a letter, guilty drivers could resolve their cases immediately online. Unfortunately, no such national portal exists, leaving drivers to navigate a patchwork of local systems.

Should You Pay or Fight?

Before paying your fine, consider whether you might have grounds to fight. Common defenses include missing warning signs, unclear photographs, improper camera calibration, or not being the actual driver at the time of the violation. Courts in some jurisdictions have dismissed tickets when the evidence was weak or when proper procedures were not followed. Fighting may save you hundreds of dollars and protect your driving record.

On the other hand, if the evidence is clear and the fine is relatively low, paying promptly might be the simplest solution. The decision depends on your situation, your state’s laws, and whether you’re willing to invest time in challenging the ticket.

How to Pay a Red Light Camera Ticket

If you’ve decided to pay, here’s how to do it:

1. Check the official notice. Your mailed ticket will include instructions and a website or courthouse location.

2. Go online to the correct portal. Many tickets are processed through contractor sites such as PhotoNotice.com. Other cities may have their own systems.

3. Enter your details. Typically, you’ll need your citation number, license plate, and sometimes driver’s license information.

4. Make payment. Most sites accept credit or debit cards. Some allow e-checks or mailed money orders.

5. Save your receipt. Always keep a confirmation in case of disputes or record errors.

Paying your ticket this way ensures it is logged in the system, helping you avoid additional penalties or late fees.

Useful Payment Websites

Here are some of the most common resources drivers use to pay tickets:

• PhotoNotice.com – a payment site used by RedFlex for many U.S. cities

• Individual city or county court websites – often listed directly on your citation

When you visit a payment portal, you’ll usually see a welcome screen prompting you to enter your citation details. From there, you can review the photographic evidence, confirm the violation, and submit your payment securely.

The Bigger Picture

Red light camera programs have sparked debates across the country. Supporters argue that they improve safety by reducing red light running. Opponents claim they are more about revenue than safety, pointing to the millions of dollars collected each year. What is clear is that the system is not user-friendly. A more transparent, centralized solution would reduce confusion, improve fairness, and give drivers a straightforward way to resolve citations. Until then, drivers must carefully read their notices, double-check the payment portals, and decide whether to pay or fight.

Final Thoughts

Receiving a red light camera ticket is stressful, but you do have options. You can pay the fine quickly through the correct online portal, or you can explore legal defenses to contest it. The key is to act promptly, whether you are paying or fighting. Our role is not to collect fines but to provide drivers with clear information so they can make informed decisions. If you need to pay, use a trusted site such as PhotoNotice.com or your local courthouse portal. If you want to challenge the ticket, consider researching defenses like improper signage or unclear evidence. With the right knowledge, you can avoid costly mistakes and handle your ticket in the best way for your situation.

Facts a Police Officer Must Verify Before Issuing a Ticket

When a police officer pulls over a vehicle, it's not as simple as writing a ticket right away. There are specific facts and legal steps officers must verify before issuing a citation. Understanding these requirements can help drivers protect their rights and avoid unjust penalties.

In this article, we’ll break down the key facts a police officer must confirm before issuing a ticket, whether it’s for speeding, running a red light, illegal parking, or another traffic violation.

1. Probable Cause for the Stop

Before any ticket can be written, a police officer must have probable cause to initiate a traffic stop. This means the officer must observe a clear violation of traffic law or have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.

Examples of Probable Cause:

• Speeding over the posted limit (measured with radar or LIDAR)

• Failing to stop at a stop sign or red light

• Weaving between lanes (possible DUI)

• Expired registration or visible vehicle defects (e.g., broken tail light)

2. Driver Identification

Once the vehicle is stopped, the officer must verify the identity of the driver. This includes checking:

• Valid driver’s license

• Vehicle registration

• Proof of insurance

If any of these documents are missing, expired, or fraudulent, the officer may issue additional citations beyond the initial reason for the stop.

3. Accurate Speed Measurement (for Speeding Tickets)

For speeding tickets, officers must have clear and accurate evidence of the driver’s speed. This is typically done using:

• Radar guns

• LIDAR systems

• Pacing (using the officer’s own speedometer while following the car)

• Speed cameras (in jurisdictions where they are legal)

Officers are also required to be trained and certified to use speed detection equipment. Malfunctioning or uncalibrated devices can lead to a ticket being dismissed in court.

4. Clear Signage and Road Markings

Officers must ensure that traffic laws were violated in a clearly marked zone. For example:

• Speed limits must be posted at regular intervals

• No-parking zones must be clearly signed

• Stop signs and traffic signals must be visible and unobstructed

If signage is missing, obscured, or incorrect, a driver may be able to contest the ticket successfully.

5. Legal Authority and Jurisdiction

A police officer must have the jurisdiction and authority to enforce traffic laws in the location where the violation occurred. For example, a campus security officer cannot issue state traffic tickets unless granted specific authority.

6. Documented Evidence

In many cases, especially when drivers contest tickets, courts require that officers provide:

• Written notes or dashcam/bodycam footage

• Accurate time and location of the offense

• Description of the vehicle and driver’s behavior

This documentation helps ensure tickets are based on facts, not assumptions.

7. Driver’s Right to Explanation

Though not a requirement for issuing a ticket, police are expected to allow the driver a chance to explain. This can sometimes lead to a warning instead of a citation, especially for minor infractions.

Final Thoughts

Traffic tickets are legal documents, and police officers must verify multiple facts before they can be lawfully issued. If any of these elements are missing, the ticket may be invalid or subject to dismissal in court.

Understanding your rights and the legal obligations of law enforcement can help you make informed decisions during traffic stops. If you believe a ticket was issued without proper verification, consider consulting a traffic attorney or contesting it in court.

Red Light Camera Warning Signs

Red light cameras are increasingly common at busy intersections, and their purpose is to deter dangerous driving and reduce collisions. But many drivers ask the same question: why are there warning signs at some intersections and not at others?

The answer depends on local and state laws. In California, for example, there’s a specific statute—VC § 21455.5(a)(1)—that governs where red light camera warning signs must be posted. In other states, the rules are much less clear. This article breaks down the purpose of warning signs, the legal requirements behind them, and how you can use them to defend against a ticket.

Why Are There Red Light Camera Warning Signs?

The goal of red light camera warning signs is to provide fair notice to drivers. These signs are meant to ensure that drivers know enforcement is in place so they can make safer decisions approaching intersections.

The law recognizes that posting a sign is one of the most obvious ways to alert drivers. While the most visible option would be to place a sign directly on the traffic signal itself, statutes often allow flexibility, and cities take advantage of that.

What the California Law Says

According to VC § 21455.5(a)(1):

“Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes.”

This means California cities have two options:

1. Post warning signs at the intersections where cameras are installed, visible to all approaching traffic.

2. Place signs at all main entrances to the city, including freeways, bridges, and highways.

The law requires signs, but it doesn’t always require them to be at the exact location of the intersection.

How Close Do Signs Have to Be?

One of the gray areas in the law is distance from the intersection. California statutes are vague on how close a warning sign must be. The decision is often left up to cities.

• Signs might be posted directly at the intersection—mounted on a traffic signal pole.

• They might also be placed further back, at the entrance to a city or highway off-ramp.

According to Caltrans design standards, signs must be at least 30 inches wide, 40 inches high, and 6 feet off the ground. But there’s no firm requirement on distance from the enforced intersection.

This means drivers may not see a warning sign until well before or after they’ve passed through an area.

Why Placement Matters

If warning signs are hidden, damaged, too small, or posted far away, it can affect the legitimacy of the enforcement program. Courts in some cases have dismissed tickets when drivers proved they didn’t receive the required notice.

For example, if you receive a red light photo ticket, you should check whether:

• Signs were posted at the intersection.

• Signs were posted at city entrances or highway ramps.

• Signs were the correct size and height.

• Signs were visible, not blocked by trees, construction, or other signs.

If you can show that warning signs weren’t posted in accordance with VC § 21455.5(a)(1), you may be able to contest the ticket.

The Purpose Behind Warning Sign Laws

Cities and states include warning sign requirements for several reasons:

1. Transparency: Drivers deserve to know when they’re under camera enforcement.

2. Deterrence: If drivers see a warning sign, they are more likely to stop on yellow rather than risk running a red.

3. Public Perception: Signs help reduce criticism that cameras are “money traps” rather than safety tools.

Why Some Intersections Don’t Have Signs

Even when laws require them, cities often have discretion in how they post signs. Some common practices include:

• Placing only citywide entrance signs instead of at every intersection.

• Installing signs at freeway exits leading into camera-enforced areas.

• Using “Photo Enforced” plaques mounted under traffic lights at only select intersections.

This explains why some intersections appear to lack warning signs, even though enforcement is active.

Contesting a Ticket Using Signage Issues

If you’ve been cited at a red light camera intersection, one defense strategy is to challenge whether proper warning signs were posted.

Steps to take:

1. Return to the Location – Revisit the intersection where the violation occurred.

2. Document with Photos – Capture images of missing, blocked, or damaged signs.

3. Compare with Standards – Check whether the signs meet Caltrans or state size/height requirements.

4. Present in Court – Argue that the lack of proper signage means you weren’t given fair notice.

Warning Signs in Other States

Not every state requires red light camera signs. For example:

• New York City: Publishes camera locations online but doesn’t require signs at every intersection.

• Florida: Some cities place signs at city entrances instead of each intersection.

• Illinois: Requires clear signage at camera locations.

• Texas: Before banning cameras statewide, intersections had to be signed.

Because laws vary, it’s important for drivers to check their own state’s vehicle code.

Safety vs. Revenue Debate

Supporters of warning signs argue they encourage compliance and reduce crashes. Critics argue that cities sometimes minimize signage to maximize revenue. This debate continues in many states where drivers complain that warning signs are hard to see or inconsistently placed.

The underlying question: are cameras really about safety or money? Warning signs are one of the clearest ways cities can show they are prioritizing safety.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are red light camera warning signs required everywhere?
A: No. Some states mandate them, while others only require public notice or online lists.

Q: How big are the signs supposed to be?
A: In California, Caltrans requires them to be at least 30 inches wide, 40 inches tall, and 6 feet off the ground.

Q: Can I fight a ticket if there was no sign?
A: Yes—if state law requires signs and they were missing, hidden, or not compliant, you may have grounds to dispute.

Q: Why do some intersections have signs and others don’t?
A: Cities often use flexibility in the law, posting signs at city entrances or highway off-ramps instead of at every intersection.

Q: Do warning signs guarantee I won’t get a ticket?
A: No. They are meant as notice, not protection. If you run a red light, the camera will still record the violation.

Conclusion

Red light camera warning signs play a vital role in traffic enforcement. They provide legal notice, improve transparency, and give drivers a fair chance to adjust their behavior. But laws vary widely by state, and even within states, cities have flexibility in where and how signs are posted.

If you’ve been ticketed, checking whether proper signs were in place can be an important part of your defense. Missing, hidden, or non-compliant signage can sometimes invalidate a citation.

For drivers, the key lesson is this: always watch for warning signs when entering a city or approaching a busy intersection—but don’t assume that the absence of a sign means there are no cameras.

Related articles: 

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

Stop Sign Photo Enforced Camera Locations

Photo enforcement cameras at stop signs—devices that detect vehicles failing to stop fully—are becoming increasingly common in parts of the U.S. As traffic safety concerns mount, municipalities are turning to automated cameras to enforce compliance. But where exactly are these cameras located? How do jurisdictions decide where to put them? What are the impacts and legal issues? This article covers real examples, location criteria, benefits and controversies, and what to do if you suspect you’re being monitored.

What Are Stop Sign Photo Enforcement Cameras?

These systems use cameras aimed at intersections to capture images of vehicles that do not come to a complete stop at a stop sign. Key features include:

• Trigger condition when a vehicle crosses the stop line without a full halt

• Photograph and/or video of the vehicle and license plate

• Automated detection or manual review before issuing a violation notice

• Signage or notification where legally required

They differ from red-light or speed-camera systems in that they specifically focus on stop signs.

Why Use Stop-Sign Cameras

Municipalities deploy them to:

• Reduce collisions and near-misses at dangerous intersections

• Improve pedestrian safety, especially near schools and neighborhoods

• Encourage consistent driver compliance

• Supplement law enforcement when officer presence is limited

Where These Cameras Are Located: Real-World Examples

Jurisdiction	Specific Locations / Details
Brentwood, Maryland	Stop sign cameras at multiple intersections including Utah Avenue & 40th Street, Allison Street & 37th Street, and 38th Street at Volta Avenue.
Prince George’s County, Maryland	Towns like Morningside and Colmar Manor installed several cameras after new authorization. Morningside has six sites, Colmar Manor three.
College Park, Maryland	Pilot program with cameras at Cherokee Street & 49th Avenue, Rhode Island Avenue & Lakeland Road, and St. Andrews Place & Duke Street. These initially collected data without issuing citations.
Washington, D.C.	The city’s Automated Safety Camera program includes stop-sign enforcement, with stationary camera sites across the District.

These examples show the range from pilots collecting data to full enforcement issuing citations.

How Locations Are Chosen

Authorities consider several factors when selecting stop-sign camera locations:

1. Crash data and violation history – Intersections with repeated stop sign running or accidents.

2. Pedestrian zones – Areas near schools or heavy foot traffic.

3. Visibility – Ensuring the stop sign is clearly seen by drivers.

4. Legal authority – Compliance with local or state laws permitting camera use.

5. Technology – Reliable sensors and calibration standards.

6. Public input – Community forums or city council approvals.

Legal and Policy Issues

Stop-sign camera enforcement is still developing, raising legal and policy questions:

• Statutory authority: In many places, explicit authorization is required before tickets can be issued.

• Evidence standards: Authorities must prove the vehicle failed to stop completely and that signage was visible.

• Privacy concerns: Residents worry about constant surveillance in neighborhoods.

• Grace periods: Questions over whether a vehicle must be completely still or if slow rolling is acceptable.

• Warning signs: Some states require visible notices where enforcement cameras operate.

• Appeals process: Drivers need fair procedures to contest citations.

Impact and Early Results

Early data shows stop-sign cameras can significantly reduce violations:

• In Morningside and Colmar Manor, Maryland, stop-sign running dropped by nearly 50% after cameras were installed.

• In Washington, D.C., eight stop-sign cameras recorded more than 120,000 citations in one year.

These numbers suggest strong deterrence, though critics argue revenue collection is a hidden motive.

States and Localities Permitting Stop Sign Cameras

The legal status varies widely:

• Maryland: Several counties and towns have programs or pilots.

• Washington, D.C.: Fully integrated into the city’s automated enforcement program.

• Other states: Few have explicit stop-sign camera programs, though pilot studies are expanding.

Some states may resist adoption due to privacy concerns, lack of legislation, or strong local opposition.

Pros and Cons

Pros	Cons
Improves safety by reducing violations and crashes	Risk of false positives and unfair penalties
Encourages better compliance near schools and residential areas	Raises privacy and surveillance concerns
Reduces enforcement costs and reliance on police officers	Public perception of revenue-driven enforcement
Provides data on dangerous intersections	Legal challenges over accuracy and fairness

What To Do If You Suspect a Stop Sign Camera Nearby

1. Check city or police websites – Many publish enforcement camera locations.

2. Look for signage – Warning signs are often posted near enforced intersections.

3. Review meeting minutes – Local councils often discuss new enforcement programs.

4. Observe intersections – Look for mounted cameras, poles, or solar units.

5. Check news sources – Local coverage frequently highlights new enforcement.

6. If you receive a citation – Review the evidence, signage, and appeal if necessary.

Enforcement and Penalties

• Usually civil fines rather than criminal offenses

• Fines range from $50 to $200 depending on the city

• Some jurisdictions give warnings during early pilot phases

• Many do not add points to a driving record, but this depends on state law

• Appeals processes often allow review of photos or video evidence

Future Trends and Technology

• AI and smarter sensors may reduce false positives.

• Expansion of pilots into new states and cities is expected as early data shows safety improvements.

• Public awareness campaigns may help residents understand the safety goals.

• Legislative updates could standardize rules and penalties for photo enforcement.

Summary

Stop sign cameras are a growing tool for municipalities looking to reduce violations and crashes. Locations in Maryland and Washington, D.C. show how they are used in practice, with significant reductions in stop-sign running. However, legal hurdles, privacy concerns, and public perception issues remain challenges.

Conclusion

If you wonder whether a stop sign camera is near you, check local government resources, observe signage, and follow news updates. While not as widespread as red-light cameras, stop-sign enforcement technology is spreading as communities seek new ways to improve safety. Staying aware of these programs helps drivers remain compliant and avoid costly fines.

If Red Light Cameras Are Shut Down, Do You Still Have to Pay Tickets?

Many cities across the U.S. are rethinking the use of red light and speed cameras, leading some to shut down their automated traffic enforcement systems. If you receive a ticket from a camera system that is later turned off, you may wonder if you’re still responsible for paying the fine. This guide explains what happens to tickets when cameras are shut down and how the rules may vary depending on your location.

Why Are Some Cities Shutting Down Traffic Cameras?

Red light and speed cameras have been a controversial enforcement tool. While some argue they improve safety and reduce accidents, others criticize them for prioritizing revenue over safety and being prone to technical errors. Common reasons for shutting down traffic cameras include:

• Legal Challenges: Lawsuits and legal challenges have questioned the legality of some camera programs.
• Public Pressure: Public opposition has led some cities to discontinue their programs, especially if residents believe the cameras are unfair or ineffective.
• Cost of Maintenance: Some cities find that maintaining the cameras is too costly relative to the revenue generated, especially if they are required to make regular updates to stay compliant.

Do You Still Have to Pay for a Ticket If Cameras Are Turned Off?

If the cameras are shut down after your ticket was issued, whether or not you have to pay depends on a few factors:

1. Date of Ticket Issuance: Most cities require drivers to pay fines for tickets that were issued while the cameras were still active, regardless of whether they are later turned off. This is because the ticket was legally valid at the time it was issued.

2. Local and State Laws: Some states have laws specifying that all tickets issued prior to a program’s shutdown remain enforceable, while other areas may offer amnesty or dismiss tickets following camera shutdowns, especially if there were legal issues involved.

3. Ticket Dismissal Policies: In certain cases, cities or courts may choose to dismiss outstanding tickets if they determine that the cameras were improperly managed or did not meet legal standards.

What Happens if You Ignore a Ticket from a Shut-Down Camera?

Ignoring a ticket, even if the cameras have been turned off, can lead to further consequences. Possible outcomes of ignoring the ticket include:

• Increased Fines and Late Fees: Unpaid tickets often accrue late fees or additional penalties, which increase the total amount due.
• License Suspension or Points: In some states, unpaid traffic tickets can lead to license suspension or points on your driving record.
• Credit Score Impact: Some jurisdictions turn unpaid traffic tickets over to collections, which can impact your credit score.

It’s essential to confirm whether you are still responsible for payment before assuming a ticket is void, as consequences may vary by jurisdiction.

Steps to Take If You Receive a Ticket and the Camera Is Later Shut Down

1. Check Local Laws and Policies: Each state and city has different rules regarding ticket enforcement after camera shutdowns. Look up your local DMV or traffic court’s policies, or contact them directly for clarification.

2. Consult Legal Help: If you believe the ticket was issued unfairly or if you think there is a legal basis for dismissal, consulting a traffic attorney may be beneficial, especially if there were known issues with the camera program.

3. Look for Potential Refunds or Amnesty Programs: In rare cases, cities have offered refunds or amnesty for tickets issued by systems that were later shut down. Keep an eye on news updates or city announcements.

Examples of Cities That Shut Down Traffic Cameras and the Impact on Tickets

Some cities have discontinued their traffic camera programs and handled ticket enforcement differently. For example:

• Houston, Texas: After Houston voters rejected the city’s red light camera program, the city ultimately turned off the cameras. However, drivers were still responsible for paying tickets issued while the cameras were operational.
• Los Angeles, California: Los Angeles ceased its red light camera program in 2011, but all unpaid tickets before the shutdown were treated as non-enforceable, and drivers with unpaid tickets faced no penalties.

Final Thoughts

Receiving a ticket from a camera that’s later turned off can be confusing, but ignoring it isn’t necessarily the best course of action. Generally, tickets issued before a program’s shutdown remain legally valid. Be sure to review local laws, check for any changes to enforcement policies, and consider consulting a traffic attorney if you have questions. By staying informed, you can navigate the process and avoid unnecessary penalties or fees.

What Is A Red Light Camera?

How Red Light Cameras Work: Everything You Need to Know

Red light cameras are a common traffic enforcement tool designed to improve safety at intersections. They automatically capture images or video of vehicles that run a red light, providing evidence that law enforcement can use to issue citations. While these systems are controversial in some places, they have been shown to reduce dangerous crashes caused by red-light running.

This guide explains how red light cameras work, what happens if you’re caught, where they’re used, and why yellow-light timing rules matter.

What Is a Red Light Camera?

A red light camera is an automated system installed at intersections to detect and photograph vehicles that enter after the traffic light has turned red. These cameras are typically housed in secure metal boxes mounted on poles. Unlike handheld radar guns used by police officers, red light cameras are permanent fixtures and are usually placed at high-risk intersections where violations or collisions are frequent.

More than 75 countries worldwide use red light cameras, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, China, and several European nations. Their widespread adoption shows how important governments consider them for traffic safety.

When Do Red Light Cameras Trigger?

The key factor is when your vehicle crosses the white stop bar.

• Safe: If your car crosses the stop line before the signal turns red, you are not in violation, even if the light changes while you are still in the intersection.

• Violation: If your front tires cross the white line after the light has already turned red, the system registers the event as a violation.

Once this happens, the system activates and begins capturing evidence.

How the System Detects Violations

Most red light camera systems use inductive loops embedded in the pavement just before the stop line. These loops measure the speed of an approaching vehicle. Using this calculation, the system determines whether a driver could have safely stopped.

If the car enters after the light turns red, the camera takes two photos:

1. First photo: The vehicle at or just beyond the stop line with the signal clearly red.

2. Second photo: The vehicle fully inside the intersection a moment later.

Some systems also capture a short video clip showing the entire sequence.

What Evidence Is Collected?

Red light cameras don’t just take a picture of your license plate. They collect multiple data points to establish proof of the violation:

• Date and time of the incident

• Intersection location

• Speed of the vehicle

• Elapsed time since the light turned red

• Photographs and/or video showing the vehicle before and after entering the intersection

This evidence is then sent to law enforcement for review.

The Citation Process

Unlike a parking ticket left on your windshield, red light camera violations are typically processed through the mail. Here’s the step-by-step process:

1. Photo review: A trained law enforcement official reviews the images and video to confirm the violation.

2. Citation issued: If confirmed, a citation is mailed to the registered vehicle owner.

3. Notice of violation (sometimes): In cases where the driver cannot be clearly identified, some jurisdictions issue a “notice of violation,” requiring the owner to provide the driver’s details.

Depending on local laws, fines can range from $50 to over $500, and violations may or may not add points to your driving record.

Global Use of Red Light Cameras

Red light cameras are used in:

• North America: United States, Canada

• Europe: United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain

• Asia-Pacific: China, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand

In the U.S., adoption varies by state. Some states allow widespread use, while others ban them entirely due to privacy and fairness concerns.

Timing Rules and Grace Periods

Studies show that:

• 38% of violations occur within 0.25 seconds of the light turning red.

• 79% occur within the first second.

This has raised concerns that short yellow-light times unfairly increase violations. Some camera systems include a 0.5-second “grace period” to reduce unfair ticketing.

State-Specific Rules

• Ohio and Georgia: Require one extra second of yellow light at intersections with cameras. This change reduced tickets by up to 80%.

• New Jersey: Has some of the strictest yellow-light rules. Timing must be based on the 85th percentile speed (the speed most drivers travel) rather than the posted speed limit. This ensures fairness and prevents cities from using cameras mainly to raise revenue.

These laws highlight the balance between safety enforcement and fair traffic management.

Do Red Light Cameras Improve Safety?

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), red light cameras are effective at reducing serious crashes, especially right-angle (T-bone) collisions caused by red-light running. However, critics argue they may increase rear-end collisions, as drivers brake suddenly to avoid tickets.

Research generally shows that the reduction in severe crashes outweighs the rise in minor ones. IIHS reports that intersections with red light cameras see a significant decline in fatal crashes.

Common Criticisms

While intended for safety, red light cameras are controversial. Common criticisms include:

• Revenue generation: Some cities have been accused of using cameras more for profit than safety.

• Unfair tickets: Short yellow times or unclear intersections can lead to unfair violations.

• Privacy concerns: Critics argue that constant surveillance is a step toward intrusive monitoring.

• Driver behavior: Some say cameras encourage abrupt braking, increasing the risk of rear-end collisions.

Because of these concerns, some states and cities have voted to remove or ban red light cameras altogether.

Red light cameras remain one of the most debated traffic enforcement technologies. Supporters argue they reduce dangerous crashes and make intersections safer, while critics view them as revenue machines that unfairly ticket drivers.

Understanding how they work, when they trigger, and what laws apply in your state can help you avoid costly citations. More importantly, knowing the rules encourages safer driving and helps prevent serious accidents at intersections.

For more resources, you can explore:

• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)

• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

FAQ: Red Light Cameras

Do red light cameras flash?
Yes. Many use a flash at night or in low-light conditions to capture a clear image of the license plate.

Can I fight a red light camera ticket?
Yes. Drivers can contest citations in court by challenging the accuracy of the system, the timing of the yellow light, or the clarity of the photo.

How long does it take to get a ticket in the mail?
Usually within 1–2 weeks, though it varies by state.

Do all intersections have red light cameras?
No. They are selectively installed at intersections with high crash rates or frequent violations.

Can I get points on my license?
This depends on state law. In some states, violations are treated as civil infractions without points; in others, they add to your driving record.

Notice of Violation 

In certain police departments in California, where a definitive identification can not be made, the vehicle's registered owner will be issued a traffic violation warning instead of a real ticket. Often known as "snitch tickets" these documents are used during the suspected infringement to request identity information about the vehicle's driver.  Since these notices were not filed in court, they hold no legal weight and there is no duty on the registered owner to answer. A genuine ticket in California will bear the name and address of the Superior Court's local branch, which will direct the purchaser to contact that court. In contrast, a notice of traffic violation generated by the police will omit court information, using statements like "This is not a notice to appear" and "Do not forward this information to the Court."] Running a red light on a hospital drive can cost up to $2,000.

How To Tell If You Ran a Red Light Camera?

How Do Cameras Work?



How Long Does It Take to Receive a Ticket? 

If the camera takes a picture of your license plate and driver, a qualified officer checks the photo and ensures that you were actually running the red light. A ticket (ranging from $50 $500) will be sent to the address indicated on the vehicle's registration within around 5-7 business days.

Is This a Red Light Camera?

Many drivers mistook red light cameras for traffic cameras.  Read our blog post and see our red light cameras map for the type of camera at an intersection.

What do red light cameras look like?

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

Red Light Camera vs Traffic Camera

Anaheim Voters Banned Red Light Cameras: What This Means

In a significant move reflecting public sentiment toward traffic enforcement technology, Anaheim voters have decisively voted to ban red light cameras in their city. This decision has sparked discussions about traffic safety, law enforcement practices, and the effectiveness of automated ticketing systems. In this article, we’ll explore the implications of this ban and what it means for residents and visitors in Anaheim.

Understanding the Decision

On [insert specific date, if known], Anaheim residents participated in a referendum that led to the prohibition of red light cameras at intersections throughout the city. This decision was driven by a growing sentiment among voters that red light cameras may not effectively enhance traffic safety, and concerns over the perceived fairness of automated enforcement.

Key Factors Influencing the Ban

1. Public Sentiment: Many residents expressed frustration over red light camera tickets, citing a belief that these systems primarily generate revenue for the city rather than enhance safety. This sentiment resonated with voters, prompting a push for change.

2. Effectiveness of Red Light Cameras: Proponents of the ban argued that studies have produced mixed results regarding the effectiveness of red light cameras in reducing accidents. Critics of the cameras pointed to evidence suggesting that they can lead to rear-end collisions as drivers slam on their brakes to avoid a ticket.

3. Financial Implications: The revenue generated from red light camera fines often contributes to city budgets. However, many voters felt that the financial burden on drivers outweighed any potential safety benefits.

What the Ban Means for Anaheim Residents

Changes to Traffic Enforcement

With the ban on red light cameras, traffic enforcement in Anaheim will return to traditional methods. This means that police officers will be responsible for monitoring traffic violations at intersections, rather than relying on automated systems. Residents can expect increased police presence in some areas to ensure compliance with traffic laws.

Impacts on Traffic Safety

The decision to ban red light cameras raises questions about the future of traffic safety in Anaheim. While some residents welcome the change, others worry about the potential for increased violations at intersections previously monitored by cameras.

Community Engagement

The ban on red light cameras highlights the importance of community engagement in local governance. Residents who feel strongly about traffic safety and enforcement are encouraged to participate in discussions and advocate for measures that align with their views. This can include community meetings, public forums, and outreach to city officials.

Alternatives to Red Light Cameras

As Anaheim transitions away from red light cameras, discussions about alternative measures to enhance traffic safety are likely to take center stage. Potential alternatives include:

1. Increased Police Presence: More frequent traffic patrols can help deter violations and improve compliance with traffic laws.

2. Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating drivers about safe driving practices and the consequences of traffic violations can promote a culture of safety on the roads.

3. Improved Traffic Signal Design: Enhancing traffic signals and signage at intersections can help reduce confusion and improve safety for all road users.

4. Community Traffic Safety Initiatives: Encouraging local organizations to develop traffic safety programs can engage the community and foster safer driving behaviors.

Conclusion

The decision by Anaheim voters to ban red light cameras marks a significant shift in the city’s approach to traffic enforcement. As the community navigates this change, it will be essential to prioritize safety and explore alternative measures to ensure that Anaheim remains a safe place for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists alike. Engaging in open dialogue and collaboration among residents, local authorities, and traffic safety advocates will play a crucial role in shaping the future of traffic management in Anaheim.

Understanding Parking Tickets for Street Sweeping

The California Legislature Intends to Allow Street-Sweeper Automated Enforcement Systems: Assembly Bill 2567-blog submitted by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets. The intent of this bill introduced by Assembly Member Bradford this year is to allow a parking citation for a street-sweeping violation to be issued, much like a red light camera ticket. The ticket would be mailed to the registered owner of any vehicle parked during designated hours of operation for a street-sweeping parking lane, supposedly unless the vehicle is parked after the street is cleaned (even if this is during the restricted hours). 

Parking Tickets

Parking tickets for street sweeping can be frustrating for drivers who may not realize the importance of following local parking regulations. These tickets are issued to maintain clean streets, enhance public safety, and ensure that city maintenance crews can perform their jobs effectively. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind street sweeping parking tickets, tips to avoid them, and what to do if you receive one.

Why Street Sweeping Is Important

Street sweeping is an essential part of urban maintenance. It helps:

• Keep Streets Clean: Regular street sweeping removes debris, litter, and pollutants that accumulate on roads. This not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of neighborhoods but also contributes to a healthier environment.

• Prevent Pollution: When debris is left on the streets, it can wash into storm drains during rainstorms, leading to pollution in local waterways. Street sweeping helps mitigate this issue.

• Enhance Safety: Clean streets reduce hazards for pedestrians and drivers alike. Removing debris, leaves, and other obstacles can prevent accidents.

Understanding Street Sweeping Regulations

Most cities have designated days and times for street sweeping. During these periods, parking restrictions are usually enforced to ensure that the street is clear for maintenance vehicles. Here’s how these regulations typically work:

1. No Parking Signs: Cities often place signs along streets to inform residents about scheduled street sweeping. These signs indicate the days and times when parking is prohibited.

2. Enforcement: If a vehicle is parked in a designated no-parking area during street sweeping hours, it may be subject to a parking ticket. Enforcement is usually strict to ensure the effectiveness of the street cleaning process.

Tips to Avoid Parking Tickets for Street Sweeping

To avoid receiving a parking ticket for street sweeping, consider the following tips:

1. Know the Schedule: Familiarize yourself with the street sweeping schedule in your neighborhood. Many cities provide this information on their official websites or through local community boards.

2. Check for Signs: Always look for parking restriction signs when you park your vehicle. These signs will indicate if street sweeping is scheduled and when parking is not allowed.

3. Set Reminders: Use your phone or calendar to set reminders for street sweeping days. This can help you remember to move your vehicle in advance.

4. Park Wisely: If you live in an area with regular street sweeping, try to park in areas where you know parking restrictions are less likely to be enforced, such as private driveways or designated parking lots.

What to Do If You Receive a Parking Ticket

If you find yourself with a parking ticket for street sweeping, here are the steps you can take:

1. Review the Ticket: Carefully read the ticket for details, including the date, time, and location of the violation. Make sure all information is accurate.

2. Check for Signs: Look back at the area where you parked to see if there were clear no-parking signs indicating street sweeping times. This can be crucial if you decide to contest the ticket.

3. Consider Contesting the Ticket: If you believe the ticket was issued in error (for example, if the signage was unclear or missing), you may have the option to contest it. Follow your city’s procedures for appealing a parking ticket, which usually involves submitting a written appeal or attending a hearing.

4. Pay the Fine: If you decide not to contest the ticket, make sure to pay the fine promptly to avoid additional late fees or penalties. Most cities offer online payment options for convenience.

Conclusion

Parking tickets for street sweeping serve an important purpose in maintaining clean and safe streets. By understanding the regulations and staying informed about your local street sweeping schedule, you can avoid unnecessary fines. If you do receive a ticket, carefully assess your options and take appropriate action. Keeping your vehicle clear on street sweeping days not only helps you avoid tickets but also contributes to a cleaner and healthier community for everyone.

Are Cities Required to Use Warning Signs for Photo Enforcement?

Photo enforcement, which includes red light cameras and speed cameras, has become a common method for monitoring traffic violations and enhancing road safety in many cities across the United States. However, a significant question arises: Are cities required to use warning signs for photo enforcement? In this article, we will explore the regulations surrounding photo enforcement signage, the rationale behind their use, and what it means for drivers.

Understanding Photo Enforcement

Photo enforcement refers to the use of automated cameras to capture images of vehicles that violate traffic laws, such as running red lights or exceeding speed limits. These systems have gained popularity as a way to reduce traffic accidents and enforce regulations more efficiently. However, their implementation raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

The Role of Warning Signs

Warning signs play a critical role in informing drivers about photo enforcement measures in place. These signs typically alert motorists to the presence of cameras, ensuring they are aware of potential consequences for violating traffic laws.

Are Warning Signs Legally Required?

The requirement for warning signs related to photo enforcement varies significantly by state and municipality. Here’s an overview of the general landscape:

1. State Regulations: Some states have established laws mandating that cities must post warning signs to inform drivers about the presence of red light and speed cameras. These regulations aim to ensure transparency and reduce the element of surprise when drivers receive tickets.

2. Local Ordinances: Even in states without specific mandates, local municipalities may adopt their own regulations requiring warning signs. This can vary widely depending on the local government's stance on photo enforcement.

3. Best Practices: Many traffic safety advocates recommend the use of warning signs as a best practice, arguing that they enhance driver awareness and compliance with traffic laws. By informing drivers of the presence of cameras, cities can promote safer driving behavior.

Here’s a table summarizing whether warning signs for photo enforcement are required in each state. Keep in mind that regulations can change, and it's essential to check local laws for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

State	Warning Signs Required?
Alabama	No
Alaska	Yes
Arizona	Yes
Arkansas	No
California	Yes
Colorado	Yes
Connecticut	Yes
Delaware	No
District of Columbia	Yes
Florida	Yes
Georgia	No
Hawaii	Yes
Idaho	No
Illinois	Yes
Indiana	No
Iowa	Yes
Kansas	No
Kentucky	No
Louisiana	No
Maine	No
Maryland	Yes
Massachusetts	Yes
Michigan	No
Minnesota	No
Mississippi	No
Missouri	No
Montana	Yes
Nebraska	No
Nevada	Yes
New Hampshire	Yes
New Jersey	Yes
New Mexico	Yes
New York	Yes
North Carolina	Yes
North Dakota	No
Ohio	Yes
Oklahoma	No
Oregon	Yes
Pennsylvania	Yes
Rhode Island	No
South Carolina	Yes
South Dakota	No
Tennessee	Yes
Texas	No
Utah	Yes
Vermont	No
Virginia	Yes
Washington	Yes
West Virginia	No
Wisconsin	No
Wyoming	No

Notes:

• Local Variations: Some states may have local ordinances or municipalities that require warning signs even if the state does not.
• Check for Updates: Always verify with state and local traffic authorities for the most current information regarding photo enforcement and signage requirements.

This table serves as a general guideline and is subject to change based on legislative updates or municipal decisions.

Rationale Behind Warning Signs

The rationale for using warning signs for photo enforcement includes:

• Transparency: Informing drivers about the presence of cameras fosters transparency in traffic enforcement, reducing potential feelings of unfairness or entrapment.

• Safety: Warning signs can encourage drivers to adhere to traffic laws, which ultimately contributes to safer roadways for all users.

• Public Trust: Providing clear communication about enforcement measures can enhance public trust in local government and law enforcement agencies.

The Debate Surrounding Warning Signs

While many support the use of warning signs, there are also arguments against them:

• Effectiveness: Critics argue that the presence of warning signs may lead to drivers only obeying the law when they see a sign, rather than promoting consistent safe driving behavior.

• Revenue Generation: Some believe that requiring warning signs may reduce the effectiveness of photo enforcement systems, as drivers may alter their behavior only when they see the signs, leading to fewer citations and potential revenue loss for municipalities.

Conclusion

Whether cities are required to use warning signs for photo enforcement largely depends on state regulations and local ordinances. While some states mandate their use, others leave the decision to individual municipalities. Regardless of the legal requirements, the presence of warning signs can enhance transparency, promote safer driving habits, and foster public trust in traffic enforcement measures.

For drivers, understanding the regulations surrounding photo enforcement and the use of warning signs is crucial. Staying informed not only helps avoid costly tickets but also contributes to safer roads for everyone. Always check local traffic laws and be aware of your surroundings when driving through areas with photo enforcement.

2010 Court Decision 

People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9, is a recently published case that can be cited and used as precedent (pre-decided cases on the same subject) for all future red light camera tickets, and luckily courts are to adhere to precedent under the legal principle of Stare decisis (not unsettle things which are settled).

Park addresses the issue of warning requirements.

In Park, the defendant was ultimately found not guilty of violating VC§21453 because the photographs depicting the defendant’s vehicle moving through a red light were gathered through an automated enforcement system whereby the issuing City of Santa Ana had not issued warning notices for “each new camera” installed in the city. This published court decision stands for the rule that the issuance of warning notices for the first camera installed in the City, and not for subsequent new cameras, does not satisfy the requirements set forth in VC§21455.5 (b). Typically cities are required to issue a thirty-day warning period which apparently did not happen.

If it comes up at your trial that the city that issued your ticket did not send warning notices for the camera which took your picture or for each new camera installed in the city, only the first one, then be sure to cite this case (case cite is People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9) as the reason why the case against you should be dropped. 

Map of Rochester, New York Red Light Cameras Removed

Map of red light cameras removed in Rochester, NY

Rochester, New York, has removed a red-light camera program. The program aims to improve traffic safety by deterring red-light violations and reducing the number of accidents at intersections. Up to 50 intersections in Rochester, New York have been turned off.

Under the program, cameras were installed at selected intersections throughout the city. These cameras were capable of capturing images and videos of vehicles that run red lights. When a violation occurs, the recorded evidence is reviewed by law enforcement officials to determine if a citation should be issued.

 

How Do You Know If a Red Light Camera A Photo

  

The flash of a red light camera is one of the most dreaded things you can see when you pass an intersection. You may have noticed that if you have been caught red-handed running a stoplight because the camera flash will go off at the intersection.  If you don't see flash chances are you did not run the red light.       

Red-light cameras have a flash that goes off during the daytime or night when a violation is detected to enhance the license plate on the rear of the vehicle.  The camera flash is very bright even during the day.  Some drivers running red lights at night have experienced that these flashes are very startling and you will very easily notice them.  

The flashes can be seen at the front and the rear of the vehicle as the cameras are located on the side of the road.  If you see a flash coming from the traffic light it is most likely not a red light camera.  

The police officer or prosecutor reviewing your photo enforced ticket must be able to provide sufficient evidence to prove that it was you driving the vehicle and the camera was working correctly at the time of recording. 

How long does it take to receive a red light camera ticket in the mail? 

Red light camera ticket, not me driving?

Red light camera or traffic light? 

How Red Light Tickets and Speeding Camera Tickets Affect Insurance?

Cameras May Enforce Texting While Driving

The city of Scottsdale, Arizona may take it a step further and is considering using its photo enforced cameras to enforce distracted driver laws. Photo enforcement cameras in Scottsdale are capable of detecting behavior such as text messaging or other “distracted driving” behavior, in addition to capturing speeders and red-light runners. But whether Scottsdale pursues such enforcement as part of a proposed text-messaging and distracted driving law remains to be seen. “We’re able to see people clearly on their cell phones,” said Josh Weiss, spokesman for American Traffic Solutions, the company that operates the fixed cameras and camera-equipped vans on Scottsdale surface streets.

On September 24th, 2008 the Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 28 (SB 28) into law. The new bill “Prohibits a person from driving a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication." The new bill will impose a fine of $20 for the first offense and $50 for subsequent offenses starting January 1, 2009. No violation points will be given as a result of the offense and there are exceptions for emergency personnel.

The bill requires motorists to use hands-free devices while talking on a mobile phone when driving a motor vehicle. California motorists using cell phones have been required to use hands-free devices since July, and drivers under age 18 can't use any electronic devices. Seven other states and the District of Columbia ban text-messaging or the use of hand-held phones while driving, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

What Do Red Light Cameras Look Like?

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera compared to a traffic light camera

What do red light cameras look like?

Speed Camera Vans Under Attack In Australia

FURIOUS motorists fed up with speed camera fines are turning their anger against operators, intimidating them and even smashing up their cars. The most recent attack last week saw a speed camera operator threatened and a brick thrown through the window of his car as he sat inside. Attacks against operators, speed cameras, and operator vehicles continue to rise. The private company that runs Victoria's speed camera program, Tenix Solutions, has expressed alarm and urged people not to attack operators. Speed cameras generate about $130 million a year for the Australian Government. In 2003, there were eight attacks on fixed-location speed and red light cameras, 23 attacks in 2004, and 39 attacks in 2005.

Red Bank City Council May Dump Cameras

Drivers in Red Bank may be about to breathe a sigh of relief; the town is just one meeting away from getting rid of its much unloved red light cameras. The controversial cameras, which have been labeled as cash-grabbing machines by the general public since their introduction, have fast been losing support from Red Bank’s officials as they apparently put visitors off coming to the city.

Red Bank’s Mayor Milliard said that motorists were choosing to stay away from the city, which has become well-known for its red-light camera installations, for fear of being unfairly ticketed at red lights. Many residents and visitors alike had previously complained to the city council that they were being fined by the over-zealous machines when making honest mistakes or misjudgments driving through traffic signal systems at interchanges. As a result, visitors have said they’d sooner bypass the city of Red Bank, rather than visit it as they did not want to be fined.

“Hurting the city”

Mayor Monty Milliard, who also voted against a 12-year contract extension with American Traffic Solutions in 2010, said that he wanted people to visit Red Bank, not avoid it. "I have had over 100 conversations with residents and business owners, all who say that the cameras are hurting the city.”

Therefore, the Mayor has called for an official vote to cancel Red Bank’s red-light camera contract at the next meeting of the city’s commissioners on September 4. The Mayor has, however, warned the public that, if the vote to remove the cameras is passed, the earliest they can be taken down is the first day of next year. The city authorities would also need to give contractors 90 days notice.

Safety features or cash-grabbers?

It has been seven years since the unpopular red-light cameras were installed into three intersections on Dayton Boulevard (Morrison Springs Road, Signal Mountain Road and Ashland Terrace), the main road serving the city of Red Bank. The cameras, which are owned and run by American Traffic Solutions, were initially intended to act as a safety feature. It was claimed that many drivers were jumping red lights and, as a result, were causing road traffic accidents. The cameras capture photographic evidence of any driver passing through a red light and then issue a fine. However, many drivers have since complained that the cameras are overzealous, often issuing fines unfairly. Cash-strapped motorists have accused the city’s authorities of using them as cash cows, unjustly penalizing them in order to increase revenue.

Milliard, who has been vehemently opposed to the cameras since their 2005 installation, has also confirmed that revenue from fines being issued due to driving infractions has fallen significantly. This is due to a new law passed in 2011 by the Tennessee General Assembly that won’t allow issuing of a ticket for failing to come to a complete stop at a traffic signal before initiating a right turn. Also, a large proportion of the revenue generated from fines is handed over to American Traffic Solutions each month; in 2008-9, Red Bank made just over $579,000 from tickets but handed over around half of that to the Arizona-based company.

Outcome unclear

Whether or not the vote to remove the cameras will be successful or not is unclear. Two commissioners that have long been in favor of the cameras, Floy Pierce and Ruth Jeno, will both be voting. The pair both voted to extend the red light camera contract back in 2010, but could the passing of the new legislation have swayed their opinion?

Removal will be welcome

One thing is for sure, the general public will be echoing Mayor Milliard’s sentiment on the cameras. At a time when the cost of driving is at an all-time high, many people argue that red light cameras raise that cost even higher. Particularly vulnerable are young drivers, who already have higher insurance premiums to cover. Not only are they faced with extortionate fines to pay, but this could also then impact on their driving records, making young drivers insurance harder to obtain. It is clear that a vote next week to remove the city’s cameras will be a welcome piece of news for Red Bank’s drivers.