🚦 Rolling Right Turns: A Hidden Goldmine for Cities?

Are Right Turns on Red Quietly Taxing Drivers?

Facts a Police Officer Must Verify Before Issuing a Ticket

When a police officer pulls over a vehicle, it's not as simple as writing a ticket right away. There are specific facts and legal steps officers must verify before issuing a citation. Understanding these requirements can help drivers protect their rights and avoid unjust penalties.

In this article, we’ll break down the key facts a police officer must confirm before issuing a ticket, whether it’s for speeding, running a red light, illegal parking, or another traffic violation.

1. Probable Cause for the Stop

Before any ticket can be written, a police officer must have probable cause to initiate a traffic stop. This means the officer must observe a clear violation of traffic law or have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.

Examples of Probable Cause:

• Speeding over the posted limit (measured with radar or LIDAR)

• Failing to stop at a stop sign or red light

• Weaving between lanes (possible DUI)

• Expired registration or visible vehicle defects (e.g., broken tail light)

2. Driver Identification

Once the vehicle is stopped, the officer must verify the identity of the driver. This includes checking:

• Valid driver’s license

• Vehicle registration

• Proof of insurance

If any of these documents are missing, expired, or fraudulent, the officer may issue additional citations beyond the initial reason for the stop.

3. Accurate Speed Measurement (for Speeding Tickets)

For speeding tickets, officers must have clear and accurate evidence of the driver’s speed. This is typically done using:

• Radar guns

• LIDAR systems

• Pacing (using the officer’s own speedometer while following the car)

• Speed cameras (in jurisdictions where they are legal)

Officers are also required to be trained and certified to use speed detection equipment. Malfunctioning or uncalibrated devices can lead to a ticket being dismissed in court.

4. Clear Signage and Road Markings

Officers must ensure that traffic laws were violated in a clearly marked zone. For example:

• Speed limits must be posted at regular intervals

• No-parking zones must be clearly signed

• Stop signs and traffic signals must be visible and unobstructed

If signage is missing, obscured, or incorrect, a driver may be able to contest the ticket successfully.

5. Legal Authority and Jurisdiction

A police officer must have the jurisdiction and authority to enforce traffic laws in the location where the violation occurred. For example, a campus security officer cannot issue state traffic tickets unless granted specific authority.

6. Documented Evidence

In many cases, especially when drivers contest tickets, courts require that officers provide:

• Written notes or dashcam/bodycam footage

• Accurate time and location of the offense

• Description of the vehicle and driver’s behavior

This documentation helps ensure tickets are based on facts, not assumptions.

7. Driver’s Right to Explanation

Though not a requirement for issuing a ticket, police are expected to allow the driver a chance to explain. This can sometimes lead to a warning instead of a citation, especially for minor infractions.

Final Thoughts

Traffic tickets are legal documents, and police officers must verify multiple facts before they can be lawfully issued. If any of these elements are missing, the ticket may be invalid or subject to dismissal in court.

Understanding your rights and the legal obligations of law enforcement can help you make informed decisions during traffic stops. If you believe a ticket was issued without proper verification, consider consulting a traffic attorney or contesting it in court.

Updated Red Light and Speed Camera Fine Information by State

As a driver, understanding the laws and fines associated with red light cameras and speed cameras is crucial for maintaining good driving habits and avoiding unexpected expenses. This article provides an updated overview of the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations across the United States. Please note that these fines can vary by municipality, so it’s essential to check local regulations for the most accurate information.

Red Light Camera Fines and Points

The table below summarizes the current fines and points for red light camera violations in each state:

State	Red Light Camera Fine ($)	Red Light Camera Points
Alabama	$100	No Points
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	No Programs	-
California	$490	1 Point
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	$75-$230	-
District of Columbia	$150	0 to 2 Points
Florida	$200	-
Georgia	$70	No Points
Hawaii	$77	-
Illinois	$100-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	$100-$140	No Points
Maryland	$100	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	$100	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	$85	No Points
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$50-$100	No Points
North Carolina	$50-$100	3 Points
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$260-$1,000	-
Pennsylvania	$100	No Points
Rhode Island	$75	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	State Ban	-
Virginia	$100-$200	0 to 4 Points
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Speed Camera Fines and Points

In addition to red light cameras, many states also have speed camera programs. Below is a summary of speed camera fines and points across the states:

State	Speed Camera Fine ($)	Speed Camera Points
Alabama	-	-
Arizona	$165-$250	2 Points
Arkansas	-	-
California	-	-
Colorado	$40-$80	4 Points
Delaware	-	-
District of Columbia	$50-$300	0, 3, 4, 5 Points
Florida	-	-
Georgia	-	-
Hawaii	-	-
Illinois	$250-$500	20 Points
Indiana	No Programs	-
Iowa	$45-$150	-
Kansas	No Programs	-
Louisiana	-	-
Maryland	$40-$1,000	No Points
Michigan	No Programs	-
Minnesota	No Programs	-
Mississippi	No Programs	-
Missouri	-	-
Nevada	No Programs	-
New Jersey	-	-
New Mexico	$75	-
New York	$90-$1,200	No Points (Possible Jail Time)
North Carolina	-	-
Ohio	$100-$200	-
Oklahoma	No Programs	-
Oregon	$110-$2,000	-
Pennsylvania	-	-
Rhode Island	-	-
South Dakota	No Programs	-
Tennessee	$50	No Points
Texas	-	-
Virginia	-	-
Washington	$124-$250	No Points
West Virginia	No Programs	-
Wisconsin	No Programs	-

Important Notes

• Local Variations: Keep in mind that this information can vary widely by municipality within each state. It’s essential to verify specific details with local laws or law enforcement agencies.

• Changes in Regulations: Traffic laws and fines can change frequently. Drivers should regularly check for updates in their state or locality to stay informed.

• Safe Driving Practices: To avoid the potential of incurring fines or points on your license, always adhere to traffic signals and speed limits, and practice safe driving habits.

By understanding the fines and points associated with red light and speed camera violations in your state, you can better navigate the roads and make informed decisions as a driver. Always stay updated on your local traffic laws to ensure a safe and compliant driving experience.

If Red Light Cameras Are Shut Down, Do You Still Have to Pay Tickets?

Many cities across the U.S. are rethinking the use of red light and speed cameras, leading some to shut down their automated traffic enforcement systems. If you receive a ticket from a camera system that is later turned off, you may wonder if you’re still responsible for paying the fine. This guide explains what happens to tickets when cameras are shut down and how the rules may vary depending on your location.

Why Are Some Cities Shutting Down Traffic Cameras?

Red light and speed cameras have been a controversial enforcement tool. While some argue they improve safety and reduce accidents, others criticize them for prioritizing revenue over safety and being prone to technical errors. Common reasons for shutting down traffic cameras include:

• Legal Challenges: Lawsuits and legal challenges have questioned the legality of some camera programs.
• Public Pressure: Public opposition has led some cities to discontinue their programs, especially if residents believe the cameras are unfair or ineffective.
• Cost of Maintenance: Some cities find that maintaining the cameras is too costly relative to the revenue generated, especially if they are required to make regular updates to stay compliant.

Do You Still Have to Pay for a Ticket If Cameras Are Turned Off?

If the cameras are shut down after your ticket was issued, whether or not you have to pay depends on a few factors:

1. Date of Ticket Issuance: Most cities require drivers to pay fines for tickets that were issued while the cameras were still active, regardless of whether they are later turned off. This is because the ticket was legally valid at the time it was issued.

2. Local and State Laws: Some states have laws specifying that all tickets issued prior to a program’s shutdown remain enforceable, while other areas may offer amnesty or dismiss tickets following camera shutdowns, especially if there were legal issues involved.

3. Ticket Dismissal Policies: In certain cases, cities or courts may choose to dismiss outstanding tickets if they determine that the cameras were improperly managed or did not meet legal standards.

What Happens if You Ignore a Ticket from a Shut-Down Camera?

Ignoring a ticket, even if the cameras have been turned off, can lead to further consequences. Possible outcomes of ignoring the ticket include:

• Increased Fines and Late Fees: Unpaid tickets often accrue late fees or additional penalties, which increase the total amount due.
• License Suspension or Points: In some states, unpaid traffic tickets can lead to license suspension or points on your driving record.
• Credit Score Impact: Some jurisdictions turn unpaid traffic tickets over to collections, which can impact your credit score.

It’s essential to confirm whether you are still responsible for payment before assuming a ticket is void, as consequences may vary by jurisdiction.

Steps to Take If You Receive a Ticket and the Camera Is Later Shut Down

1. Check Local Laws and Policies: Each state and city has different rules regarding ticket enforcement after camera shutdowns. Look up your local DMV or traffic court’s policies, or contact them directly for clarification.

2. Consult Legal Help: If you believe the ticket was issued unfairly or if you think there is a legal basis for dismissal, consulting a traffic attorney may be beneficial, especially if there were known issues with the camera program.

3. Look for Potential Refunds or Amnesty Programs: In rare cases, cities have offered refunds or amnesty for tickets issued by systems that were later shut down. Keep an eye on news updates or city announcements.

Examples of Cities That Shut Down Traffic Cameras and the Impact on Tickets

Some cities have discontinued their traffic camera programs and handled ticket enforcement differently. For example:

• Houston, Texas: After Houston voters rejected the city’s red light camera program, the city ultimately turned off the cameras. However, drivers were still responsible for paying tickets issued while the cameras were operational.
• Los Angeles, California: Los Angeles ceased its red light camera program in 2011, but all unpaid tickets before the shutdown were treated as non-enforceable, and drivers with unpaid tickets faced no penalties.

Final Thoughts

Receiving a ticket from a camera that’s later turned off can be confusing, but ignoring it isn’t necessarily the best course of action. Generally, tickets issued before a program’s shutdown remain legally valid. Be sure to review local laws, check for any changes to enforcement policies, and consider consulting a traffic attorney if you have questions. By staying informed, you can navigate the process and avoid unnecessary penalties or fees.

Anaheim Voters Banned Red Light Cameras: What This Means

In a significant move reflecting public sentiment toward traffic enforcement technology, Anaheim voters have decisively voted to ban red light cameras in their city. This decision has sparked discussions about traffic safety, law enforcement practices, and the effectiveness of automated ticketing systems. In this article, we’ll explore the implications of this ban and what it means for residents and visitors in Anaheim.

Understanding the Decision

On [insert specific date, if known], Anaheim residents participated in a referendum that led to the prohibition of red light cameras at intersections throughout the city. This decision was driven by a growing sentiment among voters that red light cameras may not effectively enhance traffic safety, and concerns over the perceived fairness of automated enforcement.

Key Factors Influencing the Ban

1. Public Sentiment: Many residents expressed frustration over red light camera tickets, citing a belief that these systems primarily generate revenue for the city rather than enhance safety. This sentiment resonated with voters, prompting a push for change.

2. Effectiveness of Red Light Cameras: Proponents of the ban argued that studies have produced mixed results regarding the effectiveness of red light cameras in reducing accidents. Critics of the cameras pointed to evidence suggesting that they can lead to rear-end collisions as drivers slam on their brakes to avoid a ticket.

3. Financial Implications: The revenue generated from red light camera fines often contributes to city budgets. However, many voters felt that the financial burden on drivers outweighed any potential safety benefits.

What the Ban Means for Anaheim Residents

Changes to Traffic Enforcement

With the ban on red light cameras, traffic enforcement in Anaheim will return to traditional methods. This means that police officers will be responsible for monitoring traffic violations at intersections, rather than relying on automated systems. Residents can expect increased police presence in some areas to ensure compliance with traffic laws.

Impacts on Traffic Safety

The decision to ban red light cameras raises questions about the future of traffic safety in Anaheim. While some residents welcome the change, others worry about the potential for increased violations at intersections previously monitored by cameras.

Community Engagement

The ban on red light cameras highlights the importance of community engagement in local governance. Residents who feel strongly about traffic safety and enforcement are encouraged to participate in discussions and advocate for measures that align with their views. This can include community meetings, public forums, and outreach to city officials.

Alternatives to Red Light Cameras

As Anaheim transitions away from red light cameras, discussions about alternative measures to enhance traffic safety are likely to take center stage. Potential alternatives include:

1. Increased Police Presence: More frequent traffic patrols can help deter violations and improve compliance with traffic laws.

2. Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating drivers about safe driving practices and the consequences of traffic violations can promote a culture of safety on the roads.

3. Improved Traffic Signal Design: Enhancing traffic signals and signage at intersections can help reduce confusion and improve safety for all road users.

4. Community Traffic Safety Initiatives: Encouraging local organizations to develop traffic safety programs can engage the community and foster safer driving behaviors.

Conclusion

The decision by Anaheim voters to ban red light cameras marks a significant shift in the city’s approach to traffic enforcement. As the community navigates this change, it will be essential to prioritize safety and explore alternative measures to ensure that Anaheim remains a safe place for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists alike. Engaging in open dialogue and collaboration among residents, local authorities, and traffic safety advocates will play a crucial role in shaping the future of traffic management in Anaheim.

Understanding Parking Tickets for Street Sweeping

The California Legislature Intends to Allow Street-Sweeper Automated Enforcement Systems: Assembly Bill 2567-blog submitted by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets. The intent of this bill introduced by Assembly Member Bradford this year is to allow a parking citation for a street-sweeping violation to be issued, much like a red light camera ticket. The ticket would be mailed to the registered owner of any vehicle parked during designated hours of operation for a street-sweeping parking lane, supposedly unless the vehicle is parked after the street is cleaned (even if this is during the restricted hours). 

Parking Tickets

Parking tickets for street sweeping can be frustrating for drivers who may not realize the importance of following local parking regulations. These tickets are issued to maintain clean streets, enhance public safety, and ensure that city maintenance crews can perform their jobs effectively. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind street sweeping parking tickets, tips to avoid them, and what to do if you receive one.

Why Street Sweeping Is Important

Street sweeping is an essential part of urban maintenance. It helps:

• Keep Streets Clean: Regular street sweeping removes debris, litter, and pollutants that accumulate on roads. This not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of neighborhoods but also contributes to a healthier environment.

• Prevent Pollution: When debris is left on the streets, it can wash into storm drains during rainstorms, leading to pollution in local waterways. Street sweeping helps mitigate this issue.

• Enhance Safety: Clean streets reduce hazards for pedestrians and drivers alike. Removing debris, leaves, and other obstacles can prevent accidents.

Understanding Street Sweeping Regulations

Most cities have designated days and times for street sweeping. During these periods, parking restrictions are usually enforced to ensure that the street is clear for maintenance vehicles. Here’s how these regulations typically work:

1. No Parking Signs: Cities often place signs along streets to inform residents about scheduled street sweeping. These signs indicate the days and times when parking is prohibited.

2. Enforcement: If a vehicle is parked in a designated no-parking area during street sweeping hours, it may be subject to a parking ticket. Enforcement is usually strict to ensure the effectiveness of the street cleaning process.

Tips to Avoid Parking Tickets for Street Sweeping

To avoid receiving a parking ticket for street sweeping, consider the following tips:

1. Know the Schedule: Familiarize yourself with the street sweeping schedule in your neighborhood. Many cities provide this information on their official websites or through local community boards.

2. Check for Signs: Always look for parking restriction signs when you park your vehicle. These signs will indicate if street sweeping is scheduled and when parking is not allowed.

3. Set Reminders: Use your phone or calendar to set reminders for street sweeping days. This can help you remember to move your vehicle in advance.

4. Park Wisely: If you live in an area with regular street sweeping, try to park in areas where you know parking restrictions are less likely to be enforced, such as private driveways or designated parking lots.

What to Do If You Receive a Parking Ticket

If you find yourself with a parking ticket for street sweeping, here are the steps you can take:

1. Review the Ticket: Carefully read the ticket for details, including the date, time, and location of the violation. Make sure all information is accurate.

2. Check for Signs: Look back at the area where you parked to see if there were clear no-parking signs indicating street sweeping times. This can be crucial if you decide to contest the ticket.

3. Consider Contesting the Ticket: If you believe the ticket was issued in error (for example, if the signage was unclear or missing), you may have the option to contest it. Follow your city’s procedures for appealing a parking ticket, which usually involves submitting a written appeal or attending a hearing.

4. Pay the Fine: If you decide not to contest the ticket, make sure to pay the fine promptly to avoid additional late fees or penalties. Most cities offer online payment options for convenience.

Conclusion

Parking tickets for street sweeping serve an important purpose in maintaining clean and safe streets. By understanding the regulations and staying informed about your local street sweeping schedule, you can avoid unnecessary fines. If you do receive a ticket, carefully assess your options and take appropriate action. Keeping your vehicle clear on street sweeping days not only helps you avoid tickets but also contributes to a cleaner and healthier community for everyone.

Are Cities Required to Use Warning Signs for Photo Enforcement?

Photo enforcement, which includes red light cameras and speed cameras, has become a common method for monitoring traffic violations and enhancing road safety in many cities across the United States. However, a significant question arises: Are cities required to use warning signs for photo enforcement? In this article, we will explore the regulations surrounding photo enforcement signage, the rationale behind their use, and what it means for drivers.

Understanding Photo Enforcement

Photo enforcement refers to the use of automated cameras to capture images of vehicles that violate traffic laws, such as running red lights or exceeding speed limits. These systems have gained popularity as a way to reduce traffic accidents and enforce regulations more efficiently. However, their implementation raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

The Role of Warning Signs

Warning signs play a critical role in informing drivers about photo enforcement measures in place. These signs typically alert motorists to the presence of cameras, ensuring they are aware of potential consequences for violating traffic laws.

Are Warning Signs Legally Required?

The requirement for warning signs related to photo enforcement varies significantly by state and municipality. Here’s an overview of the general landscape:

1. State Regulations: Some states have established laws mandating that cities must post warning signs to inform drivers about the presence of red light and speed cameras. These regulations aim to ensure transparency and reduce the element of surprise when drivers receive tickets.

2. Local Ordinances: Even in states without specific mandates, local municipalities may adopt their own regulations requiring warning signs. This can vary widely depending on the local government's stance on photo enforcement.

3. Best Practices: Many traffic safety advocates recommend the use of warning signs as a best practice, arguing that they enhance driver awareness and compliance with traffic laws. By informing drivers of the presence of cameras, cities can promote safer driving behavior.

Here’s a table summarizing whether warning signs for photo enforcement are required in each state. Keep in mind that regulations can change, and it's essential to check local laws for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

State	Warning Signs Required?
Alabama	No
Alaska	Yes
Arizona	Yes
Arkansas	No
California	Yes
Colorado	Yes
Connecticut	Yes
Delaware	No
District of Columbia	Yes
Florida	Yes
Georgia	No
Hawaii	Yes
Idaho	No
Illinois	Yes
Indiana	No
Iowa	Yes
Kansas	No
Kentucky	No
Louisiana	No
Maine	No
Maryland	Yes
Massachusetts	Yes
Michigan	No
Minnesota	No
Mississippi	No
Missouri	No
Montana	Yes
Nebraska	No
Nevada	Yes
New Hampshire	Yes
New Jersey	Yes
New Mexico	Yes
New York	Yes
North Carolina	Yes
North Dakota	No
Ohio	Yes
Oklahoma	No
Oregon	Yes
Pennsylvania	Yes
Rhode Island	No
South Carolina	Yes
South Dakota	No
Tennessee	Yes
Texas	No
Utah	Yes
Vermont	No
Virginia	Yes
Washington	Yes
West Virginia	No
Wisconsin	No
Wyoming	No

Notes:

• Local Variations: Some states may have local ordinances or municipalities that require warning signs even if the state does not.
• Check for Updates: Always verify with state and local traffic authorities for the most current information regarding photo enforcement and signage requirements.

This table serves as a general guideline and is subject to change based on legislative updates or municipal decisions.

Rationale Behind Warning Signs

The rationale for using warning signs for photo enforcement includes:

• Transparency: Informing drivers about the presence of cameras fosters transparency in traffic enforcement, reducing potential feelings of unfairness or entrapment.

• Safety: Warning signs can encourage drivers to adhere to traffic laws, which ultimately contributes to safer roadways for all users.

• Public Trust: Providing clear communication about enforcement measures can enhance public trust in local government and law enforcement agencies.

The Debate Surrounding Warning Signs

While many support the use of warning signs, there are also arguments against them:

• Effectiveness: Critics argue that the presence of warning signs may lead to drivers only obeying the law when they see a sign, rather than promoting consistent safe driving behavior.

• Revenue Generation: Some believe that requiring warning signs may reduce the effectiveness of photo enforcement systems, as drivers may alter their behavior only when they see the signs, leading to fewer citations and potential revenue loss for municipalities.

Conclusion

Whether cities are required to use warning signs for photo enforcement largely depends on state regulations and local ordinances. While some states mandate their use, others leave the decision to individual municipalities. Regardless of the legal requirements, the presence of warning signs can enhance transparency, promote safer driving habits, and foster public trust in traffic enforcement measures.

For drivers, understanding the regulations surrounding photo enforcement and the use of warning signs is crucial. Staying informed not only helps avoid costly tickets but also contributes to safer roads for everyone. Always check local traffic laws and be aware of your surroundings when driving through areas with photo enforcement.

2010 Court Decision 

People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9, is a recently published case that can be cited and used as precedent (pre-decided cases on the same subject) for all future red light camera tickets, and luckily courts are to adhere to precedent under the legal principle of Stare decisis (not unsettle things which are settled).

Park addresses the issue of warning requirements.

In Park, the defendant was ultimately found not guilty of violating VC§21453 because the photographs depicting the defendant’s vehicle moving through a red light were gathered through an automated enforcement system whereby the issuing City of Santa Ana had not issued warning notices for “each new camera” installed in the city. This published court decision stands for the rule that the issuance of warning notices for the first camera installed in the City, and not for subsequent new cameras, does not satisfy the requirements set forth in VC§21455.5 (b). Typically cities are required to issue a thirty-day warning period which apparently did not happen.

If it comes up at your trial that the city that issued your ticket did not send warning notices for the camera which took your picture or for each new camera installed in the city, only the first one, then be sure to cite this case (case cite is People v. Park (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th Supp. 9) as the reason why the case against you should be dropped. 

Map of Rochester, New York Red Light Cameras Removed

Map of red light cameras removed in Rochester, NY

Rochester, New York, has removed a red-light camera program. The program aims to improve traffic safety by deterring red-light violations and reducing the number of accidents at intersections. Up to 50 intersections in Rochester, New York have been turned off.

Under the program, cameras were installed at selected intersections throughout the city. These cameras were capable of capturing images and videos of vehicles that run red lights. When a violation occurs, the recorded evidence is reviewed by law enforcement officials to determine if a citation should be issued.

 

Red Light Camera Warning Signs

Ever wonder why there are warning signs for red-light cameras at some intersections but not all? According to VC§ 21455.5(a) (1), “Warning signs must be posted at each camera-equipped intersection and visible to traffic approaching from all directions, or at all the main entrances to town including, at a minimum, freeways, bridges, and state highway routes." The purpose of the law is obviously to make sure that drivers are warned in all instances where there is red light camera enforcement, and the seemingly most obvious way to warn a driver is to post a warning sign say overhead on a traffic signal head, but the law doesn’t require it.

The law does require that warning signs be posted, but the law gives cities the choice in where to post the signs and the law is vague as to how CLOSE to the intersection the signs have to be posted (provided the city decides to post the signs at the intersection). According to the Cal Trans design, the signs must be at least 30 inches wide by 40 inches high and 6 feet off the ground but there is no requirement as to the distance a sign must be posted in relation to an intersection. Warning signs will not always be posted right at an intersection so drivers should be on the lookout for such signs when entering a city or exiting from a freeway off-ramp. If you do get a red light photo ticket you should go back and search for warning signs and if you can’t find anywhere they are supposed to be or the signs are there but they are not the right size or are blocked or damaged in such a way that they are not visible, then take photographs so you can dispute the ticket. If the signs weren’t posted in accordance with the law (VC§ 21455.5(a) (1) ) then as a result you weren’t given the required notice and more importantly, a foundational requirement (warning signs) for the camera enforcement system is lacking. - blog Submitted by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

Related articles: 

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

What Is A Red Light Camera?

Red light cameras are designed to take images of vehicles approaching a particular intersection after the traffic light turns red. You are definitely safe if you reach the intersection before the light turns red. Entering the intersection means that when the light is red and turning red the front tires are completely across the white line. If you are crossing the white line when the light is red it will be a ticket. 

By automatically photographing cars running red lights, the photograph is proof that helps police enforce traffic laws. Generally, when a car approaches the intersection (passes the stop bar), the camera is activated after the traffic signal has turned red.

Typically, a law enforcement official will review the photographic evidence and determine whether a violation occurred. A citation is then usually mailed to the owner of the vehicle found to be in violation of the law. These cameras are used worldwide, in China, in European countries, and in countries including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Indonesia, the United Kingdom, Singapore, and the United States. More than 75 countries worldwide use red-light cameras.

If a correct identification can not be made, some police departments may give the vehicle's owner a notice of violation instead of a citation, demanding the identifying details so that a citation can be given later.

Red light cameras are usually mounted at intersections in secure metal boxes fixed to poles (different from the radar weapons carried by police officers) and are most explicitly selected due to high levels of collisions and/or red-light violations. Red light camera systems usually use two inductive loops that are closely spaced and embedded in the pavement just before the limit line to determine vehicle speed. Using the calculated speed, the machine determines whether a single vehicle can not stop before approaching the intersection, and takes two photographs of the occurrence. The first photo shows the vehicle just before it enters the intersection, with the light showing red, and the second photo, taken a second or two later, shows the vehicle when it is at the intersection.

Details that could be captured by the camera system (and subsequently shown to the vehicle owner) include the date and time, the position, the speed of the vehicle, and the amount of time that has elapsed since the light turned red and the vehicle crossed into the intersection. The incident is recorded as a series of photos or a video clip, or both, depending on the equipment used, which shows the vehicle before approaching the intersection on a red light signal and its progress through the intersection. Data and videos, whether digital or film-developed, are submitted to the appropriate law enforcement authority.

Studies have shown that 38% of violations occur within 0.25 seconds of turning red light and 79% within a second. A few red light camera systems allow a "grace period" of up to half a second for drivers driving through the intersection just as the light turns red. 

Ohio and Georgia adopted a law requiring one second to be applied to the regular yellow time of every intersection that has a red light camera, leading to a reduction in tickets of 80 percent since its launch.  New Jersey has the most stringent yellow timing rules in the world due to fears that cameras will be used to raise revenue; they have a law requiring that the yellow time for an intersection with a red light camera must be focused on the speed at which 85 percent of road traffic travels, rather than on the actual speed limit of road traffic.

Notice of Violation 

In certain police departments in California, where a definitive identification can not be made, the vehicle's registered owner will be issued a traffic violation warning instead of a real ticket. Often known as "snitch tickets" these documents are used during the suspected infringement to request identity information about the vehicle's driver.  Since these notices were not filed in court, they hold no legal weight and there is no duty on the registered owner to answer. A genuine ticket in California will bear the name and address of the Superior Court's local branch, which will direct the purchaser to contact that court. In contrast, a notice of traffic violation generated by the police will omit court information, using statements like "This is not a notice to appear" and "Do not forward this information to the Court."] Running a red light on a hospital drive can cost up to $2,000.

How To Tell If You Ran a Red Light Camera?

How Do Cameras Work?



How Long Does It Take to Receive a Ticket? 

If the camera takes a picture of your license plate and driver, a qualified officer checks the photo and ensures that you were actually running the red light. A ticket (ranging from $50 $500) will be sent to the address indicated on the vehicle's registration within around 5-7 business days.

Is This a Red Light Camera?

Many drivers mistook red light cameras for traffic cameras.  Read our blog post and see our red light cameras map for the type of camera at an intersection.

What do red light cameras look like?

Photo Enforced Sign Meaning

Red Light Camera vs Traffic Camera

How Do You Know If a Red Light Camera A Photo

  

The flash of a red light camera is one of the most dreaded things you can see when you pass an intersection. You may have noticed that if you have been caught red-handed running a stoplight because the camera flash will go off at the intersection.  If you don't see flash chances are you did not run the red light.       

Red-light cameras have a flash that goes off during the daytime or night when a violation is detected to enhance the license plate on the rear of the vehicle.  The camera flash is very bright even during the day.  Some drivers running red lights at night have experienced that these flashes are very startling and you will very easily notice them.  

The flashes can be seen at the front and the rear of the vehicle as the cameras are located on the side of the road.  If you see a flash coming from the traffic light it is most likely not a red light camera.  

The police officer or prosecutor reviewing your photo enforced ticket must be able to provide sufficient evidence to prove that it was you driving the vehicle and the camera was working correctly at the time of recording. 

How long does it take to receive a red light camera ticket in the mail? 

Red light camera ticket, not me driving?

Red light camera or traffic light? 

How Red Light Tickets and Speeding Camera Tickets Affect Insurance?

Snitch Tickets

Don't tattle on a friend or a family member for driving your 

What if you receive a red light camera ticket, and the driver wasn't you?

Red light camera tickets cost about $500 per ticket in California and a point on your license. Since the tickets add a point to your license, the police must obtain the name of the actual driver before they can file the ticket at court. Since the photo of the license plate will only lead to the registered owner ("RO"), and often he/she is not the person driving the car. The police will go to great lengths to get registered owners to identify who was driving the car that was ticketed. Technicians reviewing the photos will check to see if the pictured driver is obviously not the registered owner (male/female mismatch, age difference, or a rental car). Sometimes the photo is too blurry to identify who it is and will send the registered owner an official-looking notice telling him that he must identify the driver. About 40 California police departments will mail out Snitch Tickets to fool the registered owner into identifying the actual driver of the car.

 Are Traffic Cameras Legal In Los Angeles, California?

Snitch Tickets have not been filed with the court, so are recognizable because they don't say "Notice to Appear," don't have the court's address, and say (on the back, in small letters), "Do not contact the court." Since they have NOT been filed with the court, they have no legal weight. You can ignore a Snitch Ticket. Snitch Tickets are designed to look like a real ticket but are legally very different. Real tickets and Snitch Tickets both ask the registered owner to turn in or identify the person who was driving the car. Despite all that, there are some differences that you can rely on. One of the best ways to identify a Snitch Ticket is the small print on the back of the page, "Do not contact the court about this notice." Snitch Tickets will also lack any wording directing you to contact or "Respond to" the court. In fact, on a typical Snitch Ticket, there is no phone number for the court, and the court's address is usually missing or incomplete. (Please note, however, that in some towns the real tickets carry an incomplete address.

A real ticket will ask you to contact ("Respond to") the court and you should. If your ticket says this it's likely a real one and you should look it up on the court's website. If it's not on their site, it still could be real. Make sure you are looking on the court's website, not the website of the camera operator Redflex (PhotoNotice) or ATS's. Your ticket is real if you have received a Courtesy Notice and it asks you to contact the court. Please note that your ticket could be real even if the court's phone number is missing and its address is incomplete. This is often the case because some cities are leaving this information off their real tickets to make it harder for defendants to fight their tickets in court.

Read more about how to do a trial by written declaration. 

Cameras May Enforce Texting While Driving

The city of Scottsdale, Arizona may take it a step further and is considering using its photo enforced cameras to enforce distracted driver laws. Photo enforcement cameras in Scottsdale are capable of detecting behavior such as text messaging or other “distracted driving” behavior, in addition to capturing speeders and red-light runners. But whether Scottsdale pursues such enforcement as part of a proposed text-messaging and distracted driving law remains to be seen. “We’re able to see people clearly on their cell phones,” said Josh Weiss, spokesman for American Traffic Solutions, the company that operates the fixed cameras and camera-equipped vans on Scottsdale surface streets.

On September 24th, 2008 the Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 28 (SB 28) into law. The new bill “Prohibits a person from driving a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication." The new bill will impose a fine of $20 for the first offense and $50 for subsequent offenses starting January 1, 2009. No violation points will be given as a result of the offense and there are exceptions for emergency personnel.

The bill requires motorists to use hands-free devices while talking on a mobile phone when driving a motor vehicle. California motorists using cell phones have been required to use hands-free devices since July, and drivers under age 18 can't use any electronic devices. Seven other states and the District of Columbia ban text-messaging or the use of hand-held phones while driving, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

What Do Red Light Cameras Look Like?

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera

This is a red light camera compared to a traffic light camera

What do red light cameras look like?

Speed Camera Vans Under Attack In Australia

FURIOUS motorists fed up with speed camera fines are turning their anger against operators, intimidating them and even smashing up their cars. The most recent attack last week saw a speed camera operator threatened and a brick thrown through the window of his car as he sat inside. Attacks against operators, speed cameras, and operator vehicles continue to rise. The private company that runs Victoria's speed camera program, Tenix Solutions, has expressed alarm and urged people not to attack operators. Speed cameras generate about $130 million a year for the Australian Government. In 2003, there were eight attacks on fixed-location speed and red light cameras, 23 attacks in 2004, and 39 attacks in 2005.

Red Bank City Council May Dump Cameras

Drivers in Red Bank may be about to breathe a sigh of relief; the town is just one meeting away from getting rid of its much unloved red light cameras. The controversial cameras, which have been labeled as cash-grabbing machines by the general public since their introduction, have fast been losing support from Red Bank’s officials as they apparently put visitors off coming to the city.

Red Bank’s Mayor Milliard said that motorists were choosing to stay away from the city, which has become well-known for its red-light camera installations, for fear of being unfairly ticketed at red lights. Many residents and visitors alike had previously complained to the city council that they were being fined by the over-zealous machines when making honest mistakes or misjudgments driving through traffic signal systems at interchanges. As a result, visitors have said they’d sooner bypass the city of Red Bank, rather than visit it as they did not want to be fined.

“Hurting the city”

Mayor Monty Milliard, who also voted against a 12-year contract extension with American Traffic Solutions in 2010, said that he wanted people to visit Red Bank, not avoid it. "I have had over 100 conversations with residents and business owners, all who say that the cameras are hurting the city.”

Therefore, the Mayor has called for an official vote to cancel Red Bank’s red-light camera contract at the next meeting of the city’s commissioners on September 4. The Mayor has, however, warned the public that, if the vote to remove the cameras is passed, the earliest they can be taken down is the first day of next year. The city authorities would also need to give contractors 90 days notice.

Safety features or cash-grabbers?

It has been seven years since the unpopular red-light cameras were installed into three intersections on Dayton Boulevard (Morrison Springs Road, Signal Mountain Road and Ashland Terrace), the main road serving the city of Red Bank. The cameras, which are owned and run by American Traffic Solutions, were initially intended to act as a safety feature. It was claimed that many drivers were jumping red lights and, as a result, were causing road traffic accidents. The cameras capture photographic evidence of any driver passing through a red light and then issue a fine. However, many drivers have since complained that the cameras are overzealous, often issuing fines unfairly. Cash-strapped motorists have accused the city’s authorities of using them as cash cows, unjustly penalizing them in order to increase revenue.

Milliard, who has been vehemently opposed to the cameras since their 2005 installation, has also confirmed that revenue from fines being issued due to driving infractions has fallen significantly. This is due to a new law passed in 2011 by the Tennessee General Assembly that won’t allow issuing of a ticket for failing to come to a complete stop at a traffic signal before initiating a right turn. Also, a large proportion of the revenue generated from fines is handed over to American Traffic Solutions each month; in 2008-9, Red Bank made just over $579,000 from tickets but handed over around half of that to the Arizona-based company.

Outcome unclear

Whether or not the vote to remove the cameras will be successful or not is unclear. Two commissioners that have long been in favor of the cameras, Floy Pierce and Ruth Jeno, will both be voting. The pair both voted to extend the red light camera contract back in 2010, but could the passing of the new legislation have swayed their opinion?

Removal will be welcome

One thing is for sure, the general public will be echoing Mayor Milliard’s sentiment on the cameras. At a time when the cost of driving is at an all-time high, many people argue that red light cameras raise that cost even higher. Particularly vulnerable are young drivers, who already have higher insurance premiums to cover. Not only are they faced with extortionate fines to pay, but this could also then impact on their driving records, making young drivers insurance harder to obtain. It is clear that a vote next week to remove the city’s cameras will be a welcome piece of news for Red Bank’s drivers.

Automated Enforcement Citations: Statement of Identification

Unusual Practice Used by Sacramento Superior Court for Those Wanting to Contest a Red Light Camera Ticket in Writing

In California, anyone who receives a ticket for a traffic infraction can have the option to fight the ticket without going to court through a process called a Trial by Written Declaration. This is authorized by the California Vehicle Code, under section 40902 (a) (1). For those who receive a red light camera ticket, contesting the ticket through the mail is a lot more appealing than showing up in person in court where there is an officer with a binder from the camera company who will testify on the workings of the red light camera.

When a person contacts a court to request a Trial by Declaration, the court will send you the necessary state-approved forms for a Trial by Written Declaration (TR-205) and instructions. However if your red light camera ticket is filed with the Superior Court of Sacramento, this court tries to make it more difficult for you to contest your red light ticket with a Trial by Declaration.

The Sacramento Superior Court has a local form called a “Red Light Camera Statement of Identification” which states that “Without admitting guilt, I stipulate that I was the driver of the vehicle pictured in the automated enforcement photograph”. The form itself does not state anywhere that it is mandatory it is filled out, and in fact, the court website even only states, “...please complete the Red Light Camera Statement of Identification” (notice the use of the word please instead of must). However, if you don’t complete this you could receive a notice of non-compliance or ineligibility after filing your Trial by Declaration paperwork and be dropped from the courts Trial by Declaration Calendar.

If you are not allowed to proceed with a Trial by Declaration then your only option is a court trial (outside of just paying the fine and accepting the points going on your record). But what if it is not convenient for you to appear in court because of your work schedule or the distance you live from the court? What if you were not the driver, but do not know who the driver is or you do know who the driver is but don’t want to turn them in? Should you be prevented from using a Trial by Declaration simply because you cannot state under penalty of perjury that you were the driver?

With this unusual practice, the court is essentially saying that in order to avoid being dropped from the Trial by Declaration calendar, you must at least stipulate to one of the elements of the crime (identity – being the driver) which is an element that is supposed to be proved by the police department issuing the ticket, or your case will not be adjudicated (at least not by Trial by Declaration to which you have a right to contest your ticket by under 40902 (a) (1)). This unusual (dare say unfair or unjust) practice has been in use for some time and those who are concerned about the matter might consider writing to or calling the head judge in Sacramento or the head office for all California courts in San Francisco.

Contributed by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

Railroad Crossing Tickets

Motorists Beware Camera Enforcement Systems Can Ticket For More Than Just a Red Light

Whenever someone mentions they got one of those “photo tickets” in the mail, everyone would assume it’s a red light photo ticket. However, a red light violation is not the only thing that Camera Enforcement Systems can be used for.

One should be especially wary at railroad crossings. The vehicle code section governing stops at railroad crossings states in part: “The driver of any vehicle or pedestrian approaching a railroad or rail transit grade crossing shall stop not less than 15 feet from the nearest rail and shall not proceed until he or she can do so safely...”

Furthermore, it states this relating to camera enforcement: “Whenever a railroad or rail transit crossing is equipped with an automated enforcement system, a notice of a violation of this section is subject to the procedures provided in Section 40518.”

What this means, in a nutshell, is that a ticket for failing to stop at a railroad crossing can be mailed to you just like a ticket for failing to stop at a red light, so drive careful you never know who (what?) is watching.

Contributed by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

Traffic Ticket Requested Information of Me

If you receive ticket a notice in the mail issued to you by a police department or even an out of state camera company what you shouldn’t do is freely give them the information requested of you. Oftentimes these notices are sent out to fish for information like your driver’s license number and to get you to tell on yourself (or someone else) for a red light violation.  These are known as snitch tickets.

A red flag should go up if you were not the driver if you don’t see a due date, a fine amount, and if you don’t see a courthouse listed on the notice. If you’re still unsure, check the notice for the city and county where the violation allegedly occurred (this will be on the front side of the notice listed along with information like the location and violation code). You can then go to the Superior court website for that county and many courts allow you to do an online search for your ticket and fine information. You may be able to search by your driver’s license, last name, or violation number. You could also try calling the court you think the ticket would have been issued in and inquire with a traffic clerk as to whether there is a ticket issued to you in their system, most likely there will not be.

If not then, in that case, the ticket hasn’t been filed or registered with the court yet so it’s not an official ticket. Before you just roll over and comply with the first notice, you may want to wait and see if you ever do get a notice from the court, because you may not. If you don’t fill out the back of the first notice and send it back to the agency requesting the information from you then they won’t have enough to pin the ticket on you and get a real ticket issued to you through the court.

If you’re not sure of how to handle a red light photo ticket notice you received, before you do anything, it’s a good idea to consult with a professional who is well seasoned with dealing with red light camera tickets. Remember, a ticket that hasn’t been filed or registered with the court yet is not an official ticket and may never become one if you don’t help them by tattling on yourself.

Contributed by ticketbust.com, helping drivers contest and dismiss their traffic tickets.

How to Tell if You Got a Red Light Camera Ticket

Red light camera tickets typically take from 3-7 business days to process and are mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.  We recommend waiting until the ticket arrives in the mail before trying to find out ahead of time.  Some people just don't have the patience to wait and if the matter is urgent we recommend calling one of the local police departments listed in the directory below or by dialing 311 on your phone.  Please do not dial 911 on your phone as the operator will not accept your call because getting a ticket is not an emergency requiring dispatch.  Unfortunately, most Police departments are not equipped to handle this type of customer service so expect the worst when you take on this endeavor.  You can also try searching the databases of PhotoNotice.com and Atsol.com.   Also, PhotoEnforced.com does not own, operate or run any of the cameras and we are simply a database of the locations.  Please do not email us with questions asking if you received a ticket because we do not currently have any way of verifying them.  

Local Police Phone Number Directory

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois

Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana

Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island

South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming