City’s Surveillance Network: Who Monitors the Data?

The popularity of city surveillance has been on the rise recently. More and more countries choose to make a stand on the usage of security cameras on the streets. However, this issue is as controversial as it is confusing. Many still don’t understand the full list of benefits and dangers that such technology can introduce to nations. Yet, it seems that most people have their strong opinions on the matter. Some claim that such a concept violates everything a democracy should be about, while others believe in the safe future due to the new surveillance technology. Overall, there is a little bit of truth in both of those statements.

However, it is not the cameras that make people argue, but the data that they collect. In the wrong hands, such data can lead to grave consequences. Though, where is the line between helping and harming, and who controls the collected data? Let’s take a closer look at the issues and see who actually monitors the data.

What is city surveillance?

So, before we move on to the further discussion, let’s first define what city surveillance actually is, whether it’s good and how, and mention some of the main arguments around this issue. Overall, this is the system of video registration (security cameras) in public places. Such cameras are installed with the sole purpose of enhancing safety and security in those areas. Some countries are very big on city surveillance, such as the UK, for instance, and some states in the US (mainly for road safety, though). However, the idea of city surveillance is a controversial one.

For example, the opponents of this technology claim that it works against democratic principles. Being constantly watched by the government is not something people are ready to let slide without any resistance. However, a lot is missing in such an approach, like the notion that no one is actually watching the entire population at all times. Surely, the belief in the opposite can cause true paranoia among many. You may even check out some of the nursing writing services reviews, and order a paper on mental health and the role of city surveillance on one’s anxiety and mental state. Such a report will give you a perspective on the issue, too.

Overall, as in many other cases, introducing technologies into public policies comes with some resistance as any other novelty. Yet, the city surveillance network can, indeed, help to reduce crime and react to emergencies more urgently. Of course, such technologies should come with a strong mechanism for legal oversight and the public's ability to review the surveillance on demand. So, let’s see who gets to monitor and control these cameras and when they come in handy.

Who can watch the data from the security cameras?

So, who can watch the data from the security cameras? To put it simply, the government should be the body to manage the surveillance, including giving access to the data, when judicial institutions should be the only legal body to have the right to monitor those public cameras. The access of any third party should be authorized by legal bodies in case there is enough evidence to share the data. However, overall, access to this data should be limited and treated with precariousness and understanding of its value.

Let’s also be clear here. No one is really sitting in a dark room watching thousands upon thousands of monitors at once. That’s not why the city surveillance is here. Instead, there are other methods police and other legal bodies integrate city surveillance into their work routine. For instance, in the case of lack of evidence and witnesses, cameras can be used to document the event of a crime or the lack of such. The face identification features available on most modern surveillance cameras can also significantly enhance police work, yet they have the most controversy around them. Let’s see some of the common worries people have over the safety and usage of city surveillance data.

Is there any harm?

The data collected by the city cameras can carry significant importance. Of course, on the one hand, it can help the police identify criminals, find missing people or stolen cars, and much more. Such positive usage of the collected data is undoubtedly great for the communities, their safety, and overall well-being. However, on the other hand, mistreatment of such data can lead to pretty dire consequences. For example, not democratic states can use city surveillance to monitor, track, and oppress citizens of certain groups of people, like religious or ethnic minorities.

In addition, when the control over such data is poorly regulated, it can get to the black market, where it carries high value among criminals and criminal organizations. In fact, the growth of the digital black market and the value of information on it is a whole different story. You can see some of the pay me to do your homework reviews on and order a paper on the topic from the professionals. However, one thing is clear here. There are cases in the world when it’s unknown who monitors the data and what value it represents to certain people. 


A93820014BS Abu Dhabi accidents ACLU ACS Advertising Aha Mobile AI Airsage ALPR ALPR Cameras Android Apple Arizona Atlanta ATS Attorney Australia Auto Insurance average speed cameras Baltimore Belgium Beltronics Bikes Bribe Brooklyn Buy Buying California Camera Vans Canada carplay Carpool Cars CDOT cell phone Chicago City Council Class Action Cobra Colorado Connected Signals Connecticut construction contracts Corruption courtesty notice courtesy notice Crashes crime Crosswalk crowdsourcing Culver City Dangerous Intersections Dash Cam Data Database Des Moines Distracted Drivers DIY DOT download Drivers License Driving Instructor Drowsy Drunk Drivers Dubai DUI E-ZPass England Escort Europe Facial Recognition failure to stop Fake Cameras FasTrak Fighting Tickets Finance Fines Fleets Florida FOIA Ford France freedom of information act request Garmin Gatso Georgia Germany Ghost Glendale Google Google Maps Government GPS Angel GPS Navigation Guest Writer Hawaii Here Highway Robbery Highways HOV Cameras How To humor Illinois Injury Inrix Insignia Instagram Insurance Insurenet iOS IOT Iowa iphone iRadar Ireland Italy Iteris Joe Biden Laser Craft Law Suit Laws lawyer Left Turns legal Legislation License Plate Local London Long Beach Los Angeles Loud Exhaust Louisiana LPR Cameras Lyft Machine Learning Magellan Maine Maintenance Manhattan maps Marketing Maryland Massachusetts Microsoft Minnesota Missouri Mitac Mobile Ads Mobile Apps mobile speed zone Motorcycle MTA Navigation Navigon Navteq Nestor Netherlands New Jersey New Mexico New Orleans New York New Zealand News NHTSA Nokia NTSB Oahu Oakland Ohio Oregon Parking Parking Tickets Parks Peasy Pennsylvania Phantom Alert Philadelphia Phoenix Photo Notice photographs POI Points Poland police Politics Poll Portugal Privacy Progressive Web App Protest Radar Railroad Reckless Driving red light cameras RedFlex RedSpeed redzone refunds Removing rental car tickets Repairs research revenue Rhode Island Ridesharing Right Turns rolling right turns Russia Sacramento Safe Speed Safety Safety Cameras San Diego San Francisco San Jose Scam Schools Seat Belt Seattle secutity settlement Shutting Down signs Singapore Snitch Tickets solar Sound Cameras Spain speed cameras Speed Vans State Ban stop sign cameras Street View Students subpoena Subscription Supreme Court Surveillance Switzerland Taxi Technology TeleAtlas Telematics Tennessee Tesla Texas Texting Tickets Tips Toll Road TomTom Tracking Traffic traffic attorney Traffic Camera Traffic Lights Traffic Safety Traffic School traffic tickets Trapster Trial by Written Declaration Trinity Trucking trucks UAE Uber UK Unpaid Ticket Vehicle Occupancy Verra Mobility video Vigilant Violation Fines Violation Info Violation Speed Virginia Vision Zero Voters warning devices warning notice Washington Washington DC Waze Wikango Xerox Yellow Lights YouTube