Traffic Camera or Red Light Camera?

A Traffic Monitoring Camera Is Not The Same As A Red Light Camera

Many of our readers often get confused about the difference between a red light camera and a traffic camera.  Traffic monitoring cameras typically sit on top of traffic lights and monitor traffic flowing through an intersection or on the highway.  They do not take pictures of vehicles that run red lights or issue citations.  Red light cameras are much bulkier and are positioned on the side of the road.  Cameras are typically 10 to 15 feet off the ground and are pointing in the direction of oncoming traffic or sometimes in the rear.  Here is an example showing a red light camera vs a traffic camera.


Red-light cameras require a big tall box near the intersection, this is where there will be a flash and where pictures are actually recorded. Traffic surveillance is just small cameras, usually on top of the intersection, and it's just a regular, small surveillance camera.  

If you do a Google Images search it is wrong.  Here are photos of what red light cameras look like.



Baltimore Speed Cameras Generate $20M

Baltimore Speed Camera

In the last fiscal year the City of Baltimore, Maryland took in almost $20 million in fines that are mailed in following a citation that comes after a speed camera takes a picture of vehicles exceeding the posted limit by more than 12 miles an hour. The fine will cost your $40 per ticket and are mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.  The city was expecting to generate $16M so it far exceeded their expectations.  

You can view the Baltimore Speed Camera PDF file or you can search our Baltimore speed camera locations map. There are 87 portable locations, 75 fixed speed camera locations and 81 red light camera locations.  PhotoEnforced.com only lists the fix camera locations in the database and map.  

Tracking Cyclist Who Run Red Lights


Apparently, cyclists in Australia are deliberately flouting road rules by running red lights and endangering other road users. Most escape prosecution because they cannot be identified.  There is no number plate or similar form of identification on a bicycle and facial recognition is not possible because the traffic safety camera takes photographs from the rear.

Red light camera photographic evidence provided by Police shows cyclists are snapped running through red lights but avoid any penalty - otherwise incurred by motorists - unless police are on the scene.  Cyclists in Australia have a greater chance of being picked up for not wearing a helmet, with 14,798 fines handed out in the past five years. In the same period, 2207 were booked for not having the correct lighting and equipment. Police issued 690 fines to cyclists ignoring traffic signals from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2011, but many more escaped the law.  Read full story.   

DC Installing Stop Sign Cameras

stop sign camera photo enforced
Come to A Complete Stop at Intersections Like This

Washington D.C.'s Police Chief Cathy Lanier said that MPD would look to install between eight and 10 Stop sign cameras before the end of the year.  D.C. has become notorious as an area that generates huge profits off of photo enforcement tickets. Red light cameras and speeding cameras are installed in numerous parts of the city. There is a new kind of automated photo enforcement that is set to hit the city, and it will be targeting one of the most common violations while behind the wheel: rolling through a stop sign.

PhotoEnforced.com currently has 28 stop sign cameras listed on its website.  The web site allows anyone to search the database and add new locations.   

Red Bank City Council May Dump Cameras


Drivers in Red Bank may be about to breathe a sigh of relief; the town is just one meeting away from getting rid of its much unloved red light cameras. The controversial cameras, which have been labeled as cash-grabbing machines by the general public since their introduction, have fast been losing support from Red Bank’s officials as they apparently put visitors off coming to the city.

Red Bank’s Mayor Milliard said that motorists were choosing to stay away from the city, which has become well-known for its red-light camera installations, for fear of being unfairly ticketed at red lights. Many residents and visitors alike had previously complained to the city council that they were being fined by the over-zealous machines when making honest mistakes or misjudgments driving through traffic signal systems at interchanges. As a result, visitors have said they’d sooner bypass the city of Red Bank, rather than visit it as they did not want to be fined.

“Hurting the city”

Mayor Monty Milliard, who also voted against a 12-year contract extension with American Traffic Solutions in 2010, said that he wanted people to visit Red Bank, not avoid it. "I have had over 100 conversations with residents and business owners, all who say that the cameras are hurting the city.”

Therefore, the Mayor has called for an official vote to cancel Red Bank’s red-light camera contract at the next meeting of the city’s commissioners on September 4. The Mayor has, however, warned the public that, if the vote to remove the cameras is passed, the earliest they can be taken down is the first day of next year. The city authorities would also need to give contractors 90 days notice.

Safety features or cash-grabbers?

It has been seven years since the unpopular red-light cameras were installed into three intersections on Dayton Boulevard (Morrison Springs Road, Signal Mountain Road and Ashland Terrace), the main road serving the city of Red Bank. The cameras, which are owned and run by American Traffic Solutions, were initially intended to act as a safety feature. It was claimed that many drivers were jumping red lights and, as a result, were causing road traffic accidents. The cameras capture photographic evidence of any driver passing through a red light and then issue a fine. However, many drivers have since complained that the cameras are overzealous, often issuing fines unfairly. Cash-strapped motorists have accused the city’s authorities of using them as cash cows, unjustly penalizing them in order to increase revenue.

Milliard, who has been vehemently opposed to the cameras since their 2005 installation, has also confirmed that revenue from fines being issued due to driving infractions has fallen significantly. This is due to a new law passed in 2011 by the Tennessee General Assembly that won’t allow issuing of a ticket for failing to come to a complete stop at a traffic signal before initiating a right turn. Also, a large proportion of the revenue generated from fines is handed over to American Traffic Solutions each month; in 2008-9, Red Bank made just over $579,000 from tickets but handed over around half of that to the Arizona-based company.

Outcome unclear

Whether or not the vote to remove the cameras will be successful or not is unclear. Two commissioners that have long been in favor of the cameras, Floy Pierce and Ruth Jeno, will both be voting. The pair both voted to extend the red light camera contract back in 2010, but could the passing of the new legislation have swayed their opinion?

Removal will be welcome

One thing is for sure, the general public will be echoing Mayor Milliard’s sentiment on the cameras. At a time when the cost of driving is at an all-time high, many people argue that red light cameras raise that cost even higher. Particularly vulnerable are young drivers, who already have higher insurance premiums to cover. Not only are they faced with extortionate fines to pay, but this could also then impact on their driving records, making young drivers insurance harder to obtain. It is clear that a vote next week to remove the city’s cameras will be a welcome piece of news for Red Bank’s drivers.

Jacksonville Red Light Cameras

map of red light cameras will be coming to Jacksonville, Florida in January of 2013
Coming in 2013

Red light cameras will be coming to Jacksonville, Florida in January of 2013.  Redflex is the red light camera operator who will send the car’s registered owner a citation for $158. If that’s not paid within 30 days, the Sheriff’s Office will issue a follow-up ticket costing $262.

The city’s 2013 budget projects $1.5 million in revenue from the cameras. Redflex Traffic Systems, a company hired by the Sheriff’s Office to install cameras, has been given a list of 25 dangerous approaches to 17 intersections and told to start with the five worst.

Redflex ill forward footage from each approach to the Sheriff’s Office, where an officer will review images from six seconds before and after each violation occurs.

Under Florida state law, violators can be fined $158, with the town collecting $75 and $70 going to the state.

Popular Articles (All Time)