Shares in Redflex Holdings (ASX:RDF) have jumped 6.4% since the company revealed it may receive a takeover bid higher than the $2.50 per share informally offered by a Macquarie Group (ASX:MQG) unit. It was reported back in June that it was looking to take over Redflex for $275M and that is when the ASX: RDF shares were trading around $2 per share. If our calculations are correct the takeover bid should be just under $340M now.
From an opening price of $2.36, RDF shares closed the day's trading 8.5% higher at $2.55. Redflex's range of point-to-point cameras on the Hume Highway was taken offline this week after it was revealed they had incorrectly reported traffic infringements on nine occasions. The problem occurred as a result of cameras briefly falling out of synch with each other, and while Redflex has devised a solution the devices will need to be thoroughly tested until police are willing to turn them back on.
The red light photo enforcement technology company said in a statement that it had received indicative offers from “a number of credible parties” for over $2.50 per share. Redflex has entered discussions with a short list of these parties, including due diligence proceedings. But the offers made are so far non-binding, and there can be no assurance that any of the talks will result in a formal proposal, the statement read. Even the Macquarie Group unit's offer, made in August, was non-binding. Redflex had advised shareholders to take no action on the proposal.
Macquarie Group is a global provider of banking, financial, advisory, investment and funds management services. Macquarie’s main business focus is making returns by providing a diversified range of services to clients. Macquarie acts on behalf of institutional, corporate and retail clients and counterparties around the world. Founded in 1969, Macquarie employs more than 14,600 people in approximately 70 office locations in 28 countries
Related Stories:
Redflex Takeover Bid for $275M
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(17)
- ► April 2012 (7)
- ► February 2012 (5)
-
►
2011
(56)
-
►
June 2011
(9)
- Do All Red Light Camera Intersections Have Warning...
- Longer Yellow Lights vs Red Light Cameras
- Watch Out for this Red Light Camera Ticket Collect...
- 10 Reasons to Keep Red Light Cameras
- Do You Still Have to Pay Your LA Red Light Camera ...
- New Traffic School Laws with Multiple Tickets
- Should LA Shut Down the Red Light Cameras?
- Criminal Justice Debate: Are Red Light Cameras Unc...
- Have a Ticket With an Unclear Photo of You?
-
►
April 2011
(8)
- Are Red Light Camera Fines Too High?
- LA Losing Money on Red Light Cameras
- Connecticut Considers Red Light Cameras
- Automated Enforcement Citations: Statement of Iden...
- Navigon Mobile Navigator Speed Camera Database Rev...
- RoadTraps Database is Missing Thousands of Red Lig...
- Escort Speed Trap Website?
- Seat Belt Tickets from Camera
-
►
March 2011
(8)
- Improper Right or Left Turn Tickets
- Orange France Gets Wikango Real Time Speed Camera ...
- RIM Removes Drunk Driving Checkpoint Apps
- Railroad Crossing Tickets
- Can Motorcycles Avoid Red Light Camera Tickets?
- Talking on Cell Phone Ticket in California
- Traffic Ticket Requested Information of Me
- Witness Statement for Red Light Camera Ticket
- ► February 2011 (15)
- ► January 2011 (10)
-
►
June 2011
(9)
-
▼
2010
(97)
- ► December 2010 (11)
- ► November 2010 (13)
-
▼
October 2010
(12)
- Photo Enforcement on a Federal Highways
- Google Maps Needs Safety Cameras
- Does License Plate Blocker Spray Work?
- Albuquerque Red Light Cameras Cost Taxpayers $30,0...
- Rochester New York Red Light Cameras
- Macquarie Group Buying Redflex for $350M?
- Quantcast Audience Profile & Monthly Visitors
- Still No TomTom Red Light Camera POI Database
- Trinity Red Light Camera Database Questions
- Navigation + Cell Phone Terminal Mode
- NAVTEQ Does Not Believe in Crowdsourcing
- NAVTEQ a Media Company?
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (6)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (27)
-
►
2009
(20)
- ► December 2009 (1)
- ► November 2009 (2)
- ► October 2009 (5)
- ► September 2009 (1)
- ► August 2009 (1)
- ► April 2009 (2)
- ► March 2009 (4)
- ► February 2009 (2)
-
►
2008
(29)
- ► December 2008 (2)
- ► November 2008 (7)
- ► October 2008 (6)
- ► September 2008 (1)
- ► April 2008 (1)
- ► February 2008 (4)
- ► January 2008 (1)
-
►
2007
(18)
- ► December 2007 (2)
- ► April 2007 (1)
- ► March 2007 (1)
- ► February 2007 (11)
- ► January 2007 (2)
-
►
2006
(41)
- ► December 2006 (3)
- ► November 2006 (3)
- ► October 2006 (3)
- ► August 2006 (2)
- ► April 2006 (6)
- ► March 2006 (6)

